Teachers’ views on the ethical issues in educational assessment practices: a comparative mixed-methods study

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xumei Fan, Suzy Hardie, Jin Liu, Ning Jiang
{"title":"Teachers’ views on the ethical issues in educational assessment practices: a comparative mixed-methods study","authors":"Xumei Fan,&nbsp;Suzy Hardie,&nbsp;Jin Liu,&nbsp;Ning Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s12564-025-10039-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Educational assessment is a part of accountability in K-12 education, and teachers often face ethical dilemmas in assessment practices. We conducted a comparative mixed-methods study of teachers’ perspectives on educational assessment practices in the United States and China. A survey with 255 teachers based on 14 assessment scenarios within seven categories revealed that American teachers and Chinese teachers had consistent views on five scenarios, and they referenced common assessment guidelines in their justifications for whether they view certain practices as ethical or not. They disagreed on nine scenarios, prioritizing different guidelines to support their views about whether certain practices were ethical or not. Within each culture, teachers’ views of certain scenarios differed based on gender, academic degree, years of experience, and grade levels taught in certain scenarios. The differences in teachers’ views and reasoning were shaped by their cultural backgrounds, educational and professional experiences, and educational systems and policies. The findings can help raise educators’ awareness of assessment practices shaped by cultural contexts, guide teaching, learning, and assessment, and inform educational policymaking and program development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"26 2","pages":"539 - 552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-025-10039-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational assessment is a part of accountability in K-12 education, and teachers often face ethical dilemmas in assessment practices. We conducted a comparative mixed-methods study of teachers’ perspectives on educational assessment practices in the United States and China. A survey with 255 teachers based on 14 assessment scenarios within seven categories revealed that American teachers and Chinese teachers had consistent views on five scenarios, and they referenced common assessment guidelines in their justifications for whether they view certain practices as ethical or not. They disagreed on nine scenarios, prioritizing different guidelines to support their views about whether certain practices were ethical or not. Within each culture, teachers’ views of certain scenarios differed based on gender, academic degree, years of experience, and grade levels taught in certain scenarios. The differences in teachers’ views and reasoning were shaped by their cultural backgrounds, educational and professional experiences, and educational systems and policies. The findings can help raise educators’ awareness of assessment practices shaped by cultural contexts, guide teaching, learning, and assessment, and inform educational policymaking and program development.

教师对教育评价实践中伦理问题的看法:一项比较混合方法研究
教育评估是K-12教育问责制的一部分,教师在评估实践中经常面临道德困境。我们对美国和中国教师对教育评估实践的观点进行了一项比较混合方法研究。一项针对255名教师的调查显示,美国教师和中国教师在7类14种评估情景中对5种情景的看法是一致的,他们在证明自己是否认为某些做法合乎道德时参考了共同的评估准则。他们在九种情况下存在分歧,优先考虑不同的指导方针,以支持他们对某些做法是否合乎道德的看法。在每一种文化中,教师对特定情景的看法因性别、学历、经验年数和在特定情景中授课的年级而异。教师的观点和推理差异是由他们的文化背景、教育和专业经历以及教育制度和政策所决定的。研究结果有助于提高教育工作者对受文化背景影响的评估实践的认识,指导教学、学习和评估,并为教育政策制定和项目开发提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信