{"title":"Teachers’ views on the ethical issues in educational assessment practices: a comparative mixed-methods study","authors":"Xumei Fan, Suzy Hardie, Jin Liu, Ning Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s12564-025-10039-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Educational assessment is a part of accountability in K-12 education, and teachers often face ethical dilemmas in assessment practices. We conducted a comparative mixed-methods study of teachers’ perspectives on educational assessment practices in the United States and China. A survey with 255 teachers based on 14 assessment scenarios within seven categories revealed that American teachers and Chinese teachers had consistent views on five scenarios, and they referenced common assessment guidelines in their justifications for whether they view certain practices as ethical or not. They disagreed on nine scenarios, prioritizing different guidelines to support their views about whether certain practices were ethical or not. Within each culture, teachers’ views of certain scenarios differed based on gender, academic degree, years of experience, and grade levels taught in certain scenarios. The differences in teachers’ views and reasoning were shaped by their cultural backgrounds, educational and professional experiences, and educational systems and policies. The findings can help raise educators’ awareness of assessment practices shaped by cultural contexts, guide teaching, learning, and assessment, and inform educational policymaking and program development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"26 2","pages":"539 - 552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-025-10039-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Educational assessment is a part of accountability in K-12 education, and teachers often face ethical dilemmas in assessment practices. We conducted a comparative mixed-methods study of teachers’ perspectives on educational assessment practices in the United States and China. A survey with 255 teachers based on 14 assessment scenarios within seven categories revealed that American teachers and Chinese teachers had consistent views on five scenarios, and they referenced common assessment guidelines in their justifications for whether they view certain practices as ethical or not. They disagreed on nine scenarios, prioritizing different guidelines to support their views about whether certain practices were ethical or not. Within each culture, teachers’ views of certain scenarios differed based on gender, academic degree, years of experience, and grade levels taught in certain scenarios. The differences in teachers’ views and reasoning were shaped by their cultural backgrounds, educational and professional experiences, and educational systems and policies. The findings can help raise educators’ awareness of assessment practices shaped by cultural contexts, guide teaching, learning, and assessment, and inform educational policymaking and program development.
期刊介绍:
The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context.
APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003.
APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).