Beyond conventional methods: direct calculation of P32 in DFN models for enhanced rock mass analysis

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mehrdad Zanganeh, Mosleh Eftekhari, Morteza Ahmadi
{"title":"Beyond conventional methods: direct calculation of P32 in DFN models for enhanced rock mass analysis","authors":"Mehrdad Zanganeh,&nbsp;Mosleh Eftekhari,&nbsp;Morteza Ahmadi","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04432-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) model is utilized to characterize the heterogeneous nature of rock masses. The most reliable parameter for fracture intensity within DFN modeling is the volumetric fracture intensity, denoted as P32. Direct field measurement of P32 is not feasible; hence, it is estimated using other 1D and 2D fracture intensity parameters. The influence of P32 uncertainties on rock mass characterization and the representative elementary volume (REV) demands analysis. This paper examines the effects of P32 estimation uncertainties, derived from 2D fracture intensity—specifically aerial density, P20— on the geometrical-based REV size. Discrete Fracture Network simulations were employed to infer P32 values from P20 inputs. A novel method for estimating P32 from P20 is proposed and compared with the conventional approaches using the underground powerhouse cavern of the Azad dam as a case study. In the proposed method, P32 is directly calculated within the DFN, which is generated based on size, orientation distribution, and P20 values. Subsequent numerical analyses validate the DFN models via rock quality designation (RQD) and assess the impact of P32 uncertainties on REV size, considering both RQD and P32. Results indicate that the RQD values computed within the DFN model, based on the proposed method, suggest greater accuracy compared to conventional methods. Although the REV size estimates showed no significant difference between the two approaches, the proposed method was found to be more time-efficient, offering advantages in both computational performance and modeling accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04432-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) model is utilized to characterize the heterogeneous nature of rock masses. The most reliable parameter for fracture intensity within DFN modeling is the volumetric fracture intensity, denoted as P32. Direct field measurement of P32 is not feasible; hence, it is estimated using other 1D and 2D fracture intensity parameters. The influence of P32 uncertainties on rock mass characterization and the representative elementary volume (REV) demands analysis. This paper examines the effects of P32 estimation uncertainties, derived from 2D fracture intensity—specifically aerial density, P20— on the geometrical-based REV size. Discrete Fracture Network simulations were employed to infer P32 values from P20 inputs. A novel method for estimating P32 from P20 is proposed and compared with the conventional approaches using the underground powerhouse cavern of the Azad dam as a case study. In the proposed method, P32 is directly calculated within the DFN, which is generated based on size, orientation distribution, and P20 values. Subsequent numerical analyses validate the DFN models via rock quality designation (RQD) and assess the impact of P32 uncertainties on REV size, considering both RQD and P32. Results indicate that the RQD values computed within the DFN model, based on the proposed method, suggest greater accuracy compared to conventional methods. Although the REV size estimates showed no significant difference between the two approaches, the proposed method was found to be more time-efficient, offering advantages in both computational performance and modeling accuracy.

Abstract Image

超越常规方法:直接计算DFN模型中的P32,以增强岩体分析
采用离散裂隙网络(DFN)模型来表征岩体的非均质性。DFN模型中最可靠的断裂强度参数是体积断裂强度,记为P32。P32的直接现场测量是不可行的;因此,使用其他1D和2D断裂强度参数进行估计。P32不确定性对岩体表征和代表性基本体积(REV)需求分析的影响。本文研究了P32估计不确定性对基于几何的REV大小的影响,P32估计不确定性来自2D裂缝强度,特别是航空密度P20。采用离散裂缝网络模拟从P20输入推断P32值。提出了一种由P20估算P32的新方法,并以Azad大坝地下厂房洞室为例与传统方法进行了比较。在该方法中,直接在DFN内计算P32, DFN是根据尺寸、方向分布和P20值生成的。随后的数值分析通过岩石质量指定(RQD)验证了DFN模型,并评估了考虑RQD和P32的P32不确定性对REV大小的影响。结果表明,基于DFN模型计算的RQD值与传统方法相比具有更高的准确性。虽然两种方法之间的REV大小估计没有显着差异,但发现所提出的方法更具时间效率,在计算性能和建模精度方面都具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信