Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Microplastic Removal

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
S. M. Zakir Hossain
{"title":"Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Microplastic Removal","authors":"S. M. Zakir Hossain","doi":"10.1007/s13369-025-10116-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microplastics (MPs), the newest type of pollution, are present almost everywhere in the world. This study investigated the possibility of using hybrid Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) and machine learning (ML) techniques (e.g., artificial neural network (ANN), boosted regression tree (BRT), and support vector regression (SVR)) to forecast the removal of MPs during the coagulation process for the first time. The independent variables, including polypropylene microplastic (PPMPs) size, pH, polyacrylamide (PAM), and polyaluminium chloride (PAC), were considered, while the MPs removal rate was the response variable. The results demonstrate the hybrid BOA-BRT model's superiority, with a high coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) and low mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error values, indicating its effectiveness in predicting MPs removal efficiency. The hybrid BOA-ANN model shows higher MAE, RMSE, and MAPE values than BOA-BRT. The statistical multiple linear regression (MLR) and hybrid BOA-SVR models also yielded comparable results, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of approximately 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. The performance of the best predictive BOA-BRT model was compared with the existing response surface methodology (RSM) model (Adib et al. in J Environ Health Sci Eng 20:565–577, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-022-00803-4). Regarding MAE, RMSE, and MAPE values, BOA-BRT outperformed the RSM with a performance enhancement of about 68%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. The model's generalization ability was tested with extra simulated data. Sensitivity analysis showed the relative importance of the input variables on MP removal rate in decreasing order as PPMPs size &gt; pH &gt; PAM dose &gt; PAC dose. This study creates novel avenues for investigating different microplastic removal technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54354,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"50 13","pages":"10219 - 10232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13369-025-10116-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs), the newest type of pollution, are present almost everywhere in the world. This study investigated the possibility of using hybrid Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) and machine learning (ML) techniques (e.g., artificial neural network (ANN), boosted regression tree (BRT), and support vector regression (SVR)) to forecast the removal of MPs during the coagulation process for the first time. The independent variables, including polypropylene microplastic (PPMPs) size, pH, polyacrylamide (PAM), and polyaluminium chloride (PAC), were considered, while the MPs removal rate was the response variable. The results demonstrate the hybrid BOA-BRT model's superiority, with a high coefficient of determination (R2) and low mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error values, indicating its effectiveness in predicting MPs removal efficiency. The hybrid BOA-ANN model shows higher MAE, RMSE, and MAPE values than BOA-BRT. The statistical multiple linear regression (MLR) and hybrid BOA-SVR models also yielded comparable results, with R2 values of approximately 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. The performance of the best predictive BOA-BRT model was compared with the existing response surface methodology (RSM) model (Adib et al. in J Environ Health Sci Eng 20:565–577, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-022-00803-4). Regarding MAE, RMSE, and MAPE values, BOA-BRT outperformed the RSM with a performance enhancement of about 68%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. The model's generalization ability was tested with extra simulated data. Sensitivity analysis showed the relative importance of the input variables on MP removal rate in decreasing order as PPMPs size > pH > PAM dose > PAC dose. This study creates novel avenues for investigating different microplastic removal technologies.

Abstract Image

预测微塑料去除的机器学习方法
微塑料(MPs)是一种最新的污染,几乎在世界各地都存在。本研究首次探讨了使用混合贝叶斯优化算法(BOA)和机器学习(ML)技术(如人工神经网络(ANN)、增强回归树(BRT)和支持向量回归(SVR))预测凝血过程中MPs去除的可能性。以聚丙烯微塑料(PPMPs)粒径、pH、聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)和聚合氯化铝(PAC)为自变量,以MPs去除率为响应变量。结果表明,混合BOA-BRT模型具有较高的决定系数(R2)和较低的平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对百分比误差值,表明其在预测MPs去除效率方面的有效性。混合BOA-ANN模型的MAE、RMSE和MAPE值均高于BOA-BRT模型。统计多元线性回归(MLR)和混合BOA-SVR模型的结果也相当,R2值分别约为0.82和0.83。将最佳预测BOA-BRT模型的性能与现有的响应面法(RSM)模型进行了比较(Adib等,journal of environmental Health science engineering, 20:565 - 57,2022)。https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201 - 022 - 00803 - 4)。在MAE、RMSE和MAPE值方面,BOA-BRT的性能分别提高了68%、71%和63%,优于RSM。用额外的仿真数据验证了模型的泛化能力。敏感性分析显示,各输入变量对MP去除率的相对重要性依次为PPMPs粒径>; pH >; PAM剂量>; PAC剂量。这项研究为研究不同的微塑料去除技术创造了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
993
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信