Structural behavior of reinforced low-carbon concrete beams adapted for precast

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mathieu Pellerano, Gabriel Samson, Zakaria Ilyes Djamaï, Anthony Calviac, Cédric Patapy, Martin Cyr
{"title":"Structural behavior of reinforced low-carbon concrete beams adapted for precast","authors":"Mathieu Pellerano,&nbsp;Gabriel Samson,&nbsp;Zakaria Ilyes Djamaï,&nbsp;Anthony Calviac,&nbsp;Cédric Patapy,&nbsp;Martin Cyr","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02703-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the structural behavior of two low-carbon self-compacting concretes in comparison to an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) concrete, used as a reference: a binary binder S70 (OPC substituted by 70% of ground granulated blast furnace slag, GGBS,−58% of carbon emission (em-CO<sub>2</sub>) versus OPC) and a supersulfated cement SSC (− 78% of em-CO<sub>2</sub> versus OPC).</p><p>For each binder, a mechanical characterization through compressive strength, tensile strength and Young’s modulus tests after 28 days and 90 days, was carried out. Steel–concrete bonding at 28 days was also tested through pull-out tests. Additionally, two beams per binder (3-meter long, section 280 × 150 mm²) were cast, varying the longitudinal reinforcement section: a low steel reinforcement ratio (1.6 cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>Conf1</i>) leading to steels rupture, and a high steel reinforcement ratio (7.1 cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>Conf2</i>) for higher beam resistance. The design of the beams was made according to Eurocode 2. Beams were tested using 4-point bending test with the recording of strains at different locations of the beam using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).</p><p>For both configurations, S70 and SSC binders resulted in an equivalent load–deflection behavior compared to OPC beam, despite lower mechanical properties for SSC concrete, while reducing the associated carbon emissions. The DIC system helped to explain the observed fracture modes (reinforcements or “shear force” ruptures) and revealed slight differences in behavior between the beams, such as variations in the position of the neutral axis, as well as number of cracks and opening. These results suggest that structures with low-carbon binders can be dimensioned according to Eurocode 2, similar to OPC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02703-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02703-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the structural behavior of two low-carbon self-compacting concretes in comparison to an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) concrete, used as a reference: a binary binder S70 (OPC substituted by 70% of ground granulated blast furnace slag, GGBS,−58% of carbon emission (em-CO2) versus OPC) and a supersulfated cement SSC (− 78% of em-CO2 versus OPC).

For each binder, a mechanical characterization through compressive strength, tensile strength and Young’s modulus tests after 28 days and 90 days, was carried out. Steel–concrete bonding at 28 days was also tested through pull-out tests. Additionally, two beams per binder (3-meter long, section 280 × 150 mm²) were cast, varying the longitudinal reinforcement section: a low steel reinforcement ratio (1.6 cm2, Conf1) leading to steels rupture, and a high steel reinforcement ratio (7.1 cm2, Conf2) for higher beam resistance. The design of the beams was made according to Eurocode 2. Beams were tested using 4-point bending test with the recording of strains at different locations of the beam using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).

For both configurations, S70 and SSC binders resulted in an equivalent load–deflection behavior compared to OPC beam, despite lower mechanical properties for SSC concrete, while reducing the associated carbon emissions. The DIC system helped to explain the observed fracture modes (reinforcements or “shear force” ruptures) and revealed slight differences in behavior between the beams, such as variations in the position of the neutral axis, as well as number of cracks and opening. These results suggest that structures with low-carbon binders can be dimensioned according to Eurocode 2, similar to OPC.

适用于预制的钢筋低碳混凝土梁的结构性能
本研究评估了两种低碳自密实混凝土的结构性能,并将其与普通波特兰水泥(OPC)混凝土进行了比较,作为参考:一种是二元粘结剂S70 (OPC由70%的磨碎的粒状高炉矿渣GGBS取代,碳排放量(em-CO2)比OPC减少- 58%),另一种是超硫酸盐水泥SSC (em-CO2比OPC减少- 78%)。对于每种粘结剂,通过28天和90天后的抗压强度、抗拉强度和杨氏模量测试进行力学表征。通过拉拔试验对28 d时钢-混凝土粘结进行了试验。此外,每个粘合剂铸造两根梁(3米长,截面280 × 150mm²),改变纵向钢筋截面:低钢筋比(1.6 cm2, Conf1)导致钢材断裂,高钢筋比(7.1 cm2, Conf2)为更高的梁阻力。梁的设计是根据欧洲规范2。采用四点弯曲试验对梁进行测试,采用数字图像相关(DIC)技术记录梁不同位置的应变。对于这两种结构,尽管SSC混凝土的力学性能较低,但与OPC梁相比,S70和SSC粘结剂的载荷-挠度性能相当,同时减少了相关的碳排放。DIC系统有助于解释观察到的断裂模式(增强或“剪切力”破裂),并揭示了梁之间行为的细微差异,例如中性轴位置的变化,以及裂缝和开口的数量。这些结果表明,使用低碳粘结剂的结构可以按照欧洲规范2进行标注,类似于OPC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信