China’s Cross-City Consumption: Regional Preference and Mutual Benefits

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yonghong Xu, An Jiang, Bingjie Su, Shucheng Liu
{"title":"China’s Cross-City Consumption: Regional Preference and Mutual Benefits","authors":"Yonghong Xu,&nbsp;An Jiang,&nbsp;Bingjie Su,&nbsp;Shucheng Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12061-025-09702-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In China, intercity consumption exhibits segmented market characteristics shaped by geographical proximity and psychological affinity within the same province. This study constructs an intercity consumption network encompassing 295 prefecture-level cities using 14.4 billion intercity consumption records from UnionPay Business. First, we apply social network analysis to examine the network’s evolution over the sample period. Building on this framework, the Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (TERGM) is employed to investigate the determinants and formation mechanisms of intercity consumption relationships. The findings reveal that the overall connectivity of China’s consumption network has increased over the sample period, with a consumption structure centered on provincial capitals and municipalities directly under the central government. According to the TERGM results, cities with higher levels of economic development, larger populations, and greater income disparities are more likely to attract intercity consumption flows. Additionally, significant “provincial clustering effects,” “provincial capital effects,” and “geographical effects” are observed. Specifically, cities within the same province are more inclined to establish intercity consumption ties, while provincial capitals and centrally administered municipalities demonstrate a greater capacity to attract consumption. Moreover, geographical proximity, particularly between neighboring cities, fosters stronger intercity consumption linkages. Furthermore, evidence suggests the presence of reciprocity within the intercity consumption network, indicating a mutual reinforcement effect that enhances the overall connectivity of cities. The insights drawn from this study provide valuable reference for understanding and leveraging the advantages of China’s large-scale market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09702-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In China, intercity consumption exhibits segmented market characteristics shaped by geographical proximity and psychological affinity within the same province. This study constructs an intercity consumption network encompassing 295 prefecture-level cities using 14.4 billion intercity consumption records from UnionPay Business. First, we apply social network analysis to examine the network’s evolution over the sample period. Building on this framework, the Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (TERGM) is employed to investigate the determinants and formation mechanisms of intercity consumption relationships. The findings reveal that the overall connectivity of China’s consumption network has increased over the sample period, with a consumption structure centered on provincial capitals and municipalities directly under the central government. According to the TERGM results, cities with higher levels of economic development, larger populations, and greater income disparities are more likely to attract intercity consumption flows. Additionally, significant “provincial clustering effects,” “provincial capital effects,” and “geographical effects” are observed. Specifically, cities within the same province are more inclined to establish intercity consumption ties, while provincial capitals and centrally administered municipalities demonstrate a greater capacity to attract consumption. Moreover, geographical proximity, particularly between neighboring cities, fosters stronger intercity consumption linkages. Furthermore, evidence suggests the presence of reciprocity within the intercity consumption network, indicating a mutual reinforcement effect that enhances the overall connectivity of cities. The insights drawn from this study provide valuable reference for understanding and leveraging the advantages of China’s large-scale market.

中国跨城市消费:区域偏好与互惠互利
在中国,城市间消费呈现出地域邻近性和同一省份内的心理亲和力所塑造的细分市场特征。本研究利用银联业务144亿条城际消费记录,构建了包含295个地级市的城际消费网络。首先,我们应用社会网络分析来检验网络在样本期间的演变。在此框架下,采用时间指数随机图模型(TERGM)研究城市间消费关系的决定因素和形成机制。研究结果显示,在样本期内,中国消费网络的整体连通性有所增强,消费结构以省会城市和直辖市为中心。根据TERGM的结果,经济发展水平较高、人口较多、收入差距较大的城市更有可能吸引城际消费流。此外,还观察到显著的“省级集聚效应”、“省会效应”和“地理效应”。具体来说,同一省份内的城市更倾向于建立城际消费联系,而省会城市和中央直辖市则表现出更大的吸引消费的能力。此外,地理上的接近,特别是相邻城市之间的接近,促进了更强的城市间消费联系。此外,有证据表明,在城际消费网络中存在互惠,表明相互强化效应增强了城市的整体连通性。本文的研究结果为理解和利用中国大型市场的优势提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Description The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace. RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts  Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.   FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.   Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信