New forms of expertise and their implications for the system of professions in healthcare: the case of the patient safety specialist role in the English NHS
IF 5 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Graham P. Martin , Robert Pralat , Justin Waring , M. Farhad Peerally
{"title":"New forms of expertise and their implications for the system of professions in healthcare: the case of the patient safety specialist role in the English NHS","authors":"Graham P. Martin , Robert Pralat , Justin Waring , M. Farhad Peerally","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary societal shifts are disrupting established professional divisions of labour in healthcare. Some have argued that professionalism itself is being transformed, with professions characterised less by claims to exclusive jurisdiction and more by connectivity and complementarity. This article puts these arguments to the test in a domain traditionally characterised as one of professional conflict: patient safety. Informed by the sociology of expertise, we consider the case of a new role—the patient safety specialist—constructed by some as a profession in the making. Drawing on three qualitative datasets comprising interview and focus group contributions from 71 participants, we find that patient safety specialists struggled to establish the legitimacy of their expertise in organisational environments that were often hostile. By forging alignments with the interests of clinical professionals, however, some advanced their roles in ways that served mutual interests, in line with recent theses on the changing nature of professionalism and the need for expertise that connects increasingly interdependent jurisdictions. The extent to which this advancement offered a solid and durable foundation for a claim to professional status, however, seemed more questionable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 118562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contemporary societal shifts are disrupting established professional divisions of labour in healthcare. Some have argued that professionalism itself is being transformed, with professions characterised less by claims to exclusive jurisdiction and more by connectivity and complementarity. This article puts these arguments to the test in a domain traditionally characterised as one of professional conflict: patient safety. Informed by the sociology of expertise, we consider the case of a new role—the patient safety specialist—constructed by some as a profession in the making. Drawing on three qualitative datasets comprising interview and focus group contributions from 71 participants, we find that patient safety specialists struggled to establish the legitimacy of their expertise in organisational environments that were often hostile. By forging alignments with the interests of clinical professionals, however, some advanced their roles in ways that served mutual interests, in line with recent theses on the changing nature of professionalism and the need for expertise that connects increasingly interdependent jurisdictions. The extent to which this advancement offered a solid and durable foundation for a claim to professional status, however, seemed more questionable.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.