New forms of expertise and their implications for the system of professions in healthcare: the case of the patient safety specialist role in the English NHS

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Graham P. Martin , Robert Pralat , Justin Waring , M. Farhad Peerally
{"title":"New forms of expertise and their implications for the system of professions in healthcare: the case of the patient safety specialist role in the English NHS","authors":"Graham P. Martin ,&nbsp;Robert Pralat ,&nbsp;Justin Waring ,&nbsp;M. Farhad Peerally","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary societal shifts are disrupting established professional divisions of labour in healthcare. Some have argued that professionalism itself is being transformed, with professions characterised less by claims to exclusive jurisdiction and more by connectivity and complementarity. This article puts these arguments to the test in a domain traditionally characterised as one of professional conflict: patient safety. Informed by the sociology of expertise, we consider the case of a new role—the patient safety specialist—constructed by some as a profession in the making. Drawing on three qualitative datasets comprising interview and focus group contributions from 71 participants, we find that patient safety specialists struggled to establish the legitimacy of their expertise in organisational environments that were often hostile. By forging alignments with the interests of clinical professionals, however, some advanced their roles in ways that served mutual interests, in line with recent theses on the changing nature of professionalism and the need for expertise that connects increasingly interdependent jurisdictions. The extent to which this advancement offered a solid and durable foundation for a claim to professional status, however, seemed more questionable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 118562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary societal shifts are disrupting established professional divisions of labour in healthcare. Some have argued that professionalism itself is being transformed, with professions characterised less by claims to exclusive jurisdiction and more by connectivity and complementarity. This article puts these arguments to the test in a domain traditionally characterised as one of professional conflict: patient safety. Informed by the sociology of expertise, we consider the case of a new role—the patient safety specialist—constructed by some as a profession in the making. Drawing on three qualitative datasets comprising interview and focus group contributions from 71 participants, we find that patient safety specialists struggled to establish the legitimacy of their expertise in organisational environments that were often hostile. By forging alignments with the interests of clinical professionals, however, some advanced their roles in ways that served mutual interests, in line with recent theses on the changing nature of professionalism and the need for expertise that connects increasingly interdependent jurisdictions. The extent to which this advancement offered a solid and durable foundation for a claim to professional status, however, seemed more questionable.
新形式的专业知识及其对医疗保健专业系统的影响:患者安全专家在英国国家医疗服务体系中的作用
当代社会的转变正在扰乱医疗保健领域既定的专业分工。一些人认为,专业主义本身正在发生转变,职业的特点不再是声称拥有专属管辖权,而是更多地体现在连通性和互补性上。本文在一个传统上被认为是职业冲突之一的领域对这些论点进行了检验:患者安全。在专业知识社会学的指导下,我们考虑了一个新角色的案例——病人安全专家——由一些人构建为一个正在形成的职业。根据71名参与者的访谈和焦点小组贡献的三个定性数据集,我们发现患者安全专家在经常充满敌意的组织环境中努力建立其专业知识的合法性。然而,通过与临床专业人员的利益结盟,一些人以服务于共同利益的方式推进了他们的角色,这与最近关于专业性质的变化以及连接日益相互依存的司法管辖区的专业知识需求的论文是一致的。然而,这种进步在多大程度上为要求获得专业地位提供了坚实而持久的基础,似乎更值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信