Beyond the post: The impact of politized anti-vaccine misinformation comments and challenges of correction on social media

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Xiaohui Cao , Porismita Borah , Danielle Ka Lai Lee , Anastasia Vishnevskaya , Yan Su , Kyle Lorenzano
{"title":"Beyond the post: The impact of politized anti-vaccine misinformation comments and challenges of correction on social media","authors":"Xiaohui Cao ,&nbsp;Porismita Borah ,&nbsp;Danielle Ka Lai Lee ,&nbsp;Anastasia Vishnevskaya ,&nbsp;Yan Su ,&nbsp;Kyle Lorenzano","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the proven effectiveness of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer, vaccination rates in the United States remain low, in part because parents' decisions are heavily shaped by misinformation encountered on social media. Using an online experimental design (<em>N</em> = 1039), this study investigated the effects of politized anti-vaccine misinformation comments under CDC posts on parents' vaccination hesitancy as well as the emotional mechanism of this impact. Individual's need for cognition (NFC) was also examined as a moderator. Furthermore, we explored whether CDC corrections help to mitigate these negative effects. Results showed a moderated mediation relationship. Participants exposed to politized anti-vaccine misinformation comments reported higher HPV vaccine hesitancy, with negative emotions toward the original post mediating this association. However, this pattern was observed only among participants with low to medium levels of NFC. For individuals with high NFC, the relationship between negative emotions and vaccine hesitancy, as well as the mediation effect of negative emotions, were not significant. Corrections from the CDC did not help decrease the negative emotions and HPV vaccine hesitancy. This study extends prior research by investigating the effectiveness of second-layer correction comments, an increasingly common but underexamined form of misinformation correction strategy in the current interactive social media environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 127760"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25010576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the proven effectiveness of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer, vaccination rates in the United States remain low, in part because parents' decisions are heavily shaped by misinformation encountered on social media. Using an online experimental design (N = 1039), this study investigated the effects of politized anti-vaccine misinformation comments under CDC posts on parents' vaccination hesitancy as well as the emotional mechanism of this impact. Individual's need for cognition (NFC) was also examined as a moderator. Furthermore, we explored whether CDC corrections help to mitigate these negative effects. Results showed a moderated mediation relationship. Participants exposed to politized anti-vaccine misinformation comments reported higher HPV vaccine hesitancy, with negative emotions toward the original post mediating this association. However, this pattern was observed only among participants with low to medium levels of NFC. For individuals with high NFC, the relationship between negative emotions and vaccine hesitancy, as well as the mediation effect of negative emotions, were not significant. Corrections from the CDC did not help decrease the negative emotions and HPV vaccine hesitancy. This study extends prior research by investigating the effectiveness of second-layer correction comments, an increasingly common but underexamined form of misinformation correction strategy in the current interactive social media environments.
帖子之外:政治化的反疫苗错误信息评论的影响和社交媒体上纠正的挑战
尽管HPV疫苗在预防宫颈癌方面已被证明有效,但美国的疫苗接种率仍然很低,部分原因是父母的决定在很大程度上受到社交媒体上遇到的错误信息的影响。本研究采用在线实验设计(N = 1039),探讨了CDC帖子下政治化的反疫苗错误信息评论对家长疫苗接种犹豫的影响,以及这种影响的情绪机制。个体的认知需要(NFC)也被检验为调节因子。此外,我们探讨了CDC纠正是否有助于减轻这些负面影响。结果显示有调节的中介关系。暴露于政治化的反疫苗错误信息评论的参与者报告了更高的HPV疫苗犹豫,对原始职位的负面情绪介导了这种关联。然而,这种模式仅在低至中等水平的NFC参与者中观察到。对于NFC高的个体,负性情绪与疫苗犹豫的关系以及负性情绪的中介作用均不显著。CDC的更正并没有帮助减少负面情绪和对HPV疫苗的犹豫。本研究通过调查第二层纠正评论的有效性来扩展先前的研究,第二层纠正评论是当前互动社交媒体环境中越来越常见但未被充分研究的错误信息纠正策略形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信