The effect of state anxiety on jumping-to-conclusions bias in social anxiety: An experimental and computational modelling study

IF 4.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nicole Tan , Yiyun Shou , Junwen Chen , Bruce K. Christensen
{"title":"The effect of state anxiety on jumping-to-conclusions bias in social anxiety: An experimental and computational modelling study","authors":"Nicole Tan ,&nbsp;Yiyun Shou ,&nbsp;Junwen Chen ,&nbsp;Bruce K. Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research indicates that the tendency to make hasty decisions based on minimal information, also known as the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias, may be linked to social anxiety and could be exacerbated under high state anxiety, but this relationship is inconclusive due to a lack of consistent findings. The present study applied a Bayesian computational modelling approach alongside frequentist hypothesis testing to investigate the relationships between trait and state social anxiety and the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias across various beads tasks. An online experimental study involving 131 participants experiencing subclinical social anxiety revealed that higher trait social anxiety significantly attenuated one's belief updating in neutral situations when exposed to a state social anxiety induction. Conversely, higher trait social anxiety significantly increased belief updating about one's social performance, but this depended on the state social anxiety induction. No significant associations were found between trait and state social anxiety and observed dependent variables measured in the beads tasks. The implications are explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 104859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research indicates that the tendency to make hasty decisions based on minimal information, also known as the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias, may be linked to social anxiety and could be exacerbated under high state anxiety, but this relationship is inconclusive due to a lack of consistent findings. The present study applied a Bayesian computational modelling approach alongside frequentist hypothesis testing to investigate the relationships between trait and state social anxiety and the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias across various beads tasks. An online experimental study involving 131 participants experiencing subclinical social anxiety revealed that higher trait social anxiety significantly attenuated one's belief updating in neutral situations when exposed to a state social anxiety induction. Conversely, higher trait social anxiety significantly increased belief updating about one's social performance, but this depended on the state social anxiety induction. No significant associations were found between trait and state social anxiety and observed dependent variables measured in the beads tasks. The implications are explored.
状态焦虑对社交焦虑中跳脱结论偏见的影响:一项实验和计算模型研究
研究表明,基于极少信息仓促做出决定的倾向,也被称为“草率下结论偏见”,可能与社交焦虑有关,并且在高度焦虑状态下可能会加剧,但由于缺乏一致的研究结果,这种关系尚无定论。本研究采用贝叶斯计算建模方法和频率假设检验来研究特质和状态社交焦虑以及在各种珠子任务中直接得出结论的偏见之间的关系。一项涉及131名经历亚临床社交焦虑的参与者的在线实验研究表明,当暴露于状态社交焦虑诱导时,高特质社交焦虑显著减弱了一个人在中性情境下的信念更新。相反,高特质社交焦虑显著提高了个体对社会绩效的信念更新,但这取决于状态社交焦虑的诱导。在珠子任务中,特质和状态社会焦虑和观察到的因变量之间没有发现显著的关联。本文对其影响进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信