OCUS: A game-theoretic approach to optimal UAV coalitions in UAV-as-a-Service platforms

IF 4.8 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Prince Kumar , Akhand Pratap Narayan Singh , Anchal Dubey , Farid Nait-Abdesselam , Arijit Roy
{"title":"OCUS: A game-theoretic approach to optimal UAV coalitions in UAV-as-a-Service platforms","authors":"Prince Kumar ,&nbsp;Akhand Pratap Narayan Singh ,&nbsp;Anchal Dubey ,&nbsp;Farid Nait-Abdesselam ,&nbsp;Arijit Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.adhoc.2025.104030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents OCUS, an optimal coalition formation scheme designed to enhance the performance of UAV-as-a-Service (UaaS) platforms for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. UaaS platforms typically involve a set of heterogeneous UAVs owned by different entities. Serving IoT applications such as agriculture, traffic monitoring, and surveillance often requires multiple UAVs with diverse sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. Thus, forming an optimal coalition of these UAVs is essential for efficient resource utilization and application performance. Despite the growing interest in UAV-based services, existing literature lacks coalition formation schemes tailored for UaaS platform. To address this gap, OCUS leverages a coalition game-theoretic approach, where each UAV acts as a player in the game. The scheme introduces a selection score, which evaluates UAV owners based on reputation, cost competitiveness, and task allocation fairness. Using a payoff-driven method, OCUS promotes coalition stability and maximizes utility for UaaS platforms. The payoff function considers utility, reputation, task allocation fairness, costs, and equilibrium constraints. By employing Nash Equilibrium (NE) principles, OCUS ensures stable coalitions, discouraging UAVs from switching coalitions for higher payoffs. OCUS optimizes coalition formation by maximizing task completion rates, minimizing energy consumption, and ensuring fair and stable UAV participation through game-theoretic modeling. To evaluate OCUS, simulation experiments were conducted over 100 iterations involving 1 to 25 heterogeneous UAVs across a 50 × 50 unit<sup>2</sup> area, with varying distances and task counts (<span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>15</mn></mrow></math></span>). Simulation results demonstrate that OCUS achieves 25%–30% more stable coalitions compared to state-of-the-art approaches. Furthermore, NE principles enable OCUS to form coalitions that balance efficiency and fairness, advancing the capabilities of UaaS platforms in diverse IoT scenarios. OCUS offers promising applicability in real-world domains such as urban infrastructure management and emergency response, where adaptive and coordinated UAV operations can significantly enhance the delivery of services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55555,"journal":{"name":"Ad Hoc Networks","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 104030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ad Hoc Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870525002781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents OCUS, an optimal coalition formation scheme designed to enhance the performance of UAV-as-a-Service (UaaS) platforms for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. UaaS platforms typically involve a set of heterogeneous UAVs owned by different entities. Serving IoT applications such as agriculture, traffic monitoring, and surveillance often requires multiple UAVs with diverse sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. Thus, forming an optimal coalition of these UAVs is essential for efficient resource utilization and application performance. Despite the growing interest in UAV-based services, existing literature lacks coalition formation schemes tailored for UaaS platform. To address this gap, OCUS leverages a coalition game-theoretic approach, where each UAV acts as a player in the game. The scheme introduces a selection score, which evaluates UAV owners based on reputation, cost competitiveness, and task allocation fairness. Using a payoff-driven method, OCUS promotes coalition stability and maximizes utility for UaaS platforms. The payoff function considers utility, reputation, task allocation fairness, costs, and equilibrium constraints. By employing Nash Equilibrium (NE) principles, OCUS ensures stable coalitions, discouraging UAVs from switching coalitions for higher payoffs. OCUS optimizes coalition formation by maximizing task completion rates, minimizing energy consumption, and ensuring fair and stable UAV participation through game-theoretic modeling. To evaluate OCUS, simulation experiments were conducted over 100 iterations involving 1 to 25 heterogeneous UAVs across a 50 × 50 unit2 area, with varying distances and task counts (115). Simulation results demonstrate that OCUS achieves 25%–30% more stable coalitions compared to state-of-the-art approaches. Furthermore, NE principles enable OCUS to form coalitions that balance efficiency and fairness, advancing the capabilities of UaaS platforms in diverse IoT scenarios. OCUS offers promising applicability in real-world domains such as urban infrastructure management and emergency response, where adaptive and coordinated UAV operations can significantly enhance the delivery of services.
无人机即服务平台中最佳无人机联盟的博弈论方法
本文提出了OCUS,一种优化的联盟形成方案,旨在提高物联网(IoT)应用的无人机即服务(UaaS)平台的性能。无人机系统平台通常涉及由不同实体拥有的一组异构无人机。服务于农业、交通监控和监视等物联网应用通常需要多架具有不同传感、处理和通信能力的无人机。因此,形成这些无人机的最佳联盟对于有效利用资源和提高应用性能至关重要。尽管人们对基于无人机的服务越来越感兴趣,但现有文献缺乏针对无人机平台量身定制的联盟组建方案。为了解决这一差距,OCUS利用了一种联盟博弈论方法,其中每架无人机都在游戏中扮演一个玩家。该方案引入了一个选择分数,该分数基于声誉、成本竞争力和任务分配公平性来评估无人机所有者。OCUS采用收益驱动的方法,提高了联盟的稳定性,并最大化了UaaS平台的效用。收益函数考虑了效用、声誉、任务分配公平性、成本和均衡约束。通过采用纳什均衡(NE)原则,OCUS确保稳定的联盟,阻止无人机为了更高的收益而切换联盟。OCUS通过博弈论建模,通过最大化任务完成率、最小化能耗和确保公平稳定的无人机参与来优化联盟形成。为了评估OCUS,模拟实验进行了100多次迭代,涉及1到25架异构无人机,跨越50 × 50单元2区域,具有不同的距离和任务计数(1 - 15)。仿真结果表明,与最先进的方法相比,OCUS实现了25%-30%的稳定联盟。此外,网元原则使OCUS能够形成平衡效率和公平的联盟,从而提高在各种物联网场景下的UaaS平台的能力。OCUS在城市基础设施管理和应急响应等现实领域具有良好的适用性,在这些领域,自适应和协调的无人机操作可以显著增强服务的交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ad Hoc Networks
Ad Hoc Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Ad Hoc Networks is an international and archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in ad hoc and sensor networking areas. The Ad Hoc Networks considers original, high quality and unpublished contributions addressing all aspects of ad hoc and sensor networks. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Mobile and Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Sensor Networks Wireless Local and Personal Area Networks Home Networks Ad Hoc Networks of Autonomous Intelligent Systems Novel Architectures for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Self-organizing Network Architectures and Protocols Transport Layer Protocols Routing protocols (unicast, multicast, geocast, etc.) Media Access Control Techniques Error Control Schemes Power-Aware, Low-Power and Energy-Efficient Designs Synchronization and Scheduling Issues Mobility Management Mobility-Tolerant Communication Protocols Location Tracking and Location-based Services Resource and Information Management Security and Fault-Tolerance Issues Hardware and Software Platforms, Systems, and Testbeds Experimental and Prototype Results Quality-of-Service Issues Cross-Layer Interactions Scalability Issues Performance Analysis and Simulation of Protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信