From solar to storage: Case study for assessing massive use of small-scale lithium-ion batteries in residential sector

IF 7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Carlos Vargas-Salgado, David Alfonso-Solar, Tomás Gómez-Navarro, Dácil Díaz-Bello, Carla Montagud Montalvá
{"title":"From solar to storage: Case study for assessing massive use of small-scale lithium-ion batteries in residential sector","authors":"Carlos Vargas-Salgado,&nbsp;David Alfonso-Solar,&nbsp;Tomás Gómez-Navarro,&nbsp;Dácil Díaz-Bello,&nbsp;Carla Montagud Montalvá","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban photovoltaic (PV) systems enhance energy production. Still, widespread adoption can lead to fluctuations in energy prices (at different seasons and times), which drop during sunny periods and rise when solar power is unavailable. Nevertheless, using energy storage systems does not necessarily depend on the costs. Still, because of the random nature of primary (solar) energy, storage is required for PV generation systems to become an alternative solution to classic generation systems. While integrating energy storage systems can mitigate these fluctuations and enhance system reliability, high investment costs often challenge their implementation. The economic viability of battery systems in urban areas, including the residential sector, deviates from the trend observed in photovoltaic systems. This discrepancy can be attributed to the generally unprofitable nature of such systems from an economic standpoint. This study provides a methodology for assessing the use of massive lithium-ion battery systems in the residential sector. The methodology is applied to Valencia City but adaptable to other locations, employing tools such PVGIS to obtain the energy demand of the city, HOMER to carry out the economic analysis, PVGIs to estimate the solar resources, and QGis to estimate the available rooftop.</div><div>The results reveal that Valencia’s residential rooftops offer 392  MW of PV and 469 MWh of storage potential, covering 66 % of demand. Mid-rise buildings (5–8 floors) dominate capacity, while low-rise buildings (2–3 floors) achieve 95 % energy self-sufficiency. High-rise buildings cover only 36 %. Payback periods range from 4–14 years, with IRRs of 17–23 %. LCOE varies from 13 to 25 c€/kWh, with low-rise and high-rise buildings facing higher costs due to scale and space limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 104602"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825004333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban photovoltaic (PV) systems enhance energy production. Still, widespread adoption can lead to fluctuations in energy prices (at different seasons and times), which drop during sunny periods and rise when solar power is unavailable. Nevertheless, using energy storage systems does not necessarily depend on the costs. Still, because of the random nature of primary (solar) energy, storage is required for PV generation systems to become an alternative solution to classic generation systems. While integrating energy storage systems can mitigate these fluctuations and enhance system reliability, high investment costs often challenge their implementation. The economic viability of battery systems in urban areas, including the residential sector, deviates from the trend observed in photovoltaic systems. This discrepancy can be attributed to the generally unprofitable nature of such systems from an economic standpoint. This study provides a methodology for assessing the use of massive lithium-ion battery systems in the residential sector. The methodology is applied to Valencia City but adaptable to other locations, employing tools such PVGIS to obtain the energy demand of the city, HOMER to carry out the economic analysis, PVGIs to estimate the solar resources, and QGis to estimate the available rooftop.
The results reveal that Valencia’s residential rooftops offer 392  MW of PV and 469 MWh of storage potential, covering 66 % of demand. Mid-rise buildings (5–8 floors) dominate capacity, while low-rise buildings (2–3 floors) achieve 95 % energy self-sufficiency. High-rise buildings cover only 36 %. Payback periods range from 4–14 years, with IRRs of 17–23 %. LCOE varies from 13 to 25 c€/kWh, with low-rise and high-rise buildings facing higher costs due to scale and space limitations.
从太阳能到储能:评估小型锂离子电池在住宅部门大规模使用的案例研究
城市光伏系统提高了能源生产。然而,广泛采用太阳能会导致能源价格的波动(在不同的季节和时间),在阳光充足的时候价格会下降,而在没有太阳能的时候价格会上升。然而,使用储能系统并不一定取决于成本。然而,由于初级(太阳能)能源的随机性,光伏发电系统要成为传统发电系统的替代解决方案,就需要存储。虽然集成储能系统可以缓解这些波动并提高系统可靠性,但高昂的投资成本往往是实施储能系统的挑战。在城市地区,包括住宅部门,电池系统的经济可行性偏离了在光电系统中观察到的趋势。从经济角度来看,这种差异可归因于这种系统通常无利可图的性质。本研究提供了一种评估大规模锂离子电池系统在住宅部门使用的方法。该方法适用于瓦伦西亚市,但也适用于其他地区,使用PVGIS等工具获得城市的能源需求,HOMER进行经济分析,PVGIS估计太阳能资源,QGis估计可用屋顶。结果显示,瓦伦西亚的住宅屋顶提供了392兆瓦的光伏和469兆瓦时的存储潜力,覆盖了66%的需求。中层建筑(5-8层)占主导地位,而低层建筑(2-3层)实现了95%的能源自给率。高层建筑仅占36%。投资回收期为4-14年,内部收益率为17 - 23%。LCOE从13到25 c€/kWh不等,低层和高层建筑由于规模和空间限制而面临更高的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信