A genetic programming model for estimating the rock mass deformation modulus based on analytical parameters and in situ stress

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mohammad Reza Shahverdiloo, Shokrollah Zare
{"title":"A genetic programming model for estimating the rock mass deformation modulus based on analytical parameters and in situ stress","authors":"Mohammad Reza Shahverdiloo,&nbsp;Shokrollah Zare","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus (<span><math><msub><mtext>D</mtext><mtext>f</mtext></msub></math></span>) has a history of nearly half a century with empirical models. However, reliable estimation of <span><math><msub><mtext>D</mtext><mtext>f</mtext></msub></math></span> has been a challenging task due to the theoretical background of input parameters and data analysis methods. Analytical models present the principal input parameters; however, according to this study, the concept of principal input parameters (PIP) was developed with an emphasis on in situ stress. A review of seventy empirical models revealed that the majority of existing models suffer from a lack of PIP. Moreover, based on the geological strength index, confined Young’s modulus, and shear and normal joint stiffness at specified normal stress, the deformation modulus is forecasted by a new multigene genetic programming (MGP) as an optimal mathematical relationship in terms of fitness functions. A comparison of the estimated deformation modulus with several existing empirical models based on the same database, seventy-nine valid data sets of different rock types, shows the superiority of the new MGP in terms of residual average and fitness function (RMS and <span><math><msup><mrow><mtext>R</mtext></mrow><mtext>2</mtext></msup></math></span>). Furthermore, the Earth’s crust stress impact on <span><math><msub><mtext>D</mtext><mtext>f</mtext></msub></math></span> was numerically simulated through 3DEC, based on a plate jacking test, in which only the azimuth of the main horizontal in situ stress changed consecutively to achieve the calculated deformation modulus based on the model’s displacement at the extensometer anchor points. The integration of PIP’s concept with the MGP model improves the global acceptability of empirical models in analytical and numerical stability analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107073"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus (Df) has a history of nearly half a century with empirical models. However, reliable estimation of Df has been a challenging task due to the theoretical background of input parameters and data analysis methods. Analytical models present the principal input parameters; however, according to this study, the concept of principal input parameters (PIP) was developed with an emphasis on in situ stress. A review of seventy empirical models revealed that the majority of existing models suffer from a lack of PIP. Moreover, based on the geological strength index, confined Young’s modulus, and shear and normal joint stiffness at specified normal stress, the deformation modulus is forecasted by a new multigene genetic programming (MGP) as an optimal mathematical relationship in terms of fitness functions. A comparison of the estimated deformation modulus with several existing empirical models based on the same database, seventy-nine valid data sets of different rock types, shows the superiority of the new MGP in terms of residual average and fitness function (RMS and R2). Furthermore, the Earth’s crust stress impact on Df was numerically simulated through 3DEC, based on a plate jacking test, in which only the azimuth of the main horizontal in situ stress changed consecutively to achieve the calculated deformation modulus based on the model’s displacement at the extensometer anchor points. The integration of PIP’s concept with the MGP model improves the global acceptability of empirical models in analytical and numerical stability analyses.
基于解析参数和地应力估计岩体变形模量的遗传规划模型
用经验模型估计岩体变形模量Df已有近半个世纪的历史。然而,由于输入参数和数据分析方法的理论背景,可靠的Df估计一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。解析模型给出了主要输入参数;然而,根据这项研究,主输入参数(PIP)的概念是发展的,重点是原位应力。对70个经验模型的回顾表明,大多数现有模型都缺乏PIP。此外,基于地质强度指标、约束杨氏模量以及节理和节理在规定正应力下的剪切和法向刚度,利用新的多基因遗传规划(MGP)作为适应度函数的最优数学关系对变形模量进行了预测。通过与现有的基于同一数据库、79组不同岩石类型的有效数据集的经验模型进行比较,表明新模型在残差平均值和适应度函数(RMS和R2)方面具有优越性。在顶板试验的基础上,通过3DEC数值模拟地壳应力对Df的影响,其中只有主水平地应力方位角连续变化,以模型在延伸仪锚点处的位移为基础计算变形模量。PIP的概念与MGP模型的整合提高了经验模型在分析和数值稳定性分析中的全球可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信