Luís Fernando Costa Garrido , Ruan R. Daros , Bianca Vandresen , Courtney Graham , Beth A. Ventura
{"title":"Watch dogs: A mixed-methods investigation of dog owners’ views on dog monitoring technologies","authors":"Luís Fernando Costa Garrido , Ruan R. Daros , Bianca Vandresen , Courtney Graham , Beth A. Ventura","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dog monitoring technologies are increasingly integrated into dog owners’ routines, yet the perceived impacts of these technologies on dogs and their owners remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of dog owners (<em>n</em> = 86) regarding use and impacts of these technologies through a mixed-methods questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to identify owners’ reasons for adopting dog monitoring technologies and their perceived impacts. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively and associations of perceived impacts with owner demographics, dog characteristics, technology characteristics and scores on the Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale were assessed using mixed-effect logistic regression models. Five main themes were identified as reasons for adopting and using technologies: 1) monitoring dog safety, 2) monitoring dog behavior, 3) monitoring dog health or disease, 4) owner-related factors, and 5) miscellaneous reasons. Perceived positive impacts on dogs included improved care and increased off-leash opportunities, while negative impacts involved owners’ low trust in the technology’s reliability and concerns about dog behavioral issues and discomfort. Most owners identified a positive impact on themselves, including reduced anxiety and enhanced self-assessed pet parenting. Stress and financial concerns were mentioned as negative effects. No associations were found between quantitative variables and perceived positive or negative impacts. The findings underscore the importance of considering both the benefits and potential drawbacks of these technologies to ensure their ethical and effective integration into the lives of dogs and the humans who care for them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 103645"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581925002022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dog monitoring technologies are increasingly integrated into dog owners’ routines, yet the perceived impacts of these technologies on dogs and their owners remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of dog owners (n = 86) regarding use and impacts of these technologies through a mixed-methods questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to identify owners’ reasons for adopting dog monitoring technologies and their perceived impacts. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively and associations of perceived impacts with owner demographics, dog characteristics, technology characteristics and scores on the Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale were assessed using mixed-effect logistic regression models. Five main themes were identified as reasons for adopting and using technologies: 1) monitoring dog safety, 2) monitoring dog behavior, 3) monitoring dog health or disease, 4) owner-related factors, and 5) miscellaneous reasons. Perceived positive impacts on dogs included improved care and increased off-leash opportunities, while negative impacts involved owners’ low trust in the technology’s reliability and concerns about dog behavioral issues and discomfort. Most owners identified a positive impact on themselves, including reduced anxiety and enhanced self-assessed pet parenting. Stress and financial concerns were mentioned as negative effects. No associations were found between quantitative variables and perceived positive or negative impacts. The findings underscore the importance of considering both the benefits and potential drawbacks of these technologies to ensure their ethical and effective integration into the lives of dogs and the humans who care for them.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities.
Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to:
• Innovative interaction techniques
• Multimodal interaction
• Speech interaction
• Graphic interaction
• Natural language interaction
• Interaction in mobile and embedded systems
• Interface design and evaluation methodologies
• Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems
• User interface prototyping and management systems
• Ubiquitous computing
• Wearable computers
• Pervasive computing
• Affective computing
• Empirical studies of user behaviour
• Empirical studies of programming and software engineering
• Computer supported cooperative work
• Computer mediated communication
• Virtual reality
• Mixed and augmented Reality
• Intelligent user interfaces
• Presence
...