Feasibility of automatic knee kinematic feature learning for discriminating between individuals with and without a history of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Benjamin R. Butler , Behnam Gholami , Benedict Z.W. Low , Qichang Mei , David Hollinger , Zainab Altai , David W. Evans , Bernard X.W. Liew
{"title":"Feasibility of automatic knee kinematic feature learning for discriminating between individuals with and without a history of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","authors":"Benjamin R. Butler , Behnam Gholami , Benedict Z.W. Low , Qichang Mei , David Hollinger , Zainab Altai , David W. Evans , Bernard X.W. Liew","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that often develops following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, even following surgical reconstruction (ACLr). This research evaluated whether biomechanical biomarkers, derived from wearable sensors, could differentiate people with an ACLr, who are at risk of early knee osteoarthritis, from healthy controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twelve participants with an ACLr and 19 controls participated. Continuous three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematics were captured using inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors during sequential daily living tasks comprising sit-to-stand, walking, obstacle crossing, squatting, and stand-to-sit. Using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model, 468 knee time-series features were extracted to classify individuals with an ACLr from controls. Cohen's <em>d</em> effect sizes were calculated for features selected by the regression model to quantify between-group differences.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The model achieved an accuracy of 80.7 %, with 92 % sensitivity and 74 % specificity. Seven features were retained from the model. The top two features with the greatest effect sizes when compared to controls were: a reduction in peak-to-peak knee axial rotation and maximum knee axial rotation angle (<em>d</em> = 1.35 and <em>d</em> = 1.31, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The present study found that axial knee kinematics could serve as important biomarkers of an ACLr, potentially representing a modifiable feature for osteoarthritis treatment and prevention. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of early knee osteoarthritis detection using biomechanical biomarkers, providing preliminary evidence for the use of wearable sensors outside clinical settings and underscoring the possibilities for at-home monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 106673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325002463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that often develops following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, even following surgical reconstruction (ACLr). This research evaluated whether biomechanical biomarkers, derived from wearable sensors, could differentiate people with an ACLr, who are at risk of early knee osteoarthritis, from healthy controls.
Methods
Twelve participants with an ACLr and 19 controls participated. Continuous three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematics were captured using inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors during sequential daily living tasks comprising sit-to-stand, walking, obstacle crossing, squatting, and stand-to-sit. Using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model, 468 knee time-series features were extracted to classify individuals with an ACLr from controls. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for features selected by the regression model to quantify between-group differences.
Findings
The model achieved an accuracy of 80.7 %, with 92 % sensitivity and 74 % specificity. Seven features were retained from the model. The top two features with the greatest effect sizes when compared to controls were: a reduction in peak-to-peak knee axial rotation and maximum knee axial rotation angle (d = 1.35 and d = 1.31, respectively).
Interpretation
The present study found that axial knee kinematics could serve as important biomarkers of an ACLr, potentially representing a modifiable feature for osteoarthritis treatment and prevention. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of early knee osteoarthritis detection using biomechanical biomarkers, providing preliminary evidence for the use of wearable sensors outside clinical settings and underscoring the possibilities for at-home monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.