Picking up the slack: Faith-based organizations, informal support networks and energy insecurity, poverty, and vulnerability in the southeastern United States

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Elena Louder , Conor Harrison , Nikki Luke
{"title":"Picking up the slack: Faith-based organizations, informal support networks and energy insecurity, poverty, and vulnerability in the southeastern United States","authors":"Elena Louder ,&nbsp;Conor Harrison ,&nbsp;Nikki Luke","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on energy insecurity has boomed. However, energy assistance, an essential piece of the energy insecurity puzzle, is neglected in existing literature. Furthermore, extant literature focuses mostly on official sources of assistance funded through federal programs. In this paper, we contend that current research paints a limited picture of the landscape of assistance. Based on qualitative interviews with assistance providers and households in five energy vulnerable communities in South Carolina and Tennessee, we present a more complete panorama of the places people turn to for help. We find that while federal programs serve a small number of those in need, many people turn to informal networks such as family, churches, and faith-based organizations as primary sources of assistance. We analyze this reliance on informal networks and faith-based organizations as part and parcel of the dismantling of the welfare state and downshifting of responsibility in the context of neoliberalization. These findings advance debates in energy vulnerability literature in two ways. First, we argue that this more comprehensive understanding of where people turn for help opens the door to a political critique of growing energy vulnerability as a symptom of neoliberal social policy and the erosion of social reproduction. Second, we argue that current scholarly approaches which rely on quantitative modeling to describe the landscape of energy vulnerability are usefully complemented by a broader range of methodological and theoretical approaches. We need rich, qualitative data to move beyond description and towards more critical, and political understanding and advocacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on energy insecurity has boomed. However, energy assistance, an essential piece of the energy insecurity puzzle, is neglected in existing literature. Furthermore, extant literature focuses mostly on official sources of assistance funded through federal programs. In this paper, we contend that current research paints a limited picture of the landscape of assistance. Based on qualitative interviews with assistance providers and households in five energy vulnerable communities in South Carolina and Tennessee, we present a more complete panorama of the places people turn to for help. We find that while federal programs serve a small number of those in need, many people turn to informal networks such as family, churches, and faith-based organizations as primary sources of assistance. We analyze this reliance on informal networks and faith-based organizations as part and parcel of the dismantling of the welfare state and downshifting of responsibility in the context of neoliberalization. These findings advance debates in energy vulnerability literature in two ways. First, we argue that this more comprehensive understanding of where people turn for help opens the door to a political critique of growing energy vulnerability as a symptom of neoliberal social policy and the erosion of social reproduction. Second, we argue that current scholarly approaches which rely on quantitative modeling to describe the landscape of energy vulnerability are usefully complemented by a broader range of methodological and theoretical approaches. We need rich, qualitative data to move beyond description and towards more critical, and political understanding and advocacy.
收拾残部:美国东南部以信仰为基础的组织、非正式的支持网络和能源不安全、贫困和脆弱性
对能源不安全的研究蓬勃发展。然而,能源援助这一能源不安全难题的重要组成部分在现有文献中被忽视了。此外,现存文献主要集中于通过联邦项目资助的官方援助来源。在本文中,我们认为目前的研究描绘了一幅有限的援助图景。基于对南卡罗来纳州和田纳西州五个能源脆弱社区的援助提供者和家庭的定性访谈,我们呈现了人们求助的更完整的全景。我们发现,虽然联邦项目为少数有需要的人提供服务,但许多人将家庭、教堂和信仰组织等非正式网络作为主要的援助来源。我们分析了这种对非正式网络和基于信仰的组织的依赖,认为这是新自由主义背景下福利国家解体和责任弱化的重要组成部分。这些发现从两个方面推进了能源脆弱性文献中的争论。首先,我们认为,这种对人们向何处求助的更全面的理解,为对日益增长的能源脆弱性作为新自由主义社会政策和社会再生产侵蚀的症状进行政治批评打开了大门。其次,我们认为,目前依靠定量建模来描述能源脆弱性景观的学术方法可以得到更广泛的方法和理论方法的有益补充。我们需要丰富的定性数据,以超越描述,走向更具批判性和政治性的理解和倡导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信