Picking up the slack: Faith-based organizations, informal support networks and energy insecurity, poverty, and vulnerability in the southeastern United States
{"title":"Picking up the slack: Faith-based organizations, informal support networks and energy insecurity, poverty, and vulnerability in the southeastern United States","authors":"Elena Louder , Conor Harrison , Nikki Luke","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on energy insecurity has boomed. However, energy assistance, an essential piece of the energy insecurity puzzle, is neglected in existing literature. Furthermore, extant literature focuses mostly on official sources of assistance funded through federal programs. In this paper, we contend that current research paints a limited picture of the landscape of assistance. Based on qualitative interviews with assistance providers and households in five energy vulnerable communities in South Carolina and Tennessee, we present a more complete panorama of the places people turn to for help. We find that while federal programs serve a small number of those in need, many people turn to informal networks such as family, churches, and faith-based organizations as primary sources of assistance. We analyze this reliance on informal networks and faith-based organizations as part and parcel of the dismantling of the welfare state and downshifting of responsibility in the context of neoliberalization. These findings advance debates in energy vulnerability literature in two ways. First, we argue that this more comprehensive understanding of where people turn for help opens the door to a political critique of growing energy vulnerability as a symptom of neoliberal social policy and the erosion of social reproduction. Second, we argue that current scholarly approaches which rely on quantitative modeling to describe the landscape of energy vulnerability are usefully complemented by a broader range of methodological and theoretical approaches. We need rich, qualitative data to move beyond description and towards more critical, and political understanding and advocacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on energy insecurity has boomed. However, energy assistance, an essential piece of the energy insecurity puzzle, is neglected in existing literature. Furthermore, extant literature focuses mostly on official sources of assistance funded through federal programs. In this paper, we contend that current research paints a limited picture of the landscape of assistance. Based on qualitative interviews with assistance providers and households in five energy vulnerable communities in South Carolina and Tennessee, we present a more complete panorama of the places people turn to for help. We find that while federal programs serve a small number of those in need, many people turn to informal networks such as family, churches, and faith-based organizations as primary sources of assistance. We analyze this reliance on informal networks and faith-based organizations as part and parcel of the dismantling of the welfare state and downshifting of responsibility in the context of neoliberalization. These findings advance debates in energy vulnerability literature in two ways. First, we argue that this more comprehensive understanding of where people turn for help opens the door to a political critique of growing energy vulnerability as a symptom of neoliberal social policy and the erosion of social reproduction. Second, we argue that current scholarly approaches which rely on quantitative modeling to describe the landscape of energy vulnerability are usefully complemented by a broader range of methodological and theoretical approaches. We need rich, qualitative data to move beyond description and towards more critical, and political understanding and advocacy.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.