Naresh Kumar Goud Ranga , S.K. Gugulothu , P. Gandhi , Raju Muthyala , G. Sailaja
{"title":"Numerical investigation of wall geometry effects on thermal performance of CuO-enhanced phase change materials for latent heat storage","authors":"Naresh Kumar Goud Ranga , S.K. Gugulothu , P. Gandhi , Raju Muthyala , G. Sailaja","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The need for compact, fast-charging thermal energy storage (TES) systems is critical for applications such as solar collectors, battery cooling, and electronic thermal regulation. However, conventional phase change materials (PCMs) suffer from low thermal conductivity and non-uniform melting, which limit their efficiency and response time. To address these limitations, this study numerically investigates the synergistic effect of wall geometry modification and nanoparticle enhancement on the melting performance of RT42 paraffin PCM embedded with 4 wt% CuO nanoparticles. A two-dimensional rectangular enclosure (50 mm × 100 mm) with constant cross-sectional area (5000 mm<sup>2</sup>) is subjected to lateral heat flux (1000 W/m<sup>2</sup>) across five optimized wall profiles and a reference geometry. Using the enthalpy-porosity method, the melting dynamics and thermal energy storage performance are evaluated. CuO addition enhances thermal conductivity from 0.15 to 0.45 W/m·K. Model validation shows <2 % deviation in liquid fraction, confirming accuracy. Among all designs, Cases IV and V (inclined and extended walls) demonstrate superior performance: 98–100 % liquid fraction at 7000 s, 25 % higher energy storage (25 kJ), and average temperature elevation to 305.1 K compared to 303.8 K in the reference case. The novelty of this work lies in the integrated evaluation of thermal boundary design and nanoparticle-enhanced PCM under identical heat flux and volume constraints—a rarely explored combination in literature. This study motivates the adoption of dual enhancement strategies to overcome PCM limitations and informs the development of next-generation TES modules with improved efficiency, thermal uniformity, and melting rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 104138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The need for compact, fast-charging thermal energy storage (TES) systems is critical for applications such as solar collectors, battery cooling, and electronic thermal regulation. However, conventional phase change materials (PCMs) suffer from low thermal conductivity and non-uniform melting, which limit their efficiency and response time. To address these limitations, this study numerically investigates the synergistic effect of wall geometry modification and nanoparticle enhancement on the melting performance of RT42 paraffin PCM embedded with 4 wt% CuO nanoparticles. A two-dimensional rectangular enclosure (50 mm × 100 mm) with constant cross-sectional area (5000 mm2) is subjected to lateral heat flux (1000 W/m2) across five optimized wall profiles and a reference geometry. Using the enthalpy-porosity method, the melting dynamics and thermal energy storage performance are evaluated. CuO addition enhances thermal conductivity from 0.15 to 0.45 W/m·K. Model validation shows <2 % deviation in liquid fraction, confirming accuracy. Among all designs, Cases IV and V (inclined and extended walls) demonstrate superior performance: 98–100 % liquid fraction at 7000 s, 25 % higher energy storage (25 kJ), and average temperature elevation to 305.1 K compared to 303.8 K in the reference case. The novelty of this work lies in the integrated evaluation of thermal boundary design and nanoparticle-enhanced PCM under identical heat flux and volume constraints—a rarely explored combination in literature. This study motivates the adoption of dual enhancement strategies to overcome PCM limitations and informs the development of next-generation TES modules with improved efficiency, thermal uniformity, and melting rate.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.