Integrated process optimization and life cycle analysis (LCA)-economic assessment for sustainable treatment of arsenic and fluoride-contaminated groundwater with co-existing iron

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Hemant Goyal, Prasenjit Mondal
{"title":"Integrated process optimization and life cycle analysis (LCA)-economic assessment for sustainable treatment of arsenic and fluoride-contaminated groundwater with co-existing iron","authors":"Hemant Goyal,&nbsp;Prasenjit Mondal","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present work determined the influence of co-existing iron on the performance of the electrocoagulation (EC) process for the sustainable treatment of arsenic and fluoride-contaminated groundwater. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to investigate the influence of arsenic (0.1–1.0 ppm), fluoride (2–6 ppm) and iron (0.5–1.5 ppm) concentrations, residence time (10–120 min), and current (0.2–0.8 A) on arsenic and fluoride removals. Further, predictive models were developed using RSM. Life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluated the environmental impacts, while genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization (GA-MOO) addressed the conflicting goals of maximizing the removals and minimizing environmental and economic burdens. This approach helps to make the treatment align with sustainable development goals (SDG-6, 12 and 13). The optimized conditions for water treatment with 0.55 ppm As, 1 ppm Fe and 6 ppm F<sup>-</sup> are current 0.22 A and residence time 110.14 min, with 99.20 % arsenic and 93.82 % fluoride removals. The presence/addition of iron reduced electro-dissolved aluminium and electricity requirements by 50 % compared to iron-free water. LCA shows a significant reduction in environmental impacts with the increase in iron concentration in all the impact categories. The economic evaluation has shown a substantial reduction in treatment cost with an increase in iron concentration, demonstrating the economic viability of the EC process with co-existing iron. Characterization of the sludge using XRD, FESEM, EDX, XRF, and XPS confirmed the presence of contaminants, offering insights into the mechanisms responsible for their removal. Therefore, findings of this study highlight the efficient performance of the EC process with co-existing iron as an efficient and economical solution for groundwater treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107907"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025011747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work determined the influence of co-existing iron on the performance of the electrocoagulation (EC) process for the sustainable treatment of arsenic and fluoride-contaminated groundwater. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to investigate the influence of arsenic (0.1–1.0 ppm), fluoride (2–6 ppm) and iron (0.5–1.5 ppm) concentrations, residence time (10–120 min), and current (0.2–0.8 A) on arsenic and fluoride removals. Further, predictive models were developed using RSM. Life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluated the environmental impacts, while genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization (GA-MOO) addressed the conflicting goals of maximizing the removals and minimizing environmental and economic burdens. This approach helps to make the treatment align with sustainable development goals (SDG-6, 12 and 13). The optimized conditions for water treatment with 0.55 ppm As, 1 ppm Fe and 6 ppm F- are current 0.22 A and residence time 110.14 min, with 99.20 % arsenic and 93.82 % fluoride removals. The presence/addition of iron reduced electro-dissolved aluminium and electricity requirements by 50 % compared to iron-free water. LCA shows a significant reduction in environmental impacts with the increase in iron concentration in all the impact categories. The economic evaluation has shown a substantial reduction in treatment cost with an increase in iron concentration, demonstrating the economic viability of the EC process with co-existing iron. Characterization of the sludge using XRD, FESEM, EDX, XRF, and XPS confirmed the presence of contaminants, offering insights into the mechanisms responsible for their removal. Therefore, findings of this study highlight the efficient performance of the EC process with co-existing iron as an efficient and economical solution for groundwater treatment.
综合工艺优化和生命周期分析(LCA)-含铁共存地下水可持续处理的经济评价
本研究确定了共存铁对可持续处理砷和氟化物污染地下水的电混凝(EC)工艺性能的影响。采用响应面法(RSM)研究了砷(0.1 ~ 1.0 ppm)、氟(2 ~ 6 ppm)和铁(0.5 ~ 1.5 ppm)浓度、停留时间(10 ~ 120 min)和电流(0.2 ~ 0.8 A)对砷和氟去除率的影响。进一步,利用RSM建立了预测模型。生命周期评估(LCA)评估了环境影响,而基于遗传算法的多目标优化(GA-MOO)解决了最大化去除量和最小化环境和经济负担的冲突目标。这种方法有助于使治疗符合可持续发展目标(可持续发展目标6、12和13)。以0.55 ppm As、1 ppm Fe和6 ppm F-处理水的最佳条件为电流0.22 A,停留时间110.14 min,砷去除率为99.20% %,氟去除率为93.82% %。与不含铁的水相比,铁的存在/添加减少了电溶铝和电力需求50% %。LCA表明,随着所有影响类别中铁浓度的增加,环境影响显著减少。经济评估表明,随着铁浓度的增加,处理成本大幅降低,证明了EC工艺与共存铁的经济可行性。利用XRD、FESEM、EDX、XRF和XPS对污泥进行表征,确认了污染物的存在,并为去除污染物的机制提供了见解。因此,本研究的结果突出了EC工艺与共存铁的高效性能,作为一种高效经济的地下水处理解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信