{"title":"Exploring mining extraction dynamics in Africa: A Hotelling model perspective with non-linear costs","authors":"Sassire Napo , Didier Tatoutchoup , Eloi Somtinda Sondo","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper assesses the applicability of the Hotelling model to non-renewable resource extraction in Africa by examining seven key minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron, nickel, phosphate, and tin) across 18 major producing countries. Our findings systematically reject the Hotelling model’s predictions: estimated discount rates are significantly negative across most countries and commodities, contradicting the theoretical assumption of intertemporal profit maximization. Furthermore, observed depletion times (averaging 105 years) fall markedly short of theoretical optima (240–256 years), suggesting systemic over-extraction. Results vary substantially by mineral and country, with phosphate reserves (e.g., Morocco) showing slower depletion, while copper and gold sectors (e.g., DRC, Ghana) exhibit faster extraction. These deviations suggest that the Hotelling model may be inadequate for capturing the complex realities of resource extraction in developing economies, where factors such as widespread illegal mining, institutional rigidities, political instability, and regulatory weaknesses that facilitate resource predation create different optimization conditions than those assumed by the classical model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 105745"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper assesses the applicability of the Hotelling model to non-renewable resource extraction in Africa by examining seven key minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron, nickel, phosphate, and tin) across 18 major producing countries. Our findings systematically reject the Hotelling model’s predictions: estimated discount rates are significantly negative across most countries and commodities, contradicting the theoretical assumption of intertemporal profit maximization. Furthermore, observed depletion times (averaging 105 years) fall markedly short of theoretical optima (240–256 years), suggesting systemic over-extraction. Results vary substantially by mineral and country, with phosphate reserves (e.g., Morocco) showing slower depletion, while copper and gold sectors (e.g., DRC, Ghana) exhibit faster extraction. These deviations suggest that the Hotelling model may be inadequate for capturing the complex realities of resource extraction in developing economies, where factors such as widespread illegal mining, institutional rigidities, political instability, and regulatory weaknesses that facilitate resource predation create different optimization conditions than those assumed by the classical model.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.