Gas-phase pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of lithium-ion battery electrolyte components: difference from liquid-based fire hazard classification

IF 5 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Keisuke Kanayama, Kaoru Maruta, Hisashi Nakamura
{"title":"Gas-phase pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of lithium-ion battery electrolyte components: difference from liquid-based fire hazard classification","authors":"Keisuke Kanayama,&nbsp;Kaoru Maruta,&nbsp;Hisashi Nakamura","doi":"10.1016/j.jaecs.2025.100396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fire safety has become a more serious concern for lithium-ion battery (LIB) applications with their market growth to various usage and operation conditions, especially in the energy and transportation sectors. A well-recognized fire hazard classification of LIB electrolyte solvents is determined based on the liquid phase that strongly reflects phase change properties. This study poses a difference in the potential fire hazard of LIB electrolyte solvents depending on liquid-/gas-phase properties considered by demonstrating fundamental gas-phase pyrolysis and combustion simulations. By assuming a LIB fire scenario where vaporized electrolyte solvents are present, pyrolysis in a perfectly stirred reactor, laminar flame speeds and ignition delay times were simulated for commercially used carbonate ester mixtures, ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC), EC/ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) and EC/diethyl carbonate (DEC), using a chemical kinetic model. Pyrolysis simulations indicated that at “low” temperatures (≲ 600 K), even after 1000 s, which could be attainable during a thermal runaway event, carbonate esters are still dominant components but not pyrolysis products, such as H<sub>2</sub>/CO/CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> for DMC and CO<sub>2</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>/alcohol for EMC and DEC cases. Simulated laminar flame speeds of EC/DMC/air mixtures were lower than those of EC/EMC/air and EC/DEC/air mixtures at 500 K, having a good correlation with a transport parameter, i.e., thermal diffusivity. The relative fire hazard of LIB electrolyte solvents in terms of gas-phase combustion based on laminar flame speed is opposite to that of liquid-phase classification. A proper flammability classification and key combustion properties need to be considered depending on the expected LIB fire situation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100104,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100396"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X25000779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fire safety has become a more serious concern for lithium-ion battery (LIB) applications with their market growth to various usage and operation conditions, especially in the energy and transportation sectors. A well-recognized fire hazard classification of LIB electrolyte solvents is determined based on the liquid phase that strongly reflects phase change properties. This study poses a difference in the potential fire hazard of LIB electrolyte solvents depending on liquid-/gas-phase properties considered by demonstrating fundamental gas-phase pyrolysis and combustion simulations. By assuming a LIB fire scenario where vaporized electrolyte solvents are present, pyrolysis in a perfectly stirred reactor, laminar flame speeds and ignition delay times were simulated for commercially used carbonate ester mixtures, ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC), EC/ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) and EC/diethyl carbonate (DEC), using a chemical kinetic model. Pyrolysis simulations indicated that at “low” temperatures (≲ 600 K), even after 1000 s, which could be attainable during a thermal runaway event, carbonate esters are still dominant components but not pyrolysis products, such as H2/CO/CO2/CH4 for DMC and CO2/C2H4/alcohol for EMC and DEC cases. Simulated laminar flame speeds of EC/DMC/air mixtures were lower than those of EC/EMC/air and EC/DEC/air mixtures at 500 K, having a good correlation with a transport parameter, i.e., thermal diffusivity. The relative fire hazard of LIB electrolyte solvents in terms of gas-phase combustion based on laminar flame speed is opposite to that of liquid-phase classification. A proper flammability classification and key combustion properties need to be considered depending on the expected LIB fire situation.
锂离子电池电解液组分气相热解燃烧特性:与液基火灾危险性分类的区别
随着锂离子电池(LIB)在各种使用和操作条件下的市场增长,尤其是在能源和交通领域,消防安全已成为锂离子电池应用的一个更严重的问题。锂离子电池电解质溶剂的火灾危险分类是根据强烈反映相变特性的液相来确定的。本研究通过基本的气相热解和燃烧模拟,得出了锂离子电池电解质溶剂的液/气相性质不同,其潜在火灾危险也不同。采用化学动力学模型,模拟了碳酸乙烯酯(EC)/碳酸二甲酯(DMC)、EC/碳酸甲酯乙酯(EMC)和EC/碳酸二乙酯(DEC)等商用碳酸酯混合物的层流火焰速度和点火延迟时间。热解模拟表明,在“低温”(> 600 K)下,即使在1000 s后,碳酸酯仍然是主要组分,而不是热解产物,如DMC的H2/CO/CO2/CH4, EMC和DEC的CO2/C2H4/醇。在500 K时,EC/DMC/空气混合物的模拟层流火焰速度低于EC/EMC/空气和EC/DEC/空气混合物的模拟层流火焰速度,这与传递参数即热扩散系数有很好的相关性。基于层流火焰速度的锂离子电池电解质溶剂气相燃烧的相对火灾危险性与液相分类相反。根据预期的LIB火灾情况,需要考虑适当的可燃性分类和关键的燃烧特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信