Too proud to doubt? The relationship between narcissism and intellectual humility

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Marcin Zajenkowski , Wacław Bąk , Virgil Zeigler-Hill , Jeremiasz Górniak , Jerzy Wojciechowski , Michał Stefanowicz
{"title":"Too proud to doubt? The relationship between narcissism and intellectual humility","authors":"Marcin Zajenkowski ,&nbsp;Wacław Bąk ,&nbsp;Virgil Zeigler-Hill ,&nbsp;Jeremiasz Górniak ,&nbsp;Jerzy Wojciechowski ,&nbsp;Michał Stefanowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While narcissism and intellectual humility may seem incompatible, their relationship is more complex due to their multidimensional nature. Across two studies (<em>N</em><sub>1</sub> = 219, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 23.47; <em>SD<sub>age</sub></em> = 8.37; <em>N<sub>2</sub> =</em> 278, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 21.96; <em>SD<sub>age</sub></em> = 4.12; participants recruited through social networking websites), we examined links between three narcissism facets (agentic, antagonistic, neurotic) and four aspects of intellectual humility, controlling for personality and intelligence. Antagonistic and neurotic narcissism were strongly negatively related to independence of intellect and ego, suggesting difficulty separating disagreement from personal threat. Antagonistic narcissism also predicted lower respect for others’ views. In contrast, agentic narcissism showed modest positive links to openness and respect for differing opinions. All three narcissism types were negatively associated with a lack of intellectual overconfidence, highlighting inflated belief in one’s superiority as central to narcissism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656625001023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While narcissism and intellectual humility may seem incompatible, their relationship is more complex due to their multidimensional nature. Across two studies (N1 = 219, Mage = 23.47; SDage = 8.37; N2 = 278, Mage = 21.96; SDage = 4.12; participants recruited through social networking websites), we examined links between three narcissism facets (agentic, antagonistic, neurotic) and four aspects of intellectual humility, controlling for personality and intelligence. Antagonistic and neurotic narcissism were strongly negatively related to independence of intellect and ego, suggesting difficulty separating disagreement from personal threat. Antagonistic narcissism also predicted lower respect for others’ views. In contrast, agentic narcissism showed modest positive links to openness and respect for differing opinions. All three narcissism types were negatively associated with a lack of intellectual overconfidence, highlighting inflated belief in one’s superiority as central to narcissism.
骄傲到不敢怀疑?自恋和智力谦逊之间的关系
虽然自恋和智力谦逊似乎不相容,但由于它们的多维性,它们的关系更加复杂。在两项研究中(N1 = 219, Mage = 23.47; SDage = 8.37; N2 = 278, Mage = 21.96; SDage = 4.12;参与者通过社交网站招募),我们研究了自恋的三个方面(代理型、对抗性、神经质)和智力谦逊的四个方面(控制个性和智力)之间的联系。对抗性和神经性自恋与智力和自我的独立性呈强烈负相关,表明难以将分歧与个人威胁区分开来。对抗性自恋也预示着对他人观点的不尊重。相比之下,代理自恋与开放性和对不同意见的尊重表现出适度的正相关。所有这三种自恋类型都与缺乏智力上的过度自信负相关,突出了对自我优越感的夸大信仰是自恋的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信