How do agrarian transitions affect rural incomes? Insights from a borderland region in northern Vietnam and Laos

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY
Joel Persson , Chanthavone Phomphakdy , Carsten Smith-Hall , Phan Quốc Dũng
{"title":"How do agrarian transitions affect rural incomes? Insights from a borderland region in northern Vietnam and Laos","authors":"Joel Persson ,&nbsp;Chanthavone Phomphakdy ,&nbsp;Carsten Smith-Hall ,&nbsp;Phan Quốc Dũng","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agrarian transitions driven by agricultural commercialisation are often associated with detrimental consequences, including forest loss and environmental degradation. Income effects are less well understood, in part because disentangling the causal processes that affect rural livelihoods is challenging. This paper aims to improve understanding of how agrarian transitions impact rural incomes. First, we develop an analytical framework that elucidates the cross-scale and multidimensional processes by which agrarian transitions manifest in local contexts. Second, the framework is applied to the empirical case of agrarian change and rural livelihoods in a mountainous region bordering northern Lao PDR and Vietnam. We used a comparative mixed-methods approach, combining remote sensing, interviews, focus group discussions, and a household survey (<em>n</em> = 320) to measure rural incomes. We characterised and compared agrarian changes via histories of land-use change, land tenure formalisation, and farming and land-use practices. We disaggregated rural income into average subsistence and cash incomes, focusing on crop farming, livestock rearing, and the collection of environmental products. The findings demonstrate the variegated local income trajectories associated with agrarian transition dynamics in the region. We highlight the enduring importance of subsistence-oriented incomes, even in the Vietnamese sites exhibiting late-transition features. Income from agricultural commercialisation – from hybrid maize, fruit, and livestock – is unevenly distributed. Households in the Lao sites have comparable income levels generated from low-input long-rotation shifting cultivation farming supplemented by environmental income from forests and fallows. Improved characterisation of the site-specific mechanisms shaping rural livelihood change as agrarian transitions unfold can help pinpoint leverage points for improving rural household incomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agrarian transitions driven by agricultural commercialisation are often associated with detrimental consequences, including forest loss and environmental degradation. Income effects are less well understood, in part because disentangling the causal processes that affect rural livelihoods is challenging. This paper aims to improve understanding of how agrarian transitions impact rural incomes. First, we develop an analytical framework that elucidates the cross-scale and multidimensional processes by which agrarian transitions manifest in local contexts. Second, the framework is applied to the empirical case of agrarian change and rural livelihoods in a mountainous region bordering northern Lao PDR and Vietnam. We used a comparative mixed-methods approach, combining remote sensing, interviews, focus group discussions, and a household survey (n = 320) to measure rural incomes. We characterised and compared agrarian changes via histories of land-use change, land tenure formalisation, and farming and land-use practices. We disaggregated rural income into average subsistence and cash incomes, focusing on crop farming, livestock rearing, and the collection of environmental products. The findings demonstrate the variegated local income trajectories associated with agrarian transition dynamics in the region. We highlight the enduring importance of subsistence-oriented incomes, even in the Vietnamese sites exhibiting late-transition features. Income from agricultural commercialisation – from hybrid maize, fruit, and livestock – is unevenly distributed. Households in the Lao sites have comparable income levels generated from low-input long-rotation shifting cultivation farming supplemented by environmental income from forests and fallows. Improved characterisation of the site-specific mechanisms shaping rural livelihood change as agrarian transitions unfold can help pinpoint leverage points for improving rural household incomes.
农业转型如何影响农村收入?来自越南和老挝北部边境地区的见解
农业商业化推动的农业转型往往伴随着有害后果,包括森林损失和环境退化。人们对收入的影响了解较少,部分原因是要理清影响农村生计的因果过程具有挑战性。本文旨在提高对农业转型如何影响农村收入的理解。首先,我们开发了一个分析框架,阐明了农业转型在当地背景下表现出来的跨尺度和多维过程。其次,将该框架应用于与老挝人民民主共和国北部和越南接壤的山区的土地变化和农村生计的实证案例。我们采用比较混合方法,结合遥感、访谈、焦点小组讨论和家庭调查(n = 320)来衡量农村收入。我们通过土地利用变化、土地权属正规化、农业和土地利用实践的历史来描述和比较农业的变化。我们将农村收入分为平均温保收入和现金收入,重点关注种植业、畜牧业和环保产品的收集。研究结果表明,该地区不同的地方收入轨迹与农业转型动态有关。我们强调了以生存为导向的收入的持久重要性,即使在表现出后期转型特征的越南地区也是如此。农业商业化——杂交玉米、水果和牲畜——带来的收入分配不均。老挝地区的家庭收入水平相当,来自低投入、长轮作的轮作耕作,加上森林和休耕带来的环境收入。随着农业转型的展开,更好地描述影响农村生计变化的具体地点机制,有助于确定提高农村家庭收入的杠杆点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信