Nonlinear dynamics of environmental performance in Asia: The role of economic complexity, renewable energy, and green technologies

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Habibeh Salimi, Azar Sheikhzeinoddin
{"title":"Nonlinear dynamics of environmental performance in Asia: The role of economic complexity, renewable energy, and green technologies","authors":"Habibeh Salimi,&nbsp;Azar Sheikhzeinoddin","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing environmental issues stemming from unsustainable practices highlight the necessity to assess and enhance global environmental performance. This research explored the factors influencing environmental performance (EPI) in 25 Asian countries from 2000 to 2022. Firstly, EPI was computed using indicators related to climate change, ecosystem vitality, and environmental health. Then, using a panel ARDL, the factors affecting the EPI were examined in two countries: total selected Asian countries and developing Asian countries. The components included the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), renewable energy consumption (REC), environmental technologies (ET), gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and the Human Development Index (HDI). The findings revealed that Japan achieved the highest score on the EPI, whereas India and Pakistan received the lowest scores. Furthermore, Iran's score raises alarm due to significant challenges, especially in climate change and biodiversity. Additionally, the results rejected the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory for all the Asian countries examined, demonstrating that the Environmental Complexity Index (ECI) is related to sustained enhancements in the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and can support sustainability while decreasing environmental impact. However, a nonlinear relationship was discovered for developing Asian countries, supporting a variation of the EKC theory. While REC and ET are generally associated with positive short-term effects on EPI, particularly in developing countries, they can result in negative or intricate consequences in the long run. This emphasizes the critical need to adapt environmental policies to the varying developmental stages of countries, strengthen governance, and proficiently manage renewable technologies and energy through an integrated life cycle approach. Additionally, it encourages international partnerships to realize sustainable development in Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100938"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing environmental issues stemming from unsustainable practices highlight the necessity to assess and enhance global environmental performance. This research explored the factors influencing environmental performance (EPI) in 25 Asian countries from 2000 to 2022. Firstly, EPI was computed using indicators related to climate change, ecosystem vitality, and environmental health. Then, using a panel ARDL, the factors affecting the EPI were examined in two countries: total selected Asian countries and developing Asian countries. The components included the Economic Complexity Index (ECI), renewable energy consumption (REC), environmental technologies (ET), gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and the Human Development Index (HDI). The findings revealed that Japan achieved the highest score on the EPI, whereas India and Pakistan received the lowest scores. Furthermore, Iran's score raises alarm due to significant challenges, especially in climate change and biodiversity. Additionally, the results rejected the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory for all the Asian countries examined, demonstrating that the Environmental Complexity Index (ECI) is related to sustained enhancements in the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and can support sustainability while decreasing environmental impact. However, a nonlinear relationship was discovered for developing Asian countries, supporting a variation of the EKC theory. While REC and ET are generally associated with positive short-term effects on EPI, particularly in developing countries, they can result in negative or intricate consequences in the long run. This emphasizes the critical need to adapt environmental policies to the varying developmental stages of countries, strengthen governance, and proficiently manage renewable technologies and energy through an integrated life cycle approach. Additionally, it encourages international partnerships to realize sustainable development in Asia.
亚洲环境绩效的非线性动态:经济复杂性、可再生能源和绿色技术的作用
不可持续的做法造成的日益严重的环境问题突出了评估和提高全球环境绩效的必要性。本研究探讨了2000 - 2022年25个亚洲国家环境绩效(EPI)的影响因素。首先,利用气候变化、生态系统活力和环境健康相关指标计算EPI。然后,使用面板ARDL,在两个国家:总选定的亚洲国家和亚洲发展中国家检查了影响扩大投资指数的因素。这些组成部分包括经济复杂性指数(ECI)、可再生能源消费(REC)、环境技术(ET)、人均国内生产总值(GDP)和人类发展指数(HDI)。调查结果显示,日本的EPI得分最高,而印度和巴基斯坦的得分最低。此外,由于面临重大挑战,特别是在气候变化和生物多样性方面,伊朗的得分引起了警惕。此外,所有亚洲国家的研究结果都否定了环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)理论,表明环境复杂性指数(ECI)与环境绩效指数(EPI)的持续增强有关,并且可以在减少环境影响的同时支持可持续性。然而,在亚洲发展中国家发现了一种非线性关系,支持EKC理论的一种变体。虽然REC和ET通常与扩大免疫指数的积极短期影响有关,特别是在发展中国家,但从长期来看,它们可能导致消极或复杂的后果。这强调了迫切需要使环境政策适应各国不同的发展阶段,加强治理,并通过综合生命周期方法熟练管理可再生技术和能源。此外,它鼓励建立国际伙伴关系,以实现亚洲的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信