Modelling environmental fragility in an industrial landscape: An integrated remote sensing-GIS framework for sustainable planning in Brahmani-Dwarka Interfluve

Bhaskar Mandal, Kaushalendra Prakash Goswami, Sharmistha Mondal
{"title":"Modelling environmental fragility in an industrial landscape: An integrated remote sensing-GIS framework for sustainable planning in Brahmani-Dwarka Interfluve","authors":"Bhaskar Mandal,&nbsp;Kaushalendra Prakash Goswami,&nbsp;Sharmistha Mondal","doi":"10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating environmental vulnerability is crucial for efficient and sustainable management, particularly in regions that are ecologically sensitive and experiencing rapid transformations. Thus, the main goal of this study is to evaluate the environmental fragility of the Brahmani-Dwarka Interfluve by integrating key natural and human-induced factors through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) within a remote sensing and geographic information systems (RS-GIS) framework. To achieve this, ten unique factors influencing potential environmental fragility (PEF) were analyzed, along with four new factors to tackle emerging fragility (EEF). This study holds significant value as it focuses on a region profoundly affected by stone crushing industries, which encounter considerable threats of environmental harm. The results of the PEF model showed that high and very high fragility zones accounted for 23.96% and 22.38% of the area, according to the AHP and FAHP models. Similarly, EEF models highlighted a growing fragility, with FAHP and AHP indicating that 27.85% and 16.80% of the region were categorized as having high and very high fragility. Hotspot analysis indicated that environmentally fragile hotspots constituted 21.07% and 31.46% of the area in the AHP and FAHP-based models, respectively. ROC validation indicated that FAHP demonstrated superior performance compared to AHP in both PEF and EEF models, highlighting its exceptional predictive accuracy and reliability. The observed negligible difference between high and low sensitive parameters was 0.866% in FAHP-based PEF and 0.532% in FAHP-based EEF, indicating the models’ reliability. The findings of the study will help policymakers, planners, and stakeholders to develop environmentally resilient strategies and policies as well as achieve sustainability in the study region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100582,"journal":{"name":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystems and Geoenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883825001086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating environmental vulnerability is crucial for efficient and sustainable management, particularly in regions that are ecologically sensitive and experiencing rapid transformations. Thus, the main goal of this study is to evaluate the environmental fragility of the Brahmani-Dwarka Interfluve by integrating key natural and human-induced factors through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) within a remote sensing and geographic information systems (RS-GIS) framework. To achieve this, ten unique factors influencing potential environmental fragility (PEF) were analyzed, along with four new factors to tackle emerging fragility (EEF). This study holds significant value as it focuses on a region profoundly affected by stone crushing industries, which encounter considerable threats of environmental harm. The results of the PEF model showed that high and very high fragility zones accounted for 23.96% and 22.38% of the area, according to the AHP and FAHP models. Similarly, EEF models highlighted a growing fragility, with FAHP and AHP indicating that 27.85% and 16.80% of the region were categorized as having high and very high fragility. Hotspot analysis indicated that environmentally fragile hotspots constituted 21.07% and 31.46% of the area in the AHP and FAHP-based models, respectively. ROC validation indicated that FAHP demonstrated superior performance compared to AHP in both PEF and EEF models, highlighting its exceptional predictive accuracy and reliability. The observed negligible difference between high and low sensitive parameters was 0.866% in FAHP-based PEF and 0.532% in FAHP-based EEF, indicating the models’ reliability. The findings of the study will help policymakers, planners, and stakeholders to develop environmentally resilient strategies and policies as well as achieve sustainability in the study region.

Abstract Image

工业景观中的环境脆弱性建模:Brahmani-Dwarka Interfluve可持续规划的综合遥感- gis框架
评价环境脆弱性对于有效和可持续的管理至关重要,特别是在生态敏感和经历迅速变化的区域。因此,本研究的主要目标是在遥感和地理信息系统(RS-GIS)框架下,通过层次分析法(AHP)和模糊层次分析法(FAHP),综合自然因素和人为因素,评价婆罗门-德瓦卡断裂带的环境脆弱性。为实现这一目标,分析了影响潜在环境脆弱性(PEF)的10个独特因素,以及应对新兴脆弱性(EEF)的4个新因素。这项研究具有重要的价值,因为它关注的是一个深受石料破碎行业影响的地区,这些行业面临着相当大的环境危害威胁。PEF模型的结果显示,AHP和FAHP模型显示,高脆弱区和极高脆弱区分别占总面积的23.96%和22.38%。同样,EEF模型强调了日益增长的脆弱性,FAHP和AHP表明该地区27.85%和16.80%的地区被归类为高脆弱性和非常高脆弱性。热点分析表明,基于AHP和fahp模型的环境脆弱热点区面积分别占21.07%和31.46%。ROC验证表明,与AHP相比,FAHP在PEF和EEF模型中都表现出更好的性能,突出了其卓越的预测准确性和可靠性。基于fahp的PEF和基于fahp的EEF的高低敏感参数差异可忽略不计,分别为0.86%和0.532%,表明模型具有较高的可靠性。研究结果将有助于决策者、规划者和利益相关者制定环境弹性战略和政策,并在研究区域实现可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信