Clearing the airway? A pilot cadaveric study of the LifeVac™ device

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Thomas L. Haupt, Lisa Chionis, Kevin H. Wang
{"title":"Clearing the airway? A pilot cadaveric study of the LifeVac™ device","authors":"Thomas L. Haupt,&nbsp;Lisa Chionis,&nbsp;Kevin H. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Foreign body aspiration (FBA<strong>)</strong> is a leading cause of accidental death, especially among children and older adults. Suction-based airway clearance devices, such as the LifeVac™, an FDA-registered Class II medical device, have garnered attention as potential adjunctive tools in FBA management; however, data on their efficacy remain limited. This study evaluated the performance of the LifeVac™ in a cadaveric model simulating complete upper airway obstruction by commonly aspirated food items.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fresh cadavers with intact upper airway anatomy were used. Grapes, hot dog slices, and steak cubes were placed at the level of the true vocal folds under video-laryngoscopic guidance. Interventions were performed by a PGY-1 otolaryngology resident and a board-certified head and neck surgeon, following LifeVac™ manufacturer instructions. The primary outcome was successful foreign body removal within four minutes. Secondary outcomes included time to removal and evidence of oropharyngeal trauma. All trials were video recorded for technique verification and injury assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 21 trials performed on three cadavers, only one successful extraction occurred (1/21, 4.8 %), involving a hot dog segment removed by a PGY-1 resident. One cadaver was edentulous, which resulted in a poor mask seal and ineffective suction. No grapes or steak were successfully extracted. No visible oropharyngeal trauma was identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this cadaveric model, LifeVac™ demonstrated limited efficacy, with successful removal occurring in only one instance. It is unclear if the lack of efficacy is due to device design or the limitations of the cadaveric model. Further research in physiologic or clinical settings is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266652042500236X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is a leading cause of accidental death, especially among children and older adults. Suction-based airway clearance devices, such as the LifeVac™, an FDA-registered Class II medical device, have garnered attention as potential adjunctive tools in FBA management; however, data on their efficacy remain limited. This study evaluated the performance of the LifeVac™ in a cadaveric model simulating complete upper airway obstruction by commonly aspirated food items.

Methods

Fresh cadavers with intact upper airway anatomy were used. Grapes, hot dog slices, and steak cubes were placed at the level of the true vocal folds under video-laryngoscopic guidance. Interventions were performed by a PGY-1 otolaryngology resident and a board-certified head and neck surgeon, following LifeVac™ manufacturer instructions. The primary outcome was successful foreign body removal within four minutes. Secondary outcomes included time to removal and evidence of oropharyngeal trauma. All trials were video recorded for technique verification and injury assessment.

Results

Across 21 trials performed on three cadavers, only one successful extraction occurred (1/21, 4.8 %), involving a hot dog segment removed by a PGY-1 resident. One cadaver was edentulous, which resulted in a poor mask seal and ineffective suction. No grapes or steak were successfully extracted. No visible oropharyngeal trauma was identified.

Conclusion

In this cadaveric model, LifeVac™ demonstrated limited efficacy, with successful removal occurring in only one instance. It is unclear if the lack of efficacy is due to device design or the limitations of the cadaveric model. Further research in physiologic or clinical settings is warranted.
清理呼吸道?LifeVac™设备的试点尸体研究
背景:异物吸入(FBA)是意外死亡的主要原因,尤其是在儿童和老年人中。基于吸吸的气道清除装置,如LifeVac™(fda注册的II类医疗器械),作为FBA管理的潜在辅助工具引起了人们的关注;然而,关于其疗效的数据仍然有限。本研究评估了LifeVac™在尸体模型中的性能,该模型模拟了由常见吸入食物引起的完全上呼吸道阻塞。方法采用上呼吸道解剖完整的新鲜尸体。在可视喉镜引导下,将葡萄、热狗片和牛排块放置在真正声带的水平面上。干预由PGY-1耳鼻喉科住院医师和委员会认证的头颈外科医生按照LifeVac制造商的说明进行。主要结果是在四分钟内成功取出异物。次要结局包括切除的时间和口咽外伤的证据。所有试验均录像,用于技术验证和损伤评估。结果在三具尸体上进行的21次试验中,只有一次成功提取(1/ 21,4.8%),涉及由PGY-1居民去除的热狗段。一具尸体无牙,导致口罩密封不良,吸吸效果不佳。没有葡萄或牛排被成功提取出来。未发现明显的口咽外伤。在该尸体模型中,LifeVac™显示出有限的疗效,只有一例成功切除。目前尚不清楚缺乏疗效是由于装置设计还是由于尸体模型的限制。进一步的生理或临床研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信