B. González-González , U. Abascal-Ruiz , M. Villa-Alfageme , S. Hurtado-Bermúdez
{"title":"Accuracy of machine learning algorithms for HPGe detector efficiency determination","authors":"B. González-González , U. Abascal-Ruiz , M. Villa-Alfageme , S. Hurtado-Bermúdez","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The accurate determination of full-energy peak efficiency (FEPE) in High-Purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors is critical for gamma-ray spectrometry, especially when source-detector geometries vary. In this study, we investigate the application of six supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms—Polynomial Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, Sparse Gaussian Process, and Multi-Layer Perceptron—for predicting FEPE of a Low Energy HPGe (LEGe) detector across a broad energy range (40–1600 keV) and diverse source types (point and volumetric). Datasets used for training, validation and testing the ML models were generated using Monte Carlo simulations (GESPECOR). Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation and standard error metrics (R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, MRE). Among the tested models, Polynomial Regression and LightGBM demonstrated superior predictive accuracy and interpretability, achieving R<sup>2</sup> values above 0.9999. SHAP values were used for explainability, demonstrating that the models successfully capture the key physical mechanisms influencing FEPE. These results position ML models as reliable and generalizable alternative to conventional FEPE calibration methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 113328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25008205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The accurate determination of full-energy peak efficiency (FEPE) in High-Purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors is critical for gamma-ray spectrometry, especially when source-detector geometries vary. In this study, we investigate the application of six supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms—Polynomial Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, Sparse Gaussian Process, and Multi-Layer Perceptron—for predicting FEPE of a Low Energy HPGe (LEGe) detector across a broad energy range (40–1600 keV) and diverse source types (point and volumetric). Datasets used for training, validation and testing the ML models were generated using Monte Carlo simulations (GESPECOR). Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation and standard error metrics (R2, RMSE, MRE). Among the tested models, Polynomial Regression and LightGBM demonstrated superior predictive accuracy and interpretability, achieving R2 values above 0.9999. SHAP values were used for explainability, demonstrating that the models successfully capture the key physical mechanisms influencing FEPE. These results position ML models as reliable and generalizable alternative to conventional FEPE calibration methods.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.