Application of different machine learning algorithms in post-earthquake failure probability assessment of underground structures

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jiawei Jiang, Tingting Ma, Xingyu Chen, Shuanglan Wu, Guoxing Chen
{"title":"Application of different machine learning algorithms in post-earthquake failure probability assessment of underground structures","authors":"Jiawei Jiang,&nbsp;Tingting Ma,&nbsp;Xingyu Chen,&nbsp;Shuanglan Wu,&nbsp;Guoxing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic vulnerability analysis of underground structures is critical for ensuring the resilience of urban infrastructure against earthquake hazards. However, traditional finite Element method-based cloud models, face challenges due to uncertainties from both aleatory and epistemic aspects, leading to exponentially increasing computational demands. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novel framework integrating the cloud model with machine learning (ML) algorithms to enhance the efficiency of seismic fragility analysis. Specifically, three supervised ML algorithms consisting of Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RF), are employed to predict structural seismic responses, using FEM-derived results as the training dataset. Through rigorous feature selection, data preprocessing, dataset partitioning, and hyperparameter optimization via grid search and cross-validation, robust ML models are developed. Consequently, seismic vulnerability curves are constructed using logarithmic linear regression to correlate ground motion intensity measures (<em>IM</em>s) with structural damage measures (<em>DM</em>s). By comparing these ML-derived curves with finite element analysis results, the Wasserstein distance reveals discrepancies below 0.045, with RF demonstrating the smallest deviations (below 0.025) and superior stability across four full damage states of the subway stations. These findings confirm the reliability and computational efficiency of the proposed ML-based approach, offering a practical alternative for seismic fragility assessment of subway stations and advancing seismic-resistant design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109823"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic vulnerability analysis of underground structures is critical for ensuring the resilience of urban infrastructure against earthquake hazards. However, traditional finite Element method-based cloud models, face challenges due to uncertainties from both aleatory and epistemic aspects, leading to exponentially increasing computational demands. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novel framework integrating the cloud model with machine learning (ML) algorithms to enhance the efficiency of seismic fragility analysis. Specifically, three supervised ML algorithms consisting of Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RF), are employed to predict structural seismic responses, using FEM-derived results as the training dataset. Through rigorous feature selection, data preprocessing, dataset partitioning, and hyperparameter optimization via grid search and cross-validation, robust ML models are developed. Consequently, seismic vulnerability curves are constructed using logarithmic linear regression to correlate ground motion intensity measures (IMs) with structural damage measures (DMs). By comparing these ML-derived curves with finite element analysis results, the Wasserstein distance reveals discrepancies below 0.045, with RF demonstrating the smallest deviations (below 0.025) and superior stability across four full damage states of the subway stations. These findings confirm the reliability and computational efficiency of the proposed ML-based approach, offering a practical alternative for seismic fragility assessment of subway stations and advancing seismic-resistant design.
不同机器学习算法在地下结构震后破坏概率评估中的应用
地下结构的地震易损性分析对于保证城市基础设施抵御地震灾害的能力至关重要。然而,传统的基于有限元方法的云模型面临着来自随机性和认知性方面的不确定性的挑战,导致计算需求呈指数级增长。为了解决这些限制,本研究提出了一个将云模型与机器学习(ML)算法集成在一起的新框架,以提高地震脆弱性分析的效率。具体而言,采用三种监督式机器学习算法,包括反向传播神经网络(BPNN)、支持向量回归(SVR)和随机森林回归(RF),以fem衍生的结果作为训练数据集,预测结构地震反应。通过严格的特征选择、数据预处理、数据集划分以及网格搜索和交叉验证的超参数优化,开发了鲁棒的机器学习模型。因此,利用对数线性回归构建地震易损性曲线,将地震动强度测量(IMs)与结构损伤测量(dm)相关联。将模型曲线与有限元分析结果进行比较,发现Wasserstein距离偏差小于0.045,RF偏差最小(小于0.025),在4种完全损伤状态下具有较好的稳定性。这些研究结果证实了基于ml的方法的可靠性和计算效率,为地铁车站的地震易损性评估和推进抗震设计提供了一种实用的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信