Associations between private and public green space and housing prices in historically redlined neighborhoods: A case study in Miami, Florida

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jae In Oh , Lincoln Larson , Jelena Vukomanovic , Eleni Bardaka , Aaron Hipp
{"title":"Associations between private and public green space and housing prices in historically redlined neighborhoods: A case study in Miami, Florida","authors":"Jae In Oh ,&nbsp;Lincoln Larson ,&nbsp;Jelena Vukomanovic ,&nbsp;Eleni Bardaka ,&nbsp;Aaron Hipp","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gaps in property values between formerly redlined and non-redlined neighborhoods in the U.S. have persisted for decades. Are these gaps narrowing over time, and could green space be a contributing factor? This study investigates whether single-family parcel prices in redlined neighborhoods in Miami, Florida, increased more than those in non-redlined neighborhoods between 2012 and 2022. The study also explores the potential association between these price increases and improved vegetation density in privately owned green space adjacent to homes and public park accessibility. Findings show that escalation in single-family parcel prices was most pronounced in Home Owners’ Loan Corporation D-grade (i.e., redlined) neighborhoods, followed by C, A, and B-grade neighborhoods. The increase in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was more substantial in D-grade neighborhoods than in A-grade neighborhoods. When comparing A and D-grade parcels, the spatial regression results show that an increase in NDVI between 2012 and 2022 was associated with an escalation of property values exclusively in D-grade parcels. This suggests that, within redlined neighborhoods, increased vegetation growth in green space holds significant value. The interaction effect between vegetation growth and park accessibility showed that price appreciation linked to increased vegetation density on private parcels was more pronounced for parcels located farther from parks than for those nearby. These findings underscore the importance of examining the relationship between green space and housing prices not only at the neighborhood level, focusing on park development and accessibility, but also at the individual parcel level, thinking about the greenness of people’s backyards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129081"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725004157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gaps in property values between formerly redlined and non-redlined neighborhoods in the U.S. have persisted for decades. Are these gaps narrowing over time, and could green space be a contributing factor? This study investigates whether single-family parcel prices in redlined neighborhoods in Miami, Florida, increased more than those in non-redlined neighborhoods between 2012 and 2022. The study also explores the potential association between these price increases and improved vegetation density in privately owned green space adjacent to homes and public park accessibility. Findings show that escalation in single-family parcel prices was most pronounced in Home Owners’ Loan Corporation D-grade (i.e., redlined) neighborhoods, followed by C, A, and B-grade neighborhoods. The increase in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was more substantial in D-grade neighborhoods than in A-grade neighborhoods. When comparing A and D-grade parcels, the spatial regression results show that an increase in NDVI between 2012 and 2022 was associated with an escalation of property values exclusively in D-grade parcels. This suggests that, within redlined neighborhoods, increased vegetation growth in green space holds significant value. The interaction effect between vegetation growth and park accessibility showed that price appreciation linked to increased vegetation density on private parcels was more pronounced for parcels located farther from parks than for those nearby. These findings underscore the importance of examining the relationship between green space and housing prices not only at the neighborhood level, focusing on park development and accessibility, but also at the individual parcel level, thinking about the greenness of people’s backyards.
在历史上被划红线的社区中,私人和公共绿地与房价之间的关系:以佛罗里达州迈阿密为例
在美国,以前的红线社区和非红线社区之间的房产价值差距已经持续了几十年。这些差距是否会随着时间的推移而缩小?绿地是否会是一个促成因素?这项研究调查了2012年至2022年间,佛罗里达州迈阿密红线社区的单户住宅价格是否比非红线社区上涨得更多。该研究还探讨了这些价格上涨与住宅附近私人绿地植被密度的改善和公园可达性之间的潜在联系。调查结果显示,单户住宅价格的上涨在房主贷款公司d级(即红线)社区最为明显,其次是C、A和b级社区。归一化植被指数(NDVI)在d级社区的增加幅度大于a级社区。对比A级和d级地块,空间回归结果显示,2012 - 2022年NDVI的增加只与d级地块的房地产价值上升有关。这表明,在红线社区内,绿色空间中增加的植被生长具有重要价值。植被生长与公园可达性之间的交互作用表明,距离公园较远的私人地块的价格上涨与植被密度增加相关,而距离公园较近的地块则更为明显。这些发现强调了研究绿地与房价之间关系的重要性,不仅要在社区层面,关注公园的发展和可达性,而且要在单个地块层面,考虑人们后院的绿色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信