Study on seismic dynamic failure of tunnel-soil-frame structure system through shaking table test and numerical simulation

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xiaogang Wei , Zhifan Qin , Shiao Wang , Shuaixin Ma , Mengqing Shi , Runze Zhang , Junheng Guo , Shasha Lu
{"title":"Study on seismic dynamic failure of tunnel-soil-frame structure system through shaking table test and numerical simulation","authors":"Xiaogang Wei ,&nbsp;Zhifan Qin ,&nbsp;Shiao Wang ,&nbsp;Shuaixin Ma ,&nbsp;Mengqing Shi ,&nbsp;Runze Zhang ,&nbsp;Junheng Guo ,&nbsp;Shasha Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To investigate the dynamic response characteristics of an underground structure–soil–aboveground structure interaction system under seismic loading, a shaking table test based on a metro section in Zhengzhou was conducted. A three-dimensional numerical model including both aboveground and underground structures was developed in ABAQUS. Four typical working conditions and three representative seismic motions were selected. Key response parameters such as acceleration, shear force, bending moment, and inter-story drift angle of the tunnel and frame structures were systematically analyzed. Results reveal strong dynamic coupling between the aboveground and underground structures. The integrated system significantly alters seismic wave propagation and energy distribution, showing a “near-field attenuation and far-field amplification” pattern, with an influence range up to 33.3 times the structural width. The aboveground frame dissipates part of the seismic energy near the site center, reducing peak acceleration by 2.75 % and delaying amplification at around 86 m and 92 m. Meanwhile, the tunnel causes non-uniform far-field amplification. With aboveground structures, tunnel acceleration becomes more spatially uneven, with a 5 % increase in peak response at the center section, indicating stronger localized effects due to wave path disturbance. In terms of internal forces, without the aboveground frame, the tunnel shows pronounced nonlinear responses, with peak shear force and bending moment reaching ±4 × 10<sup>4</sup> N and ±1 × 10<sup>5</sup> N m, revealing potential weak zones. With the frame present, although peak shear increases to ±1.2 × 10<sup>5</sup> N, force distribution becomes smoother and more delayed, reflecting an “energy storage–release” effect that buffers seismic impact. Inter-story drift angles in the aboveground structure are also affected by the tunnel; the maximum drift increases from 0.021 % to 0.030 %, following a “larger at the bottom, smaller at the top” pattern, indicating reduced stiffness in lower stories and an enhanced soft-story effect. Under RSN32 input, resonance with low-order modes causes a significant increase in bottom-story response and more variability across different input motions, highlighting increased sensitivity to seismic frequency. Overall, the dynamic coupling in such systems profoundly affects seismic response in dense urban areas, and seismic design should account for these interactions to enhance structural resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109825"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the dynamic response characteristics of an underground structure–soil–aboveground structure interaction system under seismic loading, a shaking table test based on a metro section in Zhengzhou was conducted. A three-dimensional numerical model including both aboveground and underground structures was developed in ABAQUS. Four typical working conditions and three representative seismic motions were selected. Key response parameters such as acceleration, shear force, bending moment, and inter-story drift angle of the tunnel and frame structures were systematically analyzed. Results reveal strong dynamic coupling between the aboveground and underground structures. The integrated system significantly alters seismic wave propagation and energy distribution, showing a “near-field attenuation and far-field amplification” pattern, with an influence range up to 33.3 times the structural width. The aboveground frame dissipates part of the seismic energy near the site center, reducing peak acceleration by 2.75 % and delaying amplification at around 86 m and 92 m. Meanwhile, the tunnel causes non-uniform far-field amplification. With aboveground structures, tunnel acceleration becomes more spatially uneven, with a 5 % increase in peak response at the center section, indicating stronger localized effects due to wave path disturbance. In terms of internal forces, without the aboveground frame, the tunnel shows pronounced nonlinear responses, with peak shear force and bending moment reaching ±4 × 104 N and ±1 × 105 N m, revealing potential weak zones. With the frame present, although peak shear increases to ±1.2 × 105 N, force distribution becomes smoother and more delayed, reflecting an “energy storage–release” effect that buffers seismic impact. Inter-story drift angles in the aboveground structure are also affected by the tunnel; the maximum drift increases from 0.021 % to 0.030 %, following a “larger at the bottom, smaller at the top” pattern, indicating reduced stiffness in lower stories and an enhanced soft-story effect. Under RSN32 input, resonance with low-order modes causes a significant increase in bottom-story response and more variability across different input motions, highlighting increased sensitivity to seismic frequency. Overall, the dynamic coupling in such systems profoundly affects seismic response in dense urban areas, and seismic design should account for these interactions to enhance structural resilience.
通过振动台试验和数值模拟研究隧道-土-框架结构体系的地震动力破坏
为研究地震荷载作用下地下结构-地基-地上结构相互作用体系的动力响应特性,以郑州市地铁某路段为研究对象,进行了振动台试验。在ABAQUS中建立了包括地上和地下结构的三维数值模型。选取了4种典型工况和3种具有代表性的地震运动。对隧道和框架结构的加速度、剪力、弯矩、层间漂移角等关键响应参数进行了系统分析。结果表明,地上和地下结构之间存在强烈的动力耦合。综合系统显著改变了地震波的传播和能量分布,呈现出“近场衰减、远场放大”的模式,影响范围可达结构宽度的33.3倍。地面框架在场地中心附近消散了部分地震能量,将峰值加速度降低了2.75%,并延迟了86 m和92 m左右的放大。同时,隧道引起远场不均匀放大。在地上结构中,隧道加速度在空间上更加不均匀,在中心截面处峰值响应增加了5%,表明波径扰动对局部效应的影响更强。在内力方面,无地上框架时,隧道表现出明显的非线性响应,剪力和弯矩峰值分别达到±4 × 104 N和±1 × 105 N m,存在潜在的薄弱区。框架存在后,虽然峰值剪切增大到±1.2 × 105 N,但力分布变得更加平滑和延迟,反映了缓冲地震冲击的“能量储存释放”效应。地上结构层间漂移角也受隧道影响;最大位移从0.021%增加到0.030%,遵循“底部大,顶部小”的模式,表明低层刚度降低,软层效应增强。在RSN32输入下,低阶模态共振导致底层响应显著增加,不同输入运动之间的变异性更大,突出了对地震频率的敏感性增加。总体而言,这些系统中的动力耦合深刻地影响着密集城市地区的地震反应,抗震设计应考虑这些相互作用,以增强结构的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信