Simulated uncertainty in gamified language learning: Investigating resilience, academic buoyancy, and on-task focus through the lens of expectancy-value theory and operant conditioning

IF 4.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102196
Ehsan Namaziandost , Ferdi Çelik
{"title":"Simulated uncertainty in gamified language learning: Investigating resilience, academic buoyancy, and on-task focus through the lens of expectancy-value theory and operant conditioning","authors":"Ehsan Namaziandost ,&nbsp;Ferdi Çelik","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gamification has gained prominence in language education for its ability to enhance learner motivation and engagement, yet the role of simulated uncertainty within these environments remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how unpredictable elements in gamified language learning influence Turkish EFL learners’ resilience, academic buoyancy, and on-task focus, drawing on Expectancy-Value Theory and Operant Conditioning. A mixed-method approach was employed, involving 69 EFL students aged 16–18, randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 36) receiving gamified instruction with simulated uncertainty or a control group (n = 33) receiving traditional non-gamified instruction without uncertainty. Quantitative data were collected using the Academic Resilience Scale, the Academic Buoyancy Scale, and an On-Task Focus Observation Checklist, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 16 experimental group participants. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANCOVA, showed that the experimental group exhibited significantly greater improvements in resilience, buoyancy, and task-focused behavior compared to the control group, after controlling for pretest scores. Interview findings revealed that uncertain tasks fostered increased motivation, emotional regulation, and adaptive strategies, with participants noting that variable rewards and unpredictable challenges sustained their engagement and encouraged reflective learning. These results evidence that embedding simulated uncertainty in gamified instruction can enhance psychological and behavioral outcomes critical for language learning success. This study offers insights for designing motivationally supportive EFL instruction in technology-enhanced contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025001031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gamification has gained prominence in language education for its ability to enhance learner motivation and engagement, yet the role of simulated uncertainty within these environments remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining how unpredictable elements in gamified language learning influence Turkish EFL learners’ resilience, academic buoyancy, and on-task focus, drawing on Expectancy-Value Theory and Operant Conditioning. A mixed-method approach was employed, involving 69 EFL students aged 16–18, randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 36) receiving gamified instruction with simulated uncertainty or a control group (n = 33) receiving traditional non-gamified instruction without uncertainty. Quantitative data were collected using the Academic Resilience Scale, the Academic Buoyancy Scale, and an On-Task Focus Observation Checklist, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 16 experimental group participants. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and ANCOVA, showed that the experimental group exhibited significantly greater improvements in resilience, buoyancy, and task-focused behavior compared to the control group, after controlling for pretest scores. Interview findings revealed that uncertain tasks fostered increased motivation, emotional regulation, and adaptive strategies, with participants noting that variable rewards and unpredictable challenges sustained their engagement and encouraged reflective learning. These results evidence that embedding simulated uncertainty in gamified instruction can enhance psychological and behavioral outcomes critical for language learning success. This study offers insights for designing motivationally supportive EFL instruction in technology-enhanced contexts.
游戏化语言学习中的模拟不确定性:通过期望值理论和操作性条件反射的视角调查弹性、学术浮力和任务焦点
游戏化因其增强学习者动机和参与的能力而在语言教育中获得突出地位,但模拟不确定性在这些环境中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。本研究利用期望价值理论和操作性条件反射,研究了游戏化语言学习中不可预测的因素如何影响土耳其英语学习者的弹性、学业活力和任务专注力,从而解决了这一差距。采用混合方法,涉及69名16-18岁的EFL学生,随机分配到实验组(n = 36)接受模拟不确定性的游戏化教学,对照组(n = 33)接受没有不确定性的传统非游戏化教学。定量数据采用学业弹性量表、学业浮力量表和任务焦点观察表收集,定性数据采用半结构化访谈法收集16名实验组参与者。包括t检验和ANCOVA在内的统计分析表明,在控制了前测分数后,实验组在弹性、浮力和任务集中行为方面表现出比对照组显著更大的改善。访谈结果显示,不确定的任务促进了动机、情绪调节和适应性策略的增加,参与者注意到可变的奖励和不可预测的挑战维持了他们的参与,并鼓励了反思学习。这些结果证明,在游戏化教学中嵌入模拟的不确定性可以提高对语言学习成功至关重要的心理和行为结果。本研究为在技术增强的背景下设计动机支持的英语教学提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书