Quantifying and managing uncertainty in systems biology: Mechanistic and data-driven models

IF 2.2 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Eva Balsa-Canto , Nùria Campo-Manzanares , Artai R. Moimenta , Geoffrey Roudaut , Diego Troitiño-Jordedo
{"title":"Quantifying and managing uncertainty in systems biology: Mechanistic and data-driven models","authors":"Eva Balsa-Canto ,&nbsp;Nùria Campo-Manzanares ,&nbsp;Artai R. Moimenta ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Roudaut ,&nbsp;Diego Troitiño-Jordedo","doi":"10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncertainty poses a significant challenge to the reliability and interpretability of systems biology models. This review focuses on reducible epistemic uncertainty arising from incomplete data, measurement errors, or limited biological knowledge. We examine how this uncertainty affects both mechanistic models —such as dynamic kinetic and genome-scale metabolic models— and data-driven models, including neural networks trained on time-series data. Strategies for quantifying and mitigating uncertainty are reviewed, including profile likelihoods, Bayesian inference, ensemble modelling, optimal experimental design and active learning. Through illustrative case studies, we show how data limitations, model structure, and experimental design influence uncertainty propagation and model predictions. Finally, in our outlook, we highlight key research avenues to build more robust models, including hybrid frameworks combining mechanistic models with machine learning to improve interpretability and predictive performance, advances in inference methods and tools, or the definition of benchmarks to support reproducibility and method comparison.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37400,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310025000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty poses a significant challenge to the reliability and interpretability of systems biology models. This review focuses on reducible epistemic uncertainty arising from incomplete data, measurement errors, or limited biological knowledge. We examine how this uncertainty affects both mechanistic models —such as dynamic kinetic and genome-scale metabolic models— and data-driven models, including neural networks trained on time-series data. Strategies for quantifying and mitigating uncertainty are reviewed, including profile likelihoods, Bayesian inference, ensemble modelling, optimal experimental design and active learning. Through illustrative case studies, we show how data limitations, model structure, and experimental design influence uncertainty propagation and model predictions. Finally, in our outlook, we highlight key research avenues to build more robust models, including hybrid frameworks combining mechanistic models with machine learning to improve interpretability and predictive performance, advances in inference methods and tools, or the definition of benchmarks to support reproducibility and method comparison.
量化和管理系统生物学中的不确定性:机械和数据驱动模型
不确定性对系统生物学模型的可靠性和可解释性提出了重大挑战。这篇综述的重点是由不完整的数据、测量误差或有限的生物学知识引起的可简化的认知不确定性。我们研究了这种不确定性如何影响机制模型(如动态动力学和基因组尺度代谢模型)和数据驱动模型(包括在时间序列数据上训练的神经网络)。本文回顾了量化和减轻不确定性的策略,包括轮廓似然、贝叶斯推理、集成建模、最优实验设计和主动学习。通过说明性案例研究,我们展示了数据限制、模型结构和实验设计如何影响不确定性传播和模型预测。最后,在我们的展望中,我们强调了构建更健壮模型的关键研究途径,包括将机制模型与机器学习相结合的混合框架,以提高可解释性和预测性能,推理方法和工具的进步,或者定义基准以支持可重复性和方法比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Systems Biology
Current Opinion in Systems Biology Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Systems Biology is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up-to-date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Systems Biology. It publishes polished, concise and timely systematic reviews and opinion articles. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion on the topics discussed. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year. The following areas will be covered by Current Opinion in Systems Biology: -Genomics and Epigenomics -Gene Regulation -Metabolic Networks -Cancer and Systemic Diseases -Mathematical Modelling -Big Data Acquisition and Analysis -Systems Pharmacology and Physiology -Synthetic Biology -Stem Cells, Development, and Differentiation -Systems Biology of Mold Organisms -Systems Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interaction -Systems Ecology and Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信