Group dynamics in the delivery of the Reflective Fostering Programme: managing ‘face-threat’ risks in a mentalization-based intervention for foster carers

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Po Ruby , Carys Seeley , Thando Katangwe-Chigamba , Adaku Anyiam-Osigwe , Caroline Cresswell , Karen Irvine , Nick Midgley , Jamie Murdoch
{"title":"Group dynamics in the delivery of the Reflective Fostering Programme: managing ‘face-threat’ risks in a mentalization-based intervention for foster carers","authors":"Po Ruby ,&nbsp;Carys Seeley ,&nbsp;Thando Katangwe-Chigamba ,&nbsp;Adaku Anyiam-Osigwe ,&nbsp;Caroline Cresswell ,&nbsp;Karen Irvine ,&nbsp;Nick Midgley ,&nbsp;Jamie Murdoch","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interventions aimed at enhancing the reflective capacity of parents and carers (their ability to think about their own and their child's mental states, and how these underpin behaviour) aim to improve the quality of the carer-child relationship and child wellbeing. Evaluating how implementation of such interventions for foster carers interacts with the wider context of social care is vital for understanding how intervention mechanisms function. The Reflective Fostering Programme (RFP) is a mentalization-based, psycho-educational intervention delivered across 10 sessions to groups of 5–10 foster carers. Video-recordings of sessions were collected between April 2020 and December 2023 in three sites taking part in a randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Group size in our sample ranged from 5 to 8 people (18 in total). Most participants were foster carers (n = 16), with the remaining (n = 2) kinship or connected carers. In close alignment with the demographic characteristics of carers in the UK, the majority (n = 15) were female, and White British (n = 17). Drawing on Goffman's concept of ‘face threat’, we used conversation analysis to examine the enactment of reflective fostering mechanisms within sessions to explore how the wider children's social care system shaped implementation and mechanisms of change. The development of supportive and trusting group dynamics was critical for facilitating engagement and participation with RFP. However, a supportive dynamic was contingent on carers navigating ‘interactional dilemmas’ to manage face-threatening risks to their personal and professional reputations. Active engagement with RFP relied on successful mitigation of these face-threats. In doing so, an interactional space was afforded for carers to practise and develop their reflective capacity. These findings highlight how implementation of RFP and other group-based foster care interventions need to carefully consider pre-existing relationships, the distribution of power, and strategies for creating a space for carers to overcome potential face-threatening risks and share difficult experiences. Social care services can facilitate implementation by creating a supportive environment which acknowledges and validates carer stress and vulnerability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325001355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions aimed at enhancing the reflective capacity of parents and carers (their ability to think about their own and their child's mental states, and how these underpin behaviour) aim to improve the quality of the carer-child relationship and child wellbeing. Evaluating how implementation of such interventions for foster carers interacts with the wider context of social care is vital for understanding how intervention mechanisms function. The Reflective Fostering Programme (RFP) is a mentalization-based, psycho-educational intervention delivered across 10 sessions to groups of 5–10 foster carers. Video-recordings of sessions were collected between April 2020 and December 2023 in three sites taking part in a randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Group size in our sample ranged from 5 to 8 people (18 in total). Most participants were foster carers (n = 16), with the remaining (n = 2) kinship or connected carers. In close alignment with the demographic characteristics of carers in the UK, the majority (n = 15) were female, and White British (n = 17). Drawing on Goffman's concept of ‘face threat’, we used conversation analysis to examine the enactment of reflective fostering mechanisms within sessions to explore how the wider children's social care system shaped implementation and mechanisms of change. The development of supportive and trusting group dynamics was critical for facilitating engagement and participation with RFP. However, a supportive dynamic was contingent on carers navigating ‘interactional dilemmas’ to manage face-threatening risks to their personal and professional reputations. Active engagement with RFP relied on successful mitigation of these face-threats. In doing so, an interactional space was afforded for carers to practise and develop their reflective capacity. These findings highlight how implementation of RFP and other group-based foster care interventions need to carefully consider pre-existing relationships, the distribution of power, and strategies for creating a space for carers to overcome potential face-threatening risks and share difficult experiences. Social care services can facilitate implementation by creating a supportive environment which acknowledges and validates carer stress and vulnerability.
团体动态在提供反思性寄养计划:管理“面对威胁”的风险,以心理为基础的干预寄养照顾者
旨在提高父母和照顾者的反思能力的干预措施(他们思考自己和孩子的精神状态的能力,以及这些状态如何支撑行为的能力)旨在改善照顾者与孩子关系的质量和儿童的福祉。评估此类干预措施的实施如何与更广泛的社会护理背景相互作用,对于理解干预机制如何发挥作用至关重要。反思性寄养计划(RFP)是一项以心理为基础的心理教育干预措施,分10次向5-10名寄养照顾者提供服务。在2020年4月至2023年12月期间,在英国参加随机对照试验的三个地点收集了会议的视频记录。我们样本中的群体规模从5到8人不等(总共18人)。大多数参与者是寄养照顾者(n = 16),其余(n = 2)是亲属关系或有联系的照顾者。与英国护理人员的人口特征密切相关,大多数(n = 15)是女性,以及英国白人(n = 17)。根据戈夫曼的“面对威胁”概念,我们使用对话分析来检查会议中反思性培养机制的制定,以探索更广泛的儿童社会关怀系统如何影响实施和变革机制。发展支持和信任的群体动力对于促进参与和参与RFP至关重要。然而,支持的动力取决于护理人员如何应对“互动困境”,以管理危及个人和职业声誉的风险。积极参与RFP依赖于成功缓解这些威胁。在这样做的过程中,为护理人员提供了一个互动空间来练习和发展他们的反思能力。这些发现强调了RFP和其他基于群体的寄养干预措施的实施需要仔细考虑预先存在的关系、权力分配以及为照顾者创造空间以克服潜在的威胁风险和分享困难经历的策略。社会关怀服务可以通过创造一个支持性的环境,承认和确认照顾者的压力和脆弱性,从而促进实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信