Effectiveness of a patient-centered informational video for reducing anxiety before coronary catheterization: A self-controlled trial

Asaf Arel , Gil Marcus , Ella Levi , Olexiy Bonder , Antoinette Monayer , Saar Minha
{"title":"Effectiveness of a patient-centered informational video for reducing anxiety before coronary catheterization: A self-controlled trial","authors":"Asaf Arel ,&nbsp;Gil Marcus ,&nbsp;Ella Levi ,&nbsp;Olexiy Bonder ,&nbsp;Antoinette Monayer ,&nbsp;Saar Minha","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate whether viewing a locally produced, patient-centered informational video is associated with lower peri-procedural anxiety among patients undergoing coronary catheterization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective, single-center, single-arm, self-controlled study. Consecutive weekday-morning patients were enrolled on recruitment days (<em>N</em> = 259). Anxiety was assessed with the Numeric Visual Analog Anxiety Scale (NVAAS, 0–10) at three time points: post-consent/pre-video (T0), immediately post-video/pre-procedure (T1), and post-procedure (T2). The primary analysis used a Friedman test on complete cases (<em>n</em> = 176) with Kendall's W; pairwise contrasts used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm adjustment, reporting Hodges–Lehmann median paired differences with 95 % CIs. Available-case and subgroup sensitivity analyses were prespecified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median baseline anxiety was 5.0 (IQR 3.0–7.9). Anxiety decreased across time (Friedman χ<sup>2</sup>(2, <em>n</em> = 176) = 167.28, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001; Kendall's W = 0.48). Pairwise HL median differences were: T1-T0–1.5 (95 % CI -2.0 to −1.0; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), T2-T0–3.5 (−4.0 to −3.0; p &lt; 0.001), and T2-T1–1.5 (−2.0 to −1.0; p &lt; 0.001). Available-case sensitivity analyses yielded consistent effects. Baseline anxiety was higher in females; it also tended to be higher in first-time catheterization patients (<em>p</em> = 0.099).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Viewing a patient-centered video was associated with lower anxiety before coronary catheterization; causality cannot be inferred from this single-arm design.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>The intervention was produced by the clinical team, filmed in the actual unit, and is publicly available in three languages, offering a scalable, low-cost approach that can be locally adapted. Randomized, multicenter trials are warranted to confirm efficacy and generalizability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate whether viewing a locally produced, patient-centered informational video is associated with lower peri-procedural anxiety among patients undergoing coronary catheterization.

Methods

Prospective, single-center, single-arm, self-controlled study. Consecutive weekday-morning patients were enrolled on recruitment days (N = 259). Anxiety was assessed with the Numeric Visual Analog Anxiety Scale (NVAAS, 0–10) at three time points: post-consent/pre-video (T0), immediately post-video/pre-procedure (T1), and post-procedure (T2). The primary analysis used a Friedman test on complete cases (n = 176) with Kendall's W; pairwise contrasts used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm adjustment, reporting Hodges–Lehmann median paired differences with 95 % CIs. Available-case and subgroup sensitivity analyses were prespecified.

Results

Median baseline anxiety was 5.0 (IQR 3.0–7.9). Anxiety decreased across time (Friedman χ2(2, n = 176) = 167.28, p < 0.0001; Kendall's W = 0.48). Pairwise HL median differences were: T1-T0–1.5 (95 % CI -2.0 to −1.0; p < 0.001), T2-T0–3.5 (−4.0 to −3.0; p < 0.001), and T2-T1–1.5 (−2.0 to −1.0; p < 0.001). Available-case sensitivity analyses yielded consistent effects. Baseline anxiety was higher in females; it also tended to be higher in first-time catheterization patients (p = 0.099).

Conclusion

Viewing a patient-centered video was associated with lower anxiety before coronary catheterization; causality cannot be inferred from this single-arm design.

Innovation

The intervention was produced by the clinical team, filmed in the actual unit, and is publicly available in three languages, offering a scalable, low-cost approach that can be locally adapted. Randomized, multicenter trials are warranted to confirm efficacy and generalizability.
以患者为中心的信息视频在冠状动脉导管插入术前减少焦虑的有效性:一项自我对照试验
目的评价在接受冠状动脉导管置入的患者中,观看当地制作的、以患者为中心的信息视频是否与较低的术中焦虑有关。方法前瞻性、单中心、单臂、自我对照研究。在招募日,连续的工作日早晨患者入组(N = 259)。使用数字视觉模拟焦虑量表(NVAAS, 0-10)在三个时间点评估焦虑:同意后/视频前(T0)、视频后/手术前(T1)和手术后(T2)。初步分析使用了完整病例(n = 176)的Friedman检验和Kendall的W;两两对比采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Holm调整,报告Hodges-Lehmann中位数配对差异为95% ci。可用病例和亚组敏感性分析是预先指定的。结果基线焦虑中位数为5.0 (IQR 3.0-7.9)。焦虑随时间减少(Friedman χ2(2, n = 176) = 167.28, p < 0.0001;Kendall’s W = 0.48)。成对霍奇金淋巴瘤差异中位数:t1 - t0 - 1.5 (95% CI -2.0−1.0;p & lt; 0.001), t2 - t0 - 3.5(4.0−−3.0;p & lt; 0.001), t1和t2 - - 1.5(2.0−−1.0;p & lt; 0.001)。可用案例敏感性分析得出了一致的结果。女性的基线焦虑更高;首次置管的患者也倾向于更高(p = 0.099)。结论冠脉置管前观看以患者为中心的视频可降低患者的焦虑程度;不能从这种单臂设计推断出因果关系。该干预措施由临床团队制作,在实际单位拍摄,并以三种语言公开发布,提供了一种可扩展、低成本的方法,可以在当地进行调整。需要随机、多中心试验来证实疗效和可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信