Omri-David Soffer , Lori R. Newman , Mary Brennan , David N. Williams , Christy L. Cummings
{"title":"The Pediatric Ethics & Professionalism Assessment Tool (Pedi-EPAT): Development and implementation of a novel, competency-based assessment","authors":"Omri-David Soffer , Lori R. Newman , Mary Brennan , David N. Williams , Christy L. Cummings","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and demonstrate validation of a competency-based formative assessment tool, the Pediatric Ethics & Professionalism Assessment Tool (Pedi-EPAT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a multi-phased study design, a panel of national experts in pediatrics, ethics, and medical education participated in tool development and established content validity using a Delphi approach. To optimize rating accuracy and minimize inter-rater variation, the panel completed frame-of-reference training, consisting of inter-rater comparisons of 3 recorded, simulated scenarios involving parent-actors and pediatric trainees. Outcomes included degree-of-association of raters' ordinal assessments, agreement of ratings between experts and raters, and median ratings per simulated scenario. Kendall's coefficient was used to estimate consistency across raters, and a structural equation-modeling framework assessed internal reliability</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>11 experts participated in the 2-round Delphi. The final Pedi-EPAT achieved consensus and contained 34 items, including 2 items independent of the Delphi. During FOR training, consistency among the 6 raters by Kendall's coefficient was low-moderate (w = 0.33–0.35, <em>p</em> < 0.05). The tool demonstrated excellent internal reliability (composite reliability = 0.97)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This novel, competency-based, formative assessment tool demonstrated content validity and internal reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>The Pedi-EPAT could aid supervising staff in providing high-quality assessments and feedback on ethical behavior and professionalism for pediatric trainees engaging in conversations with families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To develop and demonstrate validation of a competency-based formative assessment tool, the Pediatric Ethics & Professionalism Assessment Tool (Pedi-EPAT).
Methods
Using a multi-phased study design, a panel of national experts in pediatrics, ethics, and medical education participated in tool development and established content validity using a Delphi approach. To optimize rating accuracy and minimize inter-rater variation, the panel completed frame-of-reference training, consisting of inter-rater comparisons of 3 recorded, simulated scenarios involving parent-actors and pediatric trainees. Outcomes included degree-of-association of raters' ordinal assessments, agreement of ratings between experts and raters, and median ratings per simulated scenario. Kendall's coefficient was used to estimate consistency across raters, and a structural equation-modeling framework assessed internal reliability
Results
11 experts participated in the 2-round Delphi. The final Pedi-EPAT achieved consensus and contained 34 items, including 2 items independent of the Delphi. During FOR training, consistency among the 6 raters by Kendall's coefficient was low-moderate (w = 0.33–0.35, p < 0.05). The tool demonstrated excellent internal reliability (composite reliability = 0.97)
Conclusion
This novel, competency-based, formative assessment tool demonstrated content validity and internal reliability.
Practice implications
The Pedi-EPAT could aid supervising staff in providing high-quality assessments and feedback on ethical behavior and professionalism for pediatric trainees engaging in conversations with families.