High performance of low/ultralow-dose photon-counting CT for pulmonary metastasis in young musculoskeletal malignancy patients

IF 2.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shanshui Zhou , Qiyuan Bao , Haipeng Dong , Jiqiang Li , Zhihan Xu , Lianjun Du , Wenjie Yang , Yong Lu , Weibin Zhang , Fuhua Yan , Le Qin
{"title":"High performance of low/ultralow-dose photon-counting CT for pulmonary metastasis in young musculoskeletal malignancy patients","authors":"Shanshui Zhou ,&nbsp;Qiyuan Bao ,&nbsp;Haipeng Dong ,&nbsp;Jiqiang Li ,&nbsp;Zhihan Xu ,&nbsp;Lianjun Du ,&nbsp;Wenjie Yang ,&nbsp;Yong Lu ,&nbsp;Weibin Zhang ,&nbsp;Fuhua Yan ,&nbsp;Le Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the performance of chest photon-counting CT (PCCT) at low-dose (LD) and ultralow-dose (ULD) in young musculoskeletal malignancy patients with pulmonary metastasis and compare with prior standard-dose energy-integrating CT (EICT).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>From August to November 2023, this prospective study recruited consecutive participants with prior EICT images and grouped them into LD and ULD groups to receive PCCT examination. Two observers independently and blindly evaluated the image quality using a five-point Likert scale. Intraindividual differences between PCCT and EICT were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired samples <em>t</em>-test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The LD and ULD groups included 50 (19 [16; 21] years; 33 males) and 50 participants (19 [14; 21] years; 30 males), respectively. The interval between EICT and PCCT examinations was 116 (88.5; 194) days. Compared with EICT, PCCT obtained median effective dose reduction rates of 87.62 % (3.78 [3.15; 5.18] vs. 0.43 [0.39; 0.58] mSv; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and 92.58 % (3.92 [2.96; 4.95] vs. 0.27 [0.22; 0.34] mSv; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) in the LD and ULD groups, respectively. For subjective assessments, PCCT has superior overall image quality (5 [5; 5] vs. 5 [4; 5]) and lung nodule visualization (5 [5; 5] vs. 5 [4; 5]) to EICT (all <em>p</em>-values &lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PCCT provided higher image quality and lung nodule visualization with significant dose reduction compared to EICT in these young musculoskeletal malignancy patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the performance of chest photon-counting CT (PCCT) at low-dose (LD) and ultralow-dose (ULD) in young musculoskeletal malignancy patients with pulmonary metastasis and compare with prior standard-dose energy-integrating CT (EICT).

Materials and methods

From August to November 2023, this prospective study recruited consecutive participants with prior EICT images and grouped them into LD and ULD groups to receive PCCT examination. Two observers independently and blindly evaluated the image quality using a five-point Likert scale. Intraindividual differences between PCCT and EICT were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired samples t-test.

Results

The LD and ULD groups included 50 (19 [16; 21] years; 33 males) and 50 participants (19 [14; 21] years; 30 males), respectively. The interval between EICT and PCCT examinations was 116 (88.5; 194) days. Compared with EICT, PCCT obtained median effective dose reduction rates of 87.62 % (3.78 [3.15; 5.18] vs. 0.43 [0.39; 0.58] mSv; p < 0.001) and 92.58 % (3.92 [2.96; 4.95] vs. 0.27 [0.22; 0.34] mSv; p < 0.001) in the LD and ULD groups, respectively. For subjective assessments, PCCT has superior overall image quality (5 [5; 5] vs. 5 [4; 5]) and lung nodule visualization (5 [5; 5] vs. 5 [4; 5]) to EICT (all p-values <0.001).

Conclusion

PCCT provided higher image quality and lung nodule visualization with significant dose reduction compared to EICT in these young musculoskeletal malignancy patients.
低/超低剂量光子计数CT对年轻肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤肺转移的高效诊断
目的探讨低剂量(LD)和超低剂量(ULD)胸部光子计数CT (PCCT)在年轻肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤合并肺转移患者中的表现,并与既往标准剂量能量积分CT (EICT)进行比较。材料与方法本前瞻性研究于2023年8月至11月连续招募有EICT影像的受试者,将其分为LD组和ULD组接受PCCT检查。两名观察员独立和盲目评估图像质量使用五点李克特量表。PCCT和EICT的个体差异采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验或配对样本t检验进行比较。结果LD组50例(19[16;21]岁,男性33例),ULD组50例(19[14;21]岁,男性30例)。EICT与PCCT检查间隔116(88.5;194)天。与EICT相比,PCCT在LD组和ULD组的中位有效剂量减少率分别为87.62 %(3.78[3.15;5.18]比0.43 [0.39;0.58]mSv; p <; 0.001)和92.58 %(3.92[2.96;4.95]比0.27 [0.22;0.34]mSv; p <; 0.001)。在主观评价方面,PCCT具有优于EICT的整体图像质量(5 [5;5]vs. 5[4; 5])和肺结节显示(5 [5;5]vs. 5[4; 5])(所有p值<;0.001)。结论与EICT相比,pcct在年轻肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤患者中具有更高的图像质量和更清晰的肺结节显示,且剂量明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信