Association of waiting time from diagnosis to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on interval distant metastases in esophageal cancer patients: A study based on the Netherlands cancer registry

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110456
Jingpu Wang , Zhouqiao Wu , Lucas Goense , Rob H.A. Verhoeven , Jelle P. Ruurda , Richard van Hillegersberg
{"title":"Association of waiting time from diagnosis to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on interval distant metastases in esophageal cancer patients: A study based on the Netherlands cancer registry","authors":"Jingpu Wang ,&nbsp;Zhouqiao Wu ,&nbsp;Lucas Goense ,&nbsp;Rob H.A. Verhoeven ,&nbsp;Jelle P. Ruurda ,&nbsp;Richard van Hillegersberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In patients with resectable esophageal cancer, interval distant metastases may be detected following neoadjuvant-intent chemoradiotherapy ((n)CRT). The specific association between the waiting time from diagnosis to the initiation of (n)CRT and interval metastases remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with esophageal cancer (cT1-4a N0-3 M0) received CRT with or without surgery were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Multivariable logistic and cox regression analyses were used to compare different waiting times (≤4, 4–8 and &gt;8weeks) on the risk of interval metastases, post-(n)CRT short-term metastases (detected preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively within 120 days after CROSS regimen CRT) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis based on cN stage was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 4394 patients were included. Compared to the waiting ≤4 weeks, the waiting &gt;8 weeks was associated with higher risk of interval metastases (p-value = 0.045),but the longer waiting times were not associated with higher risk of post-(n)CRT short-term metastases or worse OS. In the cN0 subgroup, compared to the waiting ≤4 weeks, the waiting 4–8weeks (p-value = 0.049; p-value = 0.046) and &gt;8 weeks (p-value = 0.006; p-value = 0.006) was associated with higher risk of interval metastases and post-(n)CRT short-term metastases, but was not associated with worse OS. In the cN + subgroup, the longer waiting times were not associated with interval metastases or post-(n)CRT short-term metastases or OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A longer waiting time from diagnosis to the initiation of (n)CRT was associated with a higher risk of interval metastases, but not with an increased risk of post-(n)CRT short-term metastases or worse OS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 12","pages":"Article 110456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325008844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In patients with resectable esophageal cancer, interval distant metastases may be detected following neoadjuvant-intent chemoradiotherapy ((n)CRT). The specific association between the waiting time from diagnosis to the initiation of (n)CRT and interval metastases remains unclear.

Methods

Patients with esophageal cancer (cT1-4a N0-3 M0) received CRT with or without surgery were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Multivariable logistic and cox regression analyses were used to compare different waiting times (≤4, 4–8 and >8weeks) on the risk of interval metastases, post-(n)CRT short-term metastases (detected preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively within 120 days after CROSS regimen CRT) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis based on cN stage was performed.

Results

Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 4394 patients were included. Compared to the waiting ≤4 weeks, the waiting >8 weeks was associated with higher risk of interval metastases (p-value = 0.045),but the longer waiting times were not associated with higher risk of post-(n)CRT short-term metastases or worse OS. In the cN0 subgroup, compared to the waiting ≤4 weeks, the waiting 4–8weeks (p-value = 0.049; p-value = 0.046) and >8 weeks (p-value = 0.006; p-value = 0.006) was associated with higher risk of interval metastases and post-(n)CRT short-term metastases, but was not associated with worse OS. In the cN + subgroup, the longer waiting times were not associated with interval metastases or post-(n)CRT short-term metastases or OS.

Conclusion

A longer waiting time from diagnosis to the initiation of (n)CRT was associated with a higher risk of interval metastases, but not with an increased risk of post-(n)CRT short-term metastases or worse OS.
食管癌间隔期远处转移患者从诊断到新辅助放化疗等待时间的相关性:一项基于荷兰癌症登记处的研究
在可切除的食管癌患者中,间隔期远端转移可以在新辅助意图放化疗((n)CRT)后检测到。从诊断到开始(n)CRT的等待时间与间期转移之间的具体关联尚不清楚。方法从荷兰癌症登记处提取接受CRT (cT1-4a N0-3 M0)伴或不伴手术的食管癌患者。采用多变量logistic和cox回归分析比较不同等待时间(≤4、4 - 8和>;8周)对间期转移、CRT后短期转移(CROSS方案CRT后120天内术前、术中或术后检测)风险和总生存期(OS)的影响。根据cN分期进行亚组分析。结果2015 - 2021年共纳入患者4394例。与等待≤4周相比,等待>;8周间期转移的风险较高(p值= 0.045),但较长的等待时间与(n)CRT后短期转移的风险较高或较差的OS无关。在cN0亚组中,与等待≤4周相比,等待4 - 8周(p值= 0.049;p值= 0.046)和等待>;8周(p值= 0.006;p值= 0.006)与间隔转移和(n)CRT后短期转移的风险较高相关,但与更差的OS无关。在cN +亚组中,较长的等待时间与间隔转移或(n)CRT后短期转移或OS无关。结论从诊断到开始(n)CRT的等待时间越长,间隔期转移的风险越高,但与(n)CRT后短期转移的风险增加或更差的OS无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信