Effects of different forestry management practices on soil mesofauna in the regeneration phase

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Norbert Flórián , Veronika Gergócs-Winkler , Bence Kovács , Réka Aszalós , András Bidló , Péter Ódor
{"title":"Effects of different forestry management practices on soil mesofauna in the regeneration phase","authors":"Norbert Flórián ,&nbsp;Veronika Gergócs-Winkler ,&nbsp;Bence Kovács ,&nbsp;Réka Aszalós ,&nbsp;András Bidló ,&nbsp;Péter Ódor","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests hold both ecological and economic value, but as the majority are now under human management, there is an increasing need for silvicultural strategies that support biodiversity and ecosystem functioning alongside timber production. Soil mesofauna, which comprise a substantial proportion of forest biodiversity, play vital roles in maintaining soil processes and overall ecosystem health. This study assessed the long-term effects of four forest management treatments, preparation cutting (partial cutting), retention tree group, gap-cutting, and clear-cutting, on various soil mesofauna groups (Acari, Collembola, Protura, Diplura, Symphyla, Pauropoda) in a managed oak forest in Hungary, sampled six and nine years after intervention. The treatments significantly influenced mesofaunal communities, although responses varied by taxon. Acari and Protura displayed the clearest gradients, with densities declining from control plots to more intensively disturbed treatments. Other groups showed more variable patterns, often shaped by seasonal dynamics. Retention tree group and preparation cutting were the most successful at maintaining mesofaunal densities at levels comparable to, or even exceeding, those in undisturbed sites. In contrast, clear-cutting and gap-cutting were associated with lower densities in several taxa, although some recovery was evident due to vegetation regrowth over time. The findings highlight the importance of seasonal timing in ecological assessments, with treatment effects most pronounced in spring and autumn. Taxon-specific responses, particularly those of Protura, Acari, and Collembola, demonstrate the potential of soil mesofauna as sensitive indicators of ecological change and recovery following forest management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"598 ","pages":"Article 123196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725007042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests hold both ecological and economic value, but as the majority are now under human management, there is an increasing need for silvicultural strategies that support biodiversity and ecosystem functioning alongside timber production. Soil mesofauna, which comprise a substantial proportion of forest biodiversity, play vital roles in maintaining soil processes and overall ecosystem health. This study assessed the long-term effects of four forest management treatments, preparation cutting (partial cutting), retention tree group, gap-cutting, and clear-cutting, on various soil mesofauna groups (Acari, Collembola, Protura, Diplura, Symphyla, Pauropoda) in a managed oak forest in Hungary, sampled six and nine years after intervention. The treatments significantly influenced mesofaunal communities, although responses varied by taxon. Acari and Protura displayed the clearest gradients, with densities declining from control plots to more intensively disturbed treatments. Other groups showed more variable patterns, often shaped by seasonal dynamics. Retention tree group and preparation cutting were the most successful at maintaining mesofaunal densities at levels comparable to, or even exceeding, those in undisturbed sites. In contrast, clear-cutting and gap-cutting were associated with lower densities in several taxa, although some recovery was evident due to vegetation regrowth over time. The findings highlight the importance of seasonal timing in ecological assessments, with treatment effects most pronounced in spring and autumn. Taxon-specific responses, particularly those of Protura, Acari, and Collembola, demonstrate the potential of soil mesofauna as sensitive indicators of ecological change and recovery following forest management.
不同林业管理措施对更新期土壤中系动物的影响
森林具有生态和经济价值,但由于大多数森林现在处于人类管理之下,因此越来越需要在木材生产的同时支持生物多样性和生态系统功能的造林战略。土壤中系动物占森林生物多样性的很大一部分,在维持土壤过程和整个生态系统健康方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究评估了四种森林管理措施(预备砍伐(部分砍伐)、保留树组、间隙砍伐和完全砍伐)对匈牙利一处管理栎林土壤中系动物类群(蜱螨、弹虫、原虫、双虫、联门、猴足目)的长期影响,这些措施在干预后6年和9年取样。尽管不同分类群的响应不同,但这些处理显著影响了中系群落。蜱螨和原孔虫的密度梯度最明显,从对照区到更强烈的干扰处理,密度呈下降趋势。其他群体表现出更多的变化模式,通常受季节动态的影响。保留树组和预备砍伐最成功地将中系群落密度维持在与未受干扰地点相当甚至超过的水平。相比之下,在一些分类群中,净伐和间隙砍伐与较低的密度相关,尽管随着时间的推移,由于植被的再生,一些恢复是明显的。研究结果强调了生态评估中季节时机的重要性,治疗效果在春季和秋季最为明显。土壤中动物群的特异响应,特别是原纲、蜱螨和弹虫的响应,显示了土壤中动物群作为森林管理后生态变化和恢复的敏感指标的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信