Norbert Flórián , Veronika Gergócs-Winkler , Bence Kovács , Réka Aszalós , András Bidló , Péter Ódor
{"title":"Effects of different forestry management practices on soil mesofauna in the regeneration phase","authors":"Norbert Flórián , Veronika Gergócs-Winkler , Bence Kovács , Réka Aszalós , András Bidló , Péter Ódor","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests hold both ecological and economic value, but as the majority are now under human management, there is an increasing need for silvicultural strategies that support biodiversity and ecosystem functioning alongside timber production. Soil mesofauna, which comprise a substantial proportion of forest biodiversity, play vital roles in maintaining soil processes and overall ecosystem health. This study assessed the long-term effects of four forest management treatments, preparation cutting (partial cutting), retention tree group, gap-cutting, and clear-cutting, on various soil mesofauna groups (Acari, Collembola, Protura, Diplura, Symphyla, Pauropoda) in a managed oak forest in Hungary, sampled six and nine years after intervention. The treatments significantly influenced mesofaunal communities, although responses varied by taxon. Acari and Protura displayed the clearest gradients, with densities declining from control plots to more intensively disturbed treatments. Other groups showed more variable patterns, often shaped by seasonal dynamics. Retention tree group and preparation cutting were the most successful at maintaining mesofaunal densities at levels comparable to, or even exceeding, those in undisturbed sites. In contrast, clear-cutting and gap-cutting were associated with lower densities in several taxa, although some recovery was evident due to vegetation regrowth over time. The findings highlight the importance of seasonal timing in ecological assessments, with treatment effects most pronounced in spring and autumn. Taxon-specific responses, particularly those of Protura, Acari, and Collembola, demonstrate the potential of soil mesofauna as sensitive indicators of ecological change and recovery following forest management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"598 ","pages":"Article 123196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725007042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forests hold both ecological and economic value, but as the majority are now under human management, there is an increasing need for silvicultural strategies that support biodiversity and ecosystem functioning alongside timber production. Soil mesofauna, which comprise a substantial proportion of forest biodiversity, play vital roles in maintaining soil processes and overall ecosystem health. This study assessed the long-term effects of four forest management treatments, preparation cutting (partial cutting), retention tree group, gap-cutting, and clear-cutting, on various soil mesofauna groups (Acari, Collembola, Protura, Diplura, Symphyla, Pauropoda) in a managed oak forest in Hungary, sampled six and nine years after intervention. The treatments significantly influenced mesofaunal communities, although responses varied by taxon. Acari and Protura displayed the clearest gradients, with densities declining from control plots to more intensively disturbed treatments. Other groups showed more variable patterns, often shaped by seasonal dynamics. Retention tree group and preparation cutting were the most successful at maintaining mesofaunal densities at levels comparable to, or even exceeding, those in undisturbed sites. In contrast, clear-cutting and gap-cutting were associated with lower densities in several taxa, although some recovery was evident due to vegetation regrowth over time. The findings highlight the importance of seasonal timing in ecological assessments, with treatment effects most pronounced in spring and autumn. Taxon-specific responses, particularly those of Protura, Acari, and Collembola, demonstrate the potential of soil mesofauna as sensitive indicators of ecological change and recovery following forest management.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.