Comparative analysis of unmanned rice production methods in China: an evaluation of energy and economic benefits

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Haibin Zhu, Yuankun Gu, Yuan Feng, Kaiwei Zhang, Yang Wang, Zhipeng Xing, Hui Gao, Haiyan Wei, Hongcheng Zhang, Qun Hu
{"title":"Comparative analysis of unmanned rice production methods in China: an evaluation of energy and economic benefits","authors":"Haibin Zhu,&nbsp;Yuankun Gu,&nbsp;Yuan Feng,&nbsp;Kaiwei Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Wang,&nbsp;Zhipeng Xing,&nbsp;Hui Gao,&nbsp;Haiyan Wei,&nbsp;Hongcheng Zhang,&nbsp;Qun Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To explore the potential application value of various unmanned rice planting methods, we performed quantitative comparisons of energy utilization and economic benefits for unmanned aerial seeding (UAS), unmanned dry direct seeding (UDDS), and unmanned carpet transplanting (UCT) from 2021 to 2023. The results showed that the total energy inputs in UAS and UDDS were significantly lower than that in UCT, reflecting decreases of 10.13 % and 13.84 %, respectively. UCT demanded considerably more diesel, water, plastics, and labor than the other methods, while UAS significantly reduced inputs of machinery, diesel, water, and labor but increased inputs of electricity, seeds, and farm chemicals. Meanwhile, UDDS further decreased diesel and water consumption despite more machinery input. Although both UAS and UDDS caused lower energy outputs of grain and straw yields, only UDDS showed a significant difference from UCT, while all methods exhibited similar net energy. Additionally, UAS and UDDS significantly outperformed UCT in energy use efficiency, profitability, and productivity, while also significantly reducing specific energy consumption. Both economic income and cost trends were UCT &gt; UAS &gt; UCT, with UAS and UCT differing significantly only in costs, while UDDS and UCT differed significantly in both indicators. However, there was no statical difference in net profit or net return rate among the methods. These findings suggest that UAS is promising for rice unmanned cultivation with the characteristics of low-cost and high-income and coordinating grain yield and food security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"337 ","pages":"Article 138671"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225043130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the potential application value of various unmanned rice planting methods, we performed quantitative comparisons of energy utilization and economic benefits for unmanned aerial seeding (UAS), unmanned dry direct seeding (UDDS), and unmanned carpet transplanting (UCT) from 2021 to 2023. The results showed that the total energy inputs in UAS and UDDS were significantly lower than that in UCT, reflecting decreases of 10.13 % and 13.84 %, respectively. UCT demanded considerably more diesel, water, plastics, and labor than the other methods, while UAS significantly reduced inputs of machinery, diesel, water, and labor but increased inputs of electricity, seeds, and farm chemicals. Meanwhile, UDDS further decreased diesel and water consumption despite more machinery input. Although both UAS and UDDS caused lower energy outputs of grain and straw yields, only UDDS showed a significant difference from UCT, while all methods exhibited similar net energy. Additionally, UAS and UDDS significantly outperformed UCT in energy use efficiency, profitability, and productivity, while also significantly reducing specific energy consumption. Both economic income and cost trends were UCT > UAS > UCT, with UAS and UCT differing significantly only in costs, while UDDS and UCT differed significantly in both indicators. However, there was no statical difference in net profit or net return rate among the methods. These findings suggest that UAS is promising for rice unmanned cultivation with the characteristics of low-cost and high-income and coordinating grain yield and food security.
中国水稻无人化生产方式的比较分析:能源效益与经济效益评价
为探索各种水稻无人种植方式的潜在应用价值,从2021年到2023年,对无人空中播种(UAS)、无人干播(UDDS)和无人地毯移栽(UCT)的能源利用和经济效益进行了定量比较。结果表明,UAS和UDDS的总能量投入显著低于UCT,分别减少了10.13%和13.84%。UCT比其他方法需要更多的柴油、水、塑料和劳动力,而UAS显著减少了机器、柴油、水和劳动力的投入,但增加了电力、种子和农用化学品的投入。同时,在机械投入增加的情况下,UDDS进一步降低了柴油和水的消耗。虽然UAS和UDDS方法均降低了谷物和秸秆产量的能量输出,但只有UDDS方法与UCT方法表现出显著差异,而所有方法的净能量相近。此外,UAS和UDDS在能源使用效率、盈利能力和生产力方面明显优于UCT,同时也显著降低了比能耗。经济收入和成本趋势均为UCT >; UAS >; UCT,其中UAS和UCT仅在成本上存在显著差异,而UDDS和UCT在这两个指标上均存在显著差异。然而,在净利润和净回报率方面,不同方法之间没有统计学差异。研究结果表明,无人机系统具有低成本、高收入、协调粮食产量和粮食安全的特点,是一种很有前景的水稻无人栽培技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信