Risk factors and intraoperative identification of non-lepidic predominant lung adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodule: A multicenter study

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110471
Donglai Chen , Qifeng Ding , Yongzhong Li , Zhangqiang Chen , Jian Shu , Yiming Mao , Shanzhou Duan , Lijie Tan , Yongbing Chen
{"title":"Risk factors and intraoperative identification of non-lepidic predominant lung adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodule: A multicenter study","authors":"Donglai Chen ,&nbsp;Qifeng Ding ,&nbsp;Yongzhong Li ,&nbsp;Zhangqiang Chen ,&nbsp;Jian Shu ,&nbsp;Yiming Mao ,&nbsp;Shanzhou Duan ,&nbsp;Lijie Tan ,&nbsp;Yongbing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic factors for non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodules. The feasibility of detecting non-lepidic predominant patterns on frozen section (FS) was also evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter retrospective cohort of 614 patients with clinical T1N0M0 non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodule was included. Two subgroups were divided based on the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) on lung window: ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant subgroup (CTR&lt;0.5), solid-dominant subgroup (CTR≥0.5). Kaplan-Meier approach and multivariable Cox models were used to identify risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). FS and final pathology (FP) of 100 specimens were also reviewed by five pathologists for tumor grading synchronously.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Multivariate analysis indicated that segmentectomy was a risk factor for shortened RFS and OS in the solid-dominant subgroup rather than in the GGO-dominant one. Subset analysis demonstrated survival disadvantages of segmentectomy for high-grade adenocarcinoma but not for intermediate-grade one in the solid-dominant subgroup. However, segmentectomy exhibited non-inferiority to lobectomy in the GGO-dominant subgroup irrespective of tumor grade. The overall accuracy of identifying non-lepidic patterns was 84 % with a good interobserver agreement. Multivariable logistic analysis identified presence of complex glandular pattern and acinar pattern as independent predictors of the discrepancy between FS and FP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Segmentectomy should be cautiously performed for patients with radiologically solid-dominant non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma, especially for those with high-grade patterns. FS had high diagnostic accuracy and satisfactory interobserver agreement for tumor grading, which might aid surgeons in determining the appropriate surgical procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 12","pages":"Article 110471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325008996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic factors for non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodules. The feasibility of detecting non-lepidic predominant patterns on frozen section (FS) was also evaluated.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective cohort of 614 patients with clinical T1N0M0 non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as subsolid nodule was included. Two subgroups were divided based on the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) on lung window: ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant subgroup (CTR<0.5), solid-dominant subgroup (CTR≥0.5). Kaplan-Meier approach and multivariable Cox models were used to identify risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). FS and final pathology (FP) of 100 specimens were also reviewed by five pathologists for tumor grading synchronously.

Results

Multivariate analysis indicated that segmentectomy was a risk factor for shortened RFS and OS in the solid-dominant subgroup rather than in the GGO-dominant one. Subset analysis demonstrated survival disadvantages of segmentectomy for high-grade adenocarcinoma but not for intermediate-grade one in the solid-dominant subgroup. However, segmentectomy exhibited non-inferiority to lobectomy in the GGO-dominant subgroup irrespective of tumor grade. The overall accuracy of identifying non-lepidic patterns was 84 % with a good interobserver agreement. Multivariable logistic analysis identified presence of complex glandular pattern and acinar pattern as independent predictors of the discrepancy between FS and FP.

Conclusions

Segmentectomy should be cautiously performed for patients with radiologically solid-dominant non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma, especially for those with high-grade patterns. FS had high diagnostic accuracy and satisfactory interobserver agreement for tumor grading, which might aid surgeons in determining the appropriate surgical procedure.
以实下结节为表现的非肺腺癌的危险因素和术中鉴别:一项多中心研究
背景:本研究的目的是评估以实下结节为表现的非浸润性腺癌的预后因素。在冷冻切片(FS)上检测非卵黄显性模式的可行性也进行了评价。方法对614例临床T1N0M0型非鳞状浸润性腺癌患者进行多中心回顾性分析。根据肺窗实变与肿瘤比(CTR)分为两个亚组:磨玻璃浊(GGO)-优势亚组(CTR<0.5),实体优势亚组(CTR≥0.5)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox模型确定无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的危险因素。同时由5名病理医师同步复查100例标本的FS和最终病理(FP),进行肿瘤分级。结果多因素分析表明,节段切除术是固体优势亚组RFS和OS缩短的危险因素,而非go优势亚组。亚组分析显示,在固体优势亚组中,高级别腺癌的节段切除术存在生存劣势,而中等级别腺癌则没有。然而,无论肿瘤级别如何,在以ggo为主的亚组中,节段切除术与肺叶切除术相比均表现出非劣效性。识别非黄斑图案的总体准确性为84%,观察者间一致性良好。多变量logistic分析发现,复杂腺型和腺泡型的存在是FS和FP差异的独立预测因素。结论对于放射学上以实性为主的非鳞状浸润性腺癌,尤其是高级别浸润性腺癌,应谨慎行节段切除术。FS具有较高的诊断准确性和令人满意的肿瘤分级观察者之间的一致性,这可能有助于外科医生确定合适的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信