Fuel stacking, housing quality, and health disparities in rural South Africa: A double machine learning approach

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Nouran Zenelabden , Adeola Oyenubi , Johane Dikgang
{"title":"Fuel stacking, housing quality, and health disparities in rural South Africa: A double machine learning approach","authors":"Nouran Zenelabden ,&nbsp;Adeola Oyenubi ,&nbsp;Johane Dikgang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between fuel type, housing quality, and health outcomes is examined in rural South Africa using the 2019 General Household Survey dataset from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). We apply double machine learning within a multivalued treatment effects framework to distinguish between clean, unclean, and mixed fuel types as treatment regimes, allowing us to infer health impacts from fuel-stacking behavior. Our findings show that using mixed fuels does not lead to health benefits from partially switching away from unclean fuels, which challenges common beliefs about “energy stacking” in low-income households. We also use Sorted Effects Analysis (SEA) to explore differences within the population and identify vulnerable groups most affected by the health risks of unclean fuel use. The SEA results reveal that the health effects of polluting fuels are not uniform, and there is some evidence that housing quality—such as roofing and walls—moderates the relationship between polluting fuels and health outcomes. These findings suggest that effective policies should consider the roles of fuel type, housing quality, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities to promote a fair and equitable transition to clean energy in rural South Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108926"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between fuel type, housing quality, and health outcomes is examined in rural South Africa using the 2019 General Household Survey dataset from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). We apply double machine learning within a multivalued treatment effects framework to distinguish between clean, unclean, and mixed fuel types as treatment regimes, allowing us to infer health impacts from fuel-stacking behavior. Our findings show that using mixed fuels does not lead to health benefits from partially switching away from unclean fuels, which challenges common beliefs about “energy stacking” in low-income households. We also use Sorted Effects Analysis (SEA) to explore differences within the population and identify vulnerable groups most affected by the health risks of unclean fuel use. The SEA results reveal that the health effects of polluting fuels are not uniform, and there is some evidence that housing quality—such as roofing and walls—moderates the relationship between polluting fuels and health outcomes. These findings suggest that effective policies should consider the roles of fuel type, housing quality, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities to promote a fair and equitable transition to clean energy in rural South Africa.
南非农村的燃料堆积、住房质量和健康差距:双重机器学习方法
使用南非统计局(StatsSA)的2019年综合家庭调查数据集,研究了南非农村燃料类型、住房质量和健康结果之间的关系。我们在多值处理效果框架内应用双重机器学习,以区分清洁、不清洁和混合燃料类型作为处理方案,使我们能够从燃料堆积行为中推断健康影响。我们的研究结果表明,使用混合燃料并不能从部分放弃不清洁燃料中获得健康益处,这挑战了低收入家庭“能量堆积”的普遍观念。我们还使用分类效应分析(SEA)来探索人口内部的差异,并确定受不清洁燃料使用健康风险影响最大的弱势群体。环评结果显示,污染燃料对健康的影响并不均匀,有证据表明,住房质量(如屋顶和墙壁)调节了污染燃料与健康结果之间的关系。这些发现表明,有效的政策应考虑燃料类型、住房质量和社会经济脆弱性的作用,以促进南非农村向清洁能源的公平和公平过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信