{"title":"Global heterogeneity in ETS rollouts and subsequent decarbonization outcomes","authors":"Arzi Adbi , Sumit Agarwal , Siddharth Natarajan","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines emissions trading schemes (ETSs) worldwide and assesses their impact on multiple decarbonization outcomes, namely carbon intensity reduction, absolute emission reduction, and renewable energy adoption. Leveraging spatial-and-temporal variations in ETS introductions and weighted-average ETS carbon prices, we assess the impact of ETSs globally. Our findings indicate that although ETSs have the potential to drive decarbonization, their impacts vary substantially across the world. A key finding is that ETS impacts are significantly shaped by an economy's structural dependence on natural resource rents: greater dependence on natural resource rents weakens the effect of ETS introduction on renewable energy adoption. We also find that ETSs are effective in reducing carbon intensity more in developing economies than in developed economies. Additionally, nationwide ETSs are more effective than partial rollouts. Further, beyond the extensive margin analysis (effect of ETS introduction), the intensive margin analysis reveals that temporal increases in weighted-average ETS carbon price amplify emissions reduction and renewable energy adoption. Overall, our investigation highlights the potential as well as limits of ETSs, suggesting that the economic contexts surrounding ETS rollouts play a substantial role in shaping their effectiveness in accomplishing decarbonization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108921"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines emissions trading schemes (ETSs) worldwide and assesses their impact on multiple decarbonization outcomes, namely carbon intensity reduction, absolute emission reduction, and renewable energy adoption. Leveraging spatial-and-temporal variations in ETS introductions and weighted-average ETS carbon prices, we assess the impact of ETSs globally. Our findings indicate that although ETSs have the potential to drive decarbonization, their impacts vary substantially across the world. A key finding is that ETS impacts are significantly shaped by an economy's structural dependence on natural resource rents: greater dependence on natural resource rents weakens the effect of ETS introduction on renewable energy adoption. We also find that ETSs are effective in reducing carbon intensity more in developing economies than in developed economies. Additionally, nationwide ETSs are more effective than partial rollouts. Further, beyond the extensive margin analysis (effect of ETS introduction), the intensive margin analysis reveals that temporal increases in weighted-average ETS carbon price amplify emissions reduction and renewable energy adoption. Overall, our investigation highlights the potential as well as limits of ETSs, suggesting that the economic contexts surrounding ETS rollouts play a substantial role in shaping their effectiveness in accomplishing decarbonization.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.