M.M.J. Crismani , M.S. Chaffin , K. Connour , N.M. Schneider , S. Curry , J. Deighan , R. Fitzpatrick , S. Jain , G. Liuzzi , M. Slipski , G.L. Villanueva
{"title":"High-altitude Martian plume is likely an ordinary twilight cloud","authors":"M.M.J. Crismani , M.S. Chaffin , K. Connour , N.M. Schneider , S. Curry , J. Deighan , R. Fitzpatrick , S. Jain , G. Liuzzi , M. Slipski , G.L. Villanueva","doi":"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead, more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13199,"journal":{"name":"Icarus","volume":"444 ","pages":"Article 116823"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icarus","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103525003719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead, more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.
期刊介绍:
Icarus is devoted to the publication of original contributions in the field of Solar System studies. Manuscripts reporting the results of new research - observational, experimental, or theoretical - concerning the astronomy, geology, meteorology, physics, chemistry, biology, and other scientific aspects of our Solar System or extrasolar systems are welcome. The journal generally does not publish papers devoted exclusively to the Sun, the Earth, celestial mechanics, meteoritics, or astrophysics. Icarus does not publish papers that provide "improved" versions of Bode''s law, or other numerical relations, without a sound physical basis. Icarus does not publish meeting announcements or general notices. Reviews, historical papers, and manuscripts describing spacecraft instrumentation may be considered, but only with prior approval of the editor. An entire issue of the journal is occasionally devoted to a single subject, usually arising from a conference on the same topic. The language of publication is English. American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these.