Time-shifting storage scheme via electricity price arbitrage: Techno-economic optimization for carbon dioxide compression cost reduction in carbon capture, utilization and storage

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Liugan Zhang , Die Wei , Meina Xie , Renchun Zheng , Kai Ye , Longxiang Chen
{"title":"Time-shifting storage scheme via electricity price arbitrage: Techno-economic optimization for carbon dioxide compression cost reduction in carbon capture, utilization and storage","authors":"Liugan Zhang ,&nbsp;Die Wei ,&nbsp;Meina Xie ,&nbsp;Renchun Zheng ,&nbsp;Kai Ye ,&nbsp;Longxiang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global decarbonization policies have heightened the urgency of developing carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies. Despite advances in capture methodologies, energy-intensive compression of captured carbon dioxide remains a critical bottleneck in reducing overall capture costs. Current optimization efforts primarily focus on internal technical improvements but overlook external operational factors, such as electricity pricing. Fluctuating electricity prices under time-of-use policies directly impact the daily operating costs of the carbon dioxide compression unit. Therefore, this study proposes a time-shifting storage scheme that exploits electricity price variations across different periods to reduce compression costs. Furthermore, the vapor compression refrigeration and organic Rankine cycles are employed to optimize energy utilization. Five simulation cases are conducted. The results show that under design conditions, Case 2 (carbon dioxide is temporarily stored during peak periods) achieves a levelized cost of compression of 12.62 $/tonne, which is 20.68 % lower than conventional compression compared to Case 1 (15.91 $/tonne). Moreover, Case 3 (carbon dioxide is stored during peak and shoulder periods) demonstrates a significantly lower cost of 10.15 $/tonne, indicating a 36.02 % reduction. Integrating two thermodynamic cycles in Case 3 reduced specific energy consumption from 97.44 kWh/tonne to 92.36 kWh/tonne and 93.71 kWh/tonne. The system exergetic efficiency increased from 62.39 % to 65.55 % and 64.87 %, yielding additional cost reductions of 2.36 % and 1.81 %, respectively. In full-chain carbon capture processes where the carbon dioxide compression system accounts for 30 % of the total cost, adopting the time-shifting storage scheme (Case 3) results in a 10.80 % reduction in aggregate costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 120572"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425010969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global decarbonization policies have heightened the urgency of developing carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies. Despite advances in capture methodologies, energy-intensive compression of captured carbon dioxide remains a critical bottleneck in reducing overall capture costs. Current optimization efforts primarily focus on internal technical improvements but overlook external operational factors, such as electricity pricing. Fluctuating electricity prices under time-of-use policies directly impact the daily operating costs of the carbon dioxide compression unit. Therefore, this study proposes a time-shifting storage scheme that exploits electricity price variations across different periods to reduce compression costs. Furthermore, the vapor compression refrigeration and organic Rankine cycles are employed to optimize energy utilization. Five simulation cases are conducted. The results show that under design conditions, Case 2 (carbon dioxide is temporarily stored during peak periods) achieves a levelized cost of compression of 12.62 $/tonne, which is 20.68 % lower than conventional compression compared to Case 1 (15.91 $/tonne). Moreover, Case 3 (carbon dioxide is stored during peak and shoulder periods) demonstrates a significantly lower cost of 10.15 $/tonne, indicating a 36.02 % reduction. Integrating two thermodynamic cycles in Case 3 reduced specific energy consumption from 97.44 kWh/tonne to 92.36 kWh/tonne and 93.71 kWh/tonne. The system exergetic efficiency increased from 62.39 % to 65.55 % and 64.87 %, yielding additional cost reductions of 2.36 % and 1.81 %, respectively. In full-chain carbon capture processes where the carbon dioxide compression system accounts for 30 % of the total cost, adopting the time-shifting storage scheme (Case 3) results in a 10.80 % reduction in aggregate costs.
基于电价套利的时移储能方案:降低碳捕集利用与封存二氧化碳压缩成本的技术经济优化
全球脱碳政策提高了开发碳捕获、利用和储存技术的紧迫性。尽管捕集方法取得了进步,但对捕获的二氧化碳进行能源密集型压缩仍然是降低总体捕集成本的关键瓶颈。目前的优化工作主要集中在内部技术改进,而忽略了外部操作因素,如电价。在分时政策下波动的电价直接影响二氧化碳压缩装置的日常运营成本。因此,本研究提出了一种时移存储方案,利用不同时期的电价变化来降低压缩成本。此外,采用蒸汽压缩制冷和有机朗肯循环优化能源利用。进行了5个仿真案例。结果表明,在设计条件下,案例2(二氧化碳在高峰期临时储存)实现了12.62美元/吨的平化压缩成本,与案例1(15.91美元/吨)相比,降低了20.68%。此外,案例3(二氧化碳在峰值和肩扛期储存)显示成本显著降低,为10.15美元/吨,减少了36.02%。在案例3中整合两个热力学循环将比能耗从97.44千瓦时/吨降低到92.36千瓦时/吨和93.71千瓦时/吨。系统的用能效率从62.39%提高到65.55%和64.87%,成本分别降低了2.36%和1.81%。在二氧化碳压缩系统占总成本30%的全链碳捕集过程中,采用时移存储方案(案例3)可使总成本降低10.80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信