How to shape corporate green behavior? — The green governance effect of executive incentive strategies

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ningning Zhang , Yawen Wang
{"title":"How to shape corporate green behavior? — The green governance effect of executive incentive strategies","authors":"Ningning Zhang ,&nbsp;Yawen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to the growing global demand for sustainable development, this study investigates how executive incentive structures shape corporate green behavior in Chinese listed firms. We distinguish among three types of incentives: monetary, equity-based, and consumption-related. Empirical results indicate that performance-driven monetary and equity incentives significantly enhance firms’ environmental engagement. Monetary incentives promote green behavior primarily through improving information transparency and investment efficiency, while equity-based incentives work by reinforcing long-term value orientation and optimizing capital allocation. In contrast, consumption-related incentives substantially hinder green behavior, mainly by weakening managerial sentiment and crowding out resources for environmental initiatives. Further evidence shows that analyst attention amplifies the positive effects of performance-oriented incentives and partially mitigates the negative impacts of consumption-oriented ones. These findings are robust across multiple specifications, including lagged variables, propensity score matching, Heckman correction, and the inclusion of province-year and industry-year fixed effects. The study contributes theoretically by advancing principal–agent theory in the sustainability context and clarifying the mechanisms linking executive compensation to environmental outcomes. Practically, it provides evidence to inform the design of green compensation packages and offers regulatory insights for strengthening environmental disclosure requirements. While grounded in the Chinese context, the findings carry global relevance, offering valuable implications for emerging markets and advanced economies alike in promoting corporate green transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 104612"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025007750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the growing global demand for sustainable development, this study investigates how executive incentive structures shape corporate green behavior in Chinese listed firms. We distinguish among three types of incentives: monetary, equity-based, and consumption-related. Empirical results indicate that performance-driven monetary and equity incentives significantly enhance firms’ environmental engagement. Monetary incentives promote green behavior primarily through improving information transparency and investment efficiency, while equity-based incentives work by reinforcing long-term value orientation and optimizing capital allocation. In contrast, consumption-related incentives substantially hinder green behavior, mainly by weakening managerial sentiment and crowding out resources for environmental initiatives. Further evidence shows that analyst attention amplifies the positive effects of performance-oriented incentives and partially mitigates the negative impacts of consumption-oriented ones. These findings are robust across multiple specifications, including lagged variables, propensity score matching, Heckman correction, and the inclusion of province-year and industry-year fixed effects. The study contributes theoretically by advancing principal–agent theory in the sustainability context and clarifying the mechanisms linking executive compensation to environmental outcomes. Practically, it provides evidence to inform the design of green compensation packages and offers regulatory insights for strengthening environmental disclosure requirements. While grounded in the Chinese context, the findings carry global relevance, offering valuable implications for emerging markets and advanced economies alike in promoting corporate green transformation.
如何塑造企业的绿色行为?——高管激励策略的绿色治理效应
为应对全球对可持续发展日益增长的需求,本研究探讨了中国上市公司高管激励结构如何塑造公司绿色行为。我们区分了三种类型的激励:货币激励、股权激励和消费激励。实证结果表明,绩效驱动的货币激励和股权激励显著增强了企业的环境参与。货币激励主要通过提高信息透明度和投资效率来促进绿色行为,股权激励主要通过强化长期价值导向和优化资本配置来促进绿色行为。相比之下,与消费有关的激励措施主要通过削弱管理情绪和挤出用于环境倡议的资源而严重阻碍绿色行为。进一步的证据表明,分析师关注放大了绩效导向激励的积极影响,部分缓解了消费导向激励的负面影响。这些发现在多个规范中都是稳健的,包括滞后变量、倾向得分匹配、Heckman校正,以及包括省年和行业年固定效应。本研究通过在可持续性背景下推进委托代理理论,阐明高管薪酬与环境结果之间的联系机制,在理论上做出了贡献。实际上,它为绿色薪酬方案的设计提供了证据,并为加强环境披露要求提供了监管见解。虽然研究结果基于中国背景,但具有全球相关性,为新兴市场和发达经济体促进企业绿色转型提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信