{"title":"Surface orientation dependent electrochemical stability of RuO2 and IrO2 under acidic oxygen evolution reaction","authors":"Naomi Naraki, Yuto Okayama, Naoto Todoroki","doi":"10.1016/j.elecom.2025.108048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ru- and Ir-oxides have considerable attentions as acidic oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. However, there have been no reports of comparative study of electrochemical stability depending on the surface orientations. Here, we prepared the (<em>hkl</em>)-oriented (<em>hkl</em> = 110, 001, 100) RuO<sub>2</sub> and IrO<sub>2</sub> thin films on rutile-TiO<sub>2</sub> single crystal substrates by arc-plasma deposition and investigated the surface orientation dependence of electrochemical stability under oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in 0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub>. At the initial state, RuO<sub>2</sub> showed a lower OER overpotential and smaller Tafel slope compared to IrO<sub>2</sub> for all the surface orientations. However, the overpotential of RuO<sub>2</sub> steeply increased during chronopotentiometry (CP) measurements, while the overpotential increase for IrO<sub>2</sub> was significantly suppressed. After the CP measurement, the overpotential of IrO<sub>2</sub> became smaller than that of RuO<sub>2</sub> for all the surface orientation. RuO<sub>2</sub> shows orientation dependence on the stability number, i.e. ratio of total charges used for CP and dissolution amount of Ru or Ir, while the IrO<sub>2</sub> didn't show a clear trend. The results demonstrated that the surface orientation of both RuO<sub>2</sub> and IrO<sub>2</sub> affects not only the activity, but also the stability, and elemental dissolution and the influence is more significant for RuO<sub>2</sub>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":304,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemistry Communications","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 108048"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrochemistry Communications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388248125001882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ru- and Ir-oxides have considerable attentions as acidic oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. However, there have been no reports of comparative study of electrochemical stability depending on the surface orientations. Here, we prepared the (hkl)-oriented (hkl = 110, 001, 100) RuO2 and IrO2 thin films on rutile-TiO2 single crystal substrates by arc-plasma deposition and investigated the surface orientation dependence of electrochemical stability under oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in 0.1 M HClO4. At the initial state, RuO2 showed a lower OER overpotential and smaller Tafel slope compared to IrO2 for all the surface orientations. However, the overpotential of RuO2 steeply increased during chronopotentiometry (CP) measurements, while the overpotential increase for IrO2 was significantly suppressed. After the CP measurement, the overpotential of IrO2 became smaller than that of RuO2 for all the surface orientation. RuO2 shows orientation dependence on the stability number, i.e. ratio of total charges used for CP and dissolution amount of Ru or Ir, while the IrO2 didn't show a clear trend. The results demonstrated that the surface orientation of both RuO2 and IrO2 affects not only the activity, but also the stability, and elemental dissolution and the influence is more significant for RuO2.
期刊介绍:
Electrochemistry Communications is an open access journal providing fast dissemination of short communications, full communications and mini reviews covering the whole field of electrochemistry which merit urgent publication. Short communications are limited to a maximum of 20,000 characters (including spaces) while full communications and mini reviews are limited to 25,000 characters (including spaces). Supplementary information is permitted for full communications and mini reviews but not for short communications. We aim to be the fastest journal in electrochemistry for these types of papers.