Zining Wang , Mai Nguyen , Jaewoo Park , Yanzhe Yuan
{"title":"From perceived healthiness to acceptance: How influencer type shapes consumer acceptance of insect-based foods","authors":"Zining Wang , Mai Nguyen , Jaewoo Park , Yanzhe Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the rise of influencer marketing in the food sector and the ongoing challenge of promoting consumer acceptance of insect-based foods, this research investigated how influencer type (health-focused vs. indulgence-focused) affects consumer acceptance and identified underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. Across three experiments, endorsements from health-focused influencers consistently enhanced consumers' perceptions of the healthiness of insect-based foods, which in turn significantly increased their acceptance. In contrast, perceived tastiness did not significantly differ by influencer type and did not mediate the overall effect, although it consistently emerged as a stronger predictor of acceptance than perceived healthiness. Moderated mediation analyses further revealed that the positive indirect effect of health-focused influencers on consumer acceptance via enhanced healthiness perceptions was more pronounced for hedonic (vs. utilitarian) insect-based foods. Moreover, this indirect effect was significant only among individuals with high health consciousness and no prior experience with consuming such products. While the mediating role of perceived tastiness was consistently insignificant, the impact of perceived tastiness on acceptance was significantly weaker among highly health-conscious consumers and stronger among those with prior experience consuming insect-based foods. By contrast, no significant moderating effects were observed for food neophobia or disgust toward entomophagy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105719"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given the rise of influencer marketing in the food sector and the ongoing challenge of promoting consumer acceptance of insect-based foods, this research investigated how influencer type (health-focused vs. indulgence-focused) affects consumer acceptance and identified underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. Across three experiments, endorsements from health-focused influencers consistently enhanced consumers' perceptions of the healthiness of insect-based foods, which in turn significantly increased their acceptance. In contrast, perceived tastiness did not significantly differ by influencer type and did not mediate the overall effect, although it consistently emerged as a stronger predictor of acceptance than perceived healthiness. Moderated mediation analyses further revealed that the positive indirect effect of health-focused influencers on consumer acceptance via enhanced healthiness perceptions was more pronounced for hedonic (vs. utilitarian) insect-based foods. Moreover, this indirect effect was significant only among individuals with high health consciousness and no prior experience with consuming such products. While the mediating role of perceived tastiness was consistently insignificant, the impact of perceived tastiness on acceptance was significantly weaker among highly health-conscious consumers and stronger among those with prior experience consuming insect-based foods. By contrast, no significant moderating effects were observed for food neophobia or disgust toward entomophagy.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.