Enhancing biomass-derived oleoresin yield and quality through chemical stimulants and tapping methods in Pinus roxburghii Sargent

IF 5.8 2区 生物学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Saurabh Sharma , Bhupender Dutt , D.R. Bhardwaj , Yash Pal Sharma , Rajneesh Kumar , Jayashree Behera , Sarita Devi
{"title":"Enhancing biomass-derived oleoresin yield and quality through chemical stimulants and tapping methods in Pinus roxburghii Sargent","authors":"Saurabh Sharma ,&nbsp;Bhupender Dutt ,&nbsp;D.R. Bhardwaj ,&nbsp;Yash Pal Sharma ,&nbsp;Rajneesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Jayashree Behera ,&nbsp;Sarita Devi","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oleoresin derived from pine trees is a renewable forest biomass product with diverse industrial and energy applications. In India, <em>Pinus roxburghii</em> Sargent (Chir Pine) is the main commercial source for oleoresin tapping and offers significant potential for sustainable biomass utilization. This study was conducted in Western Himalayan forests to assess the effects of chemical stimulants and tapping methods on both yield and quality of pine oleoresin. Forty-two trees were engaged in two different tapping methods, <em>i.e.,</em> the borehole and rill method, and six different chemical stimulants as treatments. Results indicated the maximum oleoresin yield was obtained from treatment T<sub>7</sub> (20 % H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + 20 % HNO<sub>3</sub>), with the rill method yielding the highest seasonal output (3694.08g/tree/season). However, oleoresin yield per borehole and turpentine content, an important biofuel precursor, were higher with the borehole method, which also proved less detrimental to tree health compared to the rill method, indicating its suitability for sustainable biomass extraction. The rill method, conversely, produced resin with higher rosin content and density. Quality analysis revealed that the chemical composition of oleoresin, critical for bioenergy and bioproduct manufacturing, varied according to both stimulant and tapping method used. Additionally, the borehole method and chemical stimulants accelerated wound healing, preserving tree vitality for biomass accumulation. Overall, these findings highlighted the potential of optimizing tapping methods and chemical stimulants for improving the quality of oleoresin as a biomass-based renewable resource, supporting its role in the bioenergy and bioproduct sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 108379"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425007901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oleoresin derived from pine trees is a renewable forest biomass product with diverse industrial and energy applications. In India, Pinus roxburghii Sargent (Chir Pine) is the main commercial source for oleoresin tapping and offers significant potential for sustainable biomass utilization. This study was conducted in Western Himalayan forests to assess the effects of chemical stimulants and tapping methods on both yield and quality of pine oleoresin. Forty-two trees were engaged in two different tapping methods, i.e., the borehole and rill method, and six different chemical stimulants as treatments. Results indicated the maximum oleoresin yield was obtained from treatment T7 (20 % H2SO4 + 20 % HNO3), with the rill method yielding the highest seasonal output (3694.08g/tree/season). However, oleoresin yield per borehole and turpentine content, an important biofuel precursor, were higher with the borehole method, which also proved less detrimental to tree health compared to the rill method, indicating its suitability for sustainable biomass extraction. The rill method, conversely, produced resin with higher rosin content and density. Quality analysis revealed that the chemical composition of oleoresin, critical for bioenergy and bioproduct manufacturing, varied according to both stimulant and tapping method used. Additionally, the borehole method and chemical stimulants accelerated wound healing, preserving tree vitality for biomass accumulation. Overall, these findings highlighted the potential of optimizing tapping methods and chemical stimulants for improving the quality of oleoresin as a biomass-based renewable resource, supporting its role in the bioenergy and bioproduct sectors.
通过化学刺激和采伐方法提高刺梨松生物质油树脂的产量和质量
从松树中提取的油树脂是一种可再生的森林生物质产品,具有多种工业和能源应用。在印度,roxburghii Sargent (Chir Pine)是油树脂开采的主要商业来源,具有可持续生物质利用的巨大潜力。本研究在喜玛拉雅西部森林进行,以评估化学刺激剂和采伐方法对松脂产量和品质的影响。42棵采油树采用两种不同的采油方法,即钻孔和钻孔法,以及6种不同的化学刺激物作为处理。结果表明:处理T7 (20% H2SO4 + 20% HNO3)产油率最高,其中细沟法产油率最高(3694.08g/树/季);然而,孔钻法的每孔油树脂产量和重要的生物燃料前体松节油含量更高,而且与孔钻法相比,孔钻法对树木健康的危害更小,表明孔钻法适合可持续的生物质提取。相反,细孔法生产的树脂松香含量和密度更高。质量分析显示,对生物能源和生物产品制造至关重要的油树脂的化学成分因使用刺激物和提取方法而异。此外,钻孔法和化学刺激物加速了伤口愈合,保持了树木生物量积累的活力。总的来说,这些发现突出了优化开采方法和化学刺激剂的潜力,以提高油树脂作为生物质可再生资源的质量,支持其在生物能源和生物产品领域的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomass & Bioenergy
Biomass & Bioenergy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy. Key areas covered by the journal: • Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation. • Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal. • Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes • Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation • Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信