Gaoliang Li , Qing Zhen , Jiyong Zheng , Guogang Wang , Zitong Zhang , Shenshen Xing
{"title":"Weathered sandstone application improved the aggregate structure and quality of reconstructed soil: A field study of feldspathic sandstone","authors":"Gaoliang Li , Qing Zhen , Jiyong Zheng , Guogang Wang , Zitong Zhang , Shenshen Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reconstructing soil with appropriate soil materials is a practical measure to improve the structure and quality of degraded soil. Feldspathic sandstone, a type of weathered sandstone, has been proven to improve the amount of water and nutrient in reconstructed soil. However, the long-time effects of feldspathic sandstone application on soil particle surface electrochemical properties and quality remain unclear. In this study, feldspathic sandstone was mixed separately into sandy soil and loess soil at 25 % and 75 % mass ratio to reconstruct soil, and the effects were clarifying through a 9-year field experiment. Results showed feldspathic sandstone application significantly increased the fine particles (diameter < 0.05 mm) content and the complexity of particle distribution in reconstructed soils (<em>P < 0.05</em>). Feldspathic sandstone application increased the specific surface area from 16.07 to 23.17 (25 % application ratio) and 193.17 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> (75 % application ratio, <em>P < 0.05</em>) in sandy soil; from 31.02 to 37.72 (25 % application ratio) and 236.08 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> (75 % application ratio, <em>P < 0.05</em>) in loess soil; increased cation exchange capacity from 4.10 to 10.17 (25 % application ratio) and 22.36 cmol kg<sup>−1</sup> (75 % application ratio) in sandy soil (<em>P < 0.05</em>); from 12.50 to 13.16 (25 % application ratio) and 26.44 cmol kg<sup>−1</sup> (75 % application ratio, <em>P < 0.05</em>) in loess soil. Feldspathic sandstone application also improved the soil particle surface charge density and electric field strength. The organic matter content of reconstructed soils was enhanced with feldspathic sandstone application, and was higher than the natural grassland soil (4.05 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) in this region. The increased fine particles and improved soil particle surface properties jointly increased the macroaggregate (> 0.25 mm) fraction, mean weight diameter of soil aggregate (MWD), and the soil structure coefficient (Qs). However, the water stable aggregates ratio (WSAR) and soil structural stability (SI) were still poor due to the insufficient organic matter and too much silt and clay particles. Our findings provide scientific insight in applying weathered sandstone into reconstructed soil for efficiently restoring degraded soil.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 107816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425003064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reconstructing soil with appropriate soil materials is a practical measure to improve the structure and quality of degraded soil. Feldspathic sandstone, a type of weathered sandstone, has been proven to improve the amount of water and nutrient in reconstructed soil. However, the long-time effects of feldspathic sandstone application on soil particle surface electrochemical properties and quality remain unclear. In this study, feldspathic sandstone was mixed separately into sandy soil and loess soil at 25 % and 75 % mass ratio to reconstruct soil, and the effects were clarifying through a 9-year field experiment. Results showed feldspathic sandstone application significantly increased the fine particles (diameter < 0.05 mm) content and the complexity of particle distribution in reconstructed soils (P < 0.05). Feldspathic sandstone application increased the specific surface area from 16.07 to 23.17 (25 % application ratio) and 193.17 m2 g−1 (75 % application ratio, P < 0.05) in sandy soil; from 31.02 to 37.72 (25 % application ratio) and 236.08 m2 g−1 (75 % application ratio, P < 0.05) in loess soil; increased cation exchange capacity from 4.10 to 10.17 (25 % application ratio) and 22.36 cmol kg−1 (75 % application ratio) in sandy soil (P < 0.05); from 12.50 to 13.16 (25 % application ratio) and 26.44 cmol kg−1 (75 % application ratio, P < 0.05) in loess soil. Feldspathic sandstone application also improved the soil particle surface charge density and electric field strength. The organic matter content of reconstructed soils was enhanced with feldspathic sandstone application, and was higher than the natural grassland soil (4.05 g kg−1) in this region. The increased fine particles and improved soil particle surface properties jointly increased the macroaggregate (> 0.25 mm) fraction, mean weight diameter of soil aggregate (MWD), and the soil structure coefficient (Qs). However, the water stable aggregates ratio (WSAR) and soil structural stability (SI) were still poor due to the insufficient organic matter and too much silt and clay particles. Our findings provide scientific insight in applying weathered sandstone into reconstructed soil for efficiently restoring degraded soil.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.