{"title":"Spatial heterogeneity and environmental drivers of drought vulnerability in the Yangtze River Basin","authors":"Yuting Yang , Yunfei Feng , Xie He , Meng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drought-induced ecological vulnerability is intensifying under global climate change, threatening ecosystem stability and function. Using the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) as a case study, we constructed a Drought Vulnerability Index integrating exposure, sensitivity, and resilience—three core dimensions defined in the IPCC framework. Exposure was represented by drought severity and duration, while sensitivity and resilience were derived from autoregressive modeling of vegetation dynamics using vegetation and climate data from 2001 to 2023. We employed XGBoost with SHAP analysis to disentangle the drivers of spatial heterogeneity. Results reveal strong spatial contrasts: the central-northern YRB shows the highest vulnerability due to concurrent high exposure and sensitivity with low resilience, whereas the western highlands exhibit comparatively low vulnerability despite high exposure, supported by stronger resilience. Quantitative analysis confirms resilience as the dominant determinant of vulnerability, with over 65 % of vegetated pixels showing a significant negative correlation (R < –0.8, p < 0.05) between resilience and vulnerability. Among environmental drivers, altitude, precipitation, and species richness exerted the greatest influence, often with non-linear or threshold effects. Notably, altitude displayed a U-shaped relationship, with both lowlands and highlands being more vulnerable. These findings highlight the central role of resilience in modulating drought vulnerability and provide a robust indicator-based framework for assessing ecological risk and guiding resilience-oriented adaptation strategies under climate extremes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114246"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25011781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drought-induced ecological vulnerability is intensifying under global climate change, threatening ecosystem stability and function. Using the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) as a case study, we constructed a Drought Vulnerability Index integrating exposure, sensitivity, and resilience—three core dimensions defined in the IPCC framework. Exposure was represented by drought severity and duration, while sensitivity and resilience were derived from autoregressive modeling of vegetation dynamics using vegetation and climate data from 2001 to 2023. We employed XGBoost with SHAP analysis to disentangle the drivers of spatial heterogeneity. Results reveal strong spatial contrasts: the central-northern YRB shows the highest vulnerability due to concurrent high exposure and sensitivity with low resilience, whereas the western highlands exhibit comparatively low vulnerability despite high exposure, supported by stronger resilience. Quantitative analysis confirms resilience as the dominant determinant of vulnerability, with over 65 % of vegetated pixels showing a significant negative correlation (R < –0.8, p < 0.05) between resilience and vulnerability. Among environmental drivers, altitude, precipitation, and species richness exerted the greatest influence, often with non-linear or threshold effects. Notably, altitude displayed a U-shaped relationship, with both lowlands and highlands being more vulnerable. These findings highlight the central role of resilience in modulating drought vulnerability and provide a robust indicator-based framework for assessing ecological risk and guiding resilience-oriented adaptation strategies under climate extremes.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.