Extraterritorial political representation in environmental planning: Patterns and practices under the UNECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Matthew Cashmore , Dmytro Skrylnikov
{"title":"Extraterritorial political representation in environmental planning: Patterns and practices under the UNECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context","authors":"Matthew Cashmore ,&nbsp;Dmytro Skrylnikov","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context is significant in the context of environmental governance because it was one of the first multilateral environmental agreements to formalise extraterritorial actors’ involvement in the environmental planning of sovereign nation states. In this article, we examine patterns and practices of extraterritorial political representation under the Espoo Convention and consider its strengths and limitations in extending representation beyond national borders. The analysis draws upon data contained in publicly available national reports submitted by Parties to the Convention under compliance procedures. The data covers the latest two compliance reporting periods: 2016–2018 and 2019–2021. We assert that the available data indicate that the Espoo Convention has provided relatively modest – in terms of number and extent – opportunities for extraterritorial political representation amongst Parties to the Convention, but its contribution to regional and international environmental governance is considered important, nonetheless. A number of weak or potentially problematic practices are identified, including concerning the requirement for early notification, limited public involvement in decisions on the response to a notification, and limited use of Article 7 on post-project analysis. A particular area of controversy concerns the lack of specifications for a linguistic and translation regime; inconsistent practices herein potentially restrict equivalence in opportunities for involvement between domestic and supranational actors, a fundamental goal of the Espoo Convention. We conclude by outlining three themes for future research covering implementation practices, environmental justice, and the substantive outcomes of the Convention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108186"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552500383X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context is significant in the context of environmental governance because it was one of the first multilateral environmental agreements to formalise extraterritorial actors’ involvement in the environmental planning of sovereign nation states. In this article, we examine patterns and practices of extraterritorial political representation under the Espoo Convention and consider its strengths and limitations in extending representation beyond national borders. The analysis draws upon data contained in publicly available national reports submitted by Parties to the Convention under compliance procedures. The data covers the latest two compliance reporting periods: 2016–2018 and 2019–2021. We assert that the available data indicate that the Espoo Convention has provided relatively modest – in terms of number and extent – opportunities for extraterritorial political representation amongst Parties to the Convention, but its contribution to regional and international environmental governance is considered important, nonetheless. A number of weak or potentially problematic practices are identified, including concerning the requirement for early notification, limited public involvement in decisions on the response to a notification, and limited use of Article 7 on post-project analysis. A particular area of controversy concerns the lack of specifications for a linguistic and translation regime; inconsistent practices herein potentially restrict equivalence in opportunities for involvement between domestic and supranational actors, a fundamental goal of the Espoo Convention. We conclude by outlining three themes for future research covering implementation practices, environmental justice, and the substantive outcomes of the Convention.
环境规划方面的治外法权政治代表性:欧洲经委会欧洲经委会跨界环境影响评估公约规定的模式和做法
联合国欧洲经济委员会《跨界环境影响评估埃斯波公约》在环境治理方面具有重要意义,因为它是首批将域外行为体参与主权民族国家环境规划正式化的多边环境协定之一。在本文中,我们研究了《埃斯波公约》下的治外法权政治代表权的模式和实践,并考虑了其在将代表权扩展到国界之外方面的优势和局限性。该分析利用了《公约》缔约方根据遵守程序提交的可公开获得的国家报告中的数据。这些数据涵盖了最近两个合规报告期:2016-2018年和2019-2021年。我们断言,现有数据表明,《埃斯波公约》在数量和范围上为《公约》缔约方之间的域外政治代表提供了相对有限的机会,但它对区域和国际环境治理的贡献仍然被认为是重要的。确定了一些薄弱或可能有问题的做法,包括要求尽早通知、公众有限参与对通知作出反应的决定以及有限地使用关于项目后分析的第7条。一个特别有争议的领域是缺乏语言和翻译制度的规范;这里不一致的做法可能会限制国内和超国家行为者参与机会均等,而这是《埃斯波公约》的一个基本目标。最后,我们概述了未来研究的三个主题,包括实施实践、环境正义和《公约》的实质性成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信