Preferences for clinical trial participation among people who use drugs in rural Oregon and Appalachian Ohio

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kathryn E. Lancaster , Caroline W. Koudelka , Miriam R. Elman , Madison N. Enderle , Sarann Bielavitz , Angela T. Estadt , Ryan R. Cook , P. Todd Korthuis , April M. Young
{"title":"Preferences for clinical trial participation among people who use drugs in rural Oregon and Appalachian Ohio","authors":"Kathryn E. Lancaster ,&nbsp;Caroline W. Koudelka ,&nbsp;Miriam R. Elman ,&nbsp;Madison N. Enderle ,&nbsp;Sarann Bielavitz ,&nbsp;Angela T. Estadt ,&nbsp;Ryan R. Cook ,&nbsp;P. Todd Korthuis ,&nbsp;April M. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rural communities in the United States face significant challenges in participating in clinical trials, despite being heavily impacted by opioid and injection drug use epidemics. Barriers such as transportation, stigma, and limited resources often deter rural people who use drugs (PWUD) from engaging in research. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can help identify trial design features that support participation by eliciting participant preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We selected DCE attributes and attribute levels through literature review and qualitative interviews. Peer-based Retention of People who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R<sup>2</sup>) study participants in rural Oregon and Appalachian Ohio completed the DCE at their baseline visit. We used conditional logit models to estimate preference weights.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 478 participants completed the DCE and most (71 %; n = 337) were from Oregon. The majority were male (63 %; n = 299) and were white (85 %; n = 404). Overall, transportation support, particularly travel reimbursement (preference weight=0.87; p &lt; 0.01; relative utility versus videochat=1.15), was the most valued feature for clinical trial participation. Participants also preferred shorter appointments (relative utility of 1-hour versus 3-hour=0.44) and evening over morning appointments (relative utility=0.29).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rural PWUD preferences underscore the need to redesign clinical trial protocols with equity and feasibility at the forefront. Direct transportation support emerged as the top priority, reflecting how rural poverty and isolation limit access. Preferences for shorter and later-day appointments suggest a need for low-burden, flexible scheduling. Incorporating participant-centered features can improve trust, enrollment, and retention, ensuring rural PWUD are included in research that addresses their needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 112894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625003473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rural communities in the United States face significant challenges in participating in clinical trials, despite being heavily impacted by opioid and injection drug use epidemics. Barriers such as transportation, stigma, and limited resources often deter rural people who use drugs (PWUD) from engaging in research. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can help identify trial design features that support participation by eliciting participant preferences.

Methods

We selected DCE attributes and attribute levels through literature review and qualitative interviews. Peer-based Retention of People who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R2) study participants in rural Oregon and Appalachian Ohio completed the DCE at their baseline visit. We used conditional logit models to estimate preference weights.

Results

Overall, 478 participants completed the DCE and most (71 %; n = 337) were from Oregon. The majority were male (63 %; n = 299) and were white (85 %; n = 404). Overall, transportation support, particularly travel reimbursement (preference weight=0.87; p < 0.01; relative utility versus videochat=1.15), was the most valued feature for clinical trial participation. Participants also preferred shorter appointments (relative utility of 1-hour versus 3-hour=0.44) and evening over morning appointments (relative utility=0.29).

Conclusions

Rural PWUD preferences underscore the need to redesign clinical trial protocols with equity and feasibility at the forefront. Direct transportation support emerged as the top priority, reflecting how rural poverty and isolation limit access. Preferences for shorter and later-day appointments suggest a need for low-burden, flexible scheduling. Incorporating participant-centered features can improve trust, enrollment, and retention, ensuring rural PWUD are included in research that addresses their needs.
俄勒冈州农村地区和俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区用药人群对临床试验参与的偏好
背景美国农村社区在参与临床试验方面面临重大挑战,尽管受到阿片类药物和注射吸毒流行病的严重影响。交通、污名化和资源有限等障碍往往阻碍农村吸毒者参与研究。离散选择实验(dce)可以通过激发参与者的偏好来帮助确定支持参与的试验设计特征。方法通过文献回顾和定性访谈,选择DCE属性和属性水平。在俄勒冈州和俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区的农村研究中,基于同伴的药物使用者保留率(PROUD-R2)研究参与者在基线访问时完成了DCE。我们使用条件logit模型来估计偏好权重。结果总共有478名参与者完成了DCE,其中大多数(71%,n = 337)来自俄勒冈州。大多数是男性(63%,n = 299)和白人(85%,n = 404)。总体而言,交通支持,特别是旅行报销(偏好权重=0.87;p < 0.01;相对于视频聊天的效用=1.15),是参与临床试验最重要的特征。参与者还喜欢较短的预约(1小时相对于3小时=0.44),晚上预约比早上预约(相对效用=0.29)。结论农村PWUD偏好强调了重新设计临床试验方案的必要性,公平性和可行性放在首位。直接运输支助成为最优先事项,反映出农村的贫穷和闭塞如何限制了获取。对较短时间和较晚时间预约的偏好表明,需要低负担、灵活的日程安排。纳入以参与者为中心的特征可以提高信任度、入学率和保留率,确保农村PWUD被纳入满足其需求的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信