{"title":"Unknown etiology group of late onset epilepsy more likely to show epileptiform EEG abnormalities than cerebrovascular disease group","authors":"Akihiko Nakaya , Kazuhiro Kato , Kazutaka Jin , Satoru Ohtomo , Nobukazu Nakasato , Masashi Aoki","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether the cerebrovascular disease (CVD) group of late-onset epilepsy shows lower detection rates of interictal and ictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) using routine EEG than other etiology groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had first seizure at age 65 years or older. The detection of EAs was investigated as well as background factors including age at EEG, timing of EEG after the last seizure, recording time of EEG, EEG-vigilance, and antiseizure medications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the detection rate of EAs between etiologies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EAs were detected in 53 (27 %) of 196 patients with late-onset epilepsy: 17 (20.7 %) of 82 patients with CVD, 9 (29.0 %) of 31 with traumatic brain injury, 4 (23.5 %) of 17 with other structural etiologies, 1 (20.0 %) of 5 with metabolic etiology, 9 (28.1 %) of 32 with dementia, and 13 (44.8 %) of 29 with unknown etiology. The odds ratios for EA detection, using the CVD group as the reference, were 1.60 for traumatic brain injury, 1.32 for other structural etiologies, 0.98 for metabolic etiology, 1.57 for dementia, and 4.10 for unknown etiology. The unknown etiology group showed significantly higher detection rate than the CVD group (<em>p</em> = 0.010).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The higher detection rate in the unknown etiology group may indicate the presence of latent etiologies with high epileptic activity, while the lower detection rate in the CVD group may reflect electrophysiologically inactive lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 110721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine whether the cerebrovascular disease (CVD) group of late-onset epilepsy shows lower detection rates of interictal and ictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) using routine EEG than other etiology groups.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had first seizure at age 65 years or older. The detection of EAs was investigated as well as background factors including age at EEG, timing of EEG after the last seizure, recording time of EEG, EEG-vigilance, and antiseizure medications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the detection rate of EAs between etiologies.
Results
EAs were detected in 53 (27 %) of 196 patients with late-onset epilepsy: 17 (20.7 %) of 82 patients with CVD, 9 (29.0 %) of 31 with traumatic brain injury, 4 (23.5 %) of 17 with other structural etiologies, 1 (20.0 %) of 5 with metabolic etiology, 9 (28.1 %) of 32 with dementia, and 13 (44.8 %) of 29 with unknown etiology. The odds ratios for EA detection, using the CVD group as the reference, were 1.60 for traumatic brain injury, 1.32 for other structural etiologies, 0.98 for metabolic etiology, 1.57 for dementia, and 4.10 for unknown etiology. The unknown etiology group showed significantly higher detection rate than the CVD group (p = 0.010).
Conclusion
The higher detection rate in the unknown etiology group may indicate the presence of latent etiologies with high epileptic activity, while the lower detection rate in the CVD group may reflect electrophysiologically inactive lesions.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.